I think most of you have had to sit through diversity training, where you were taught by an uneducated, inexperienced, incompetent failure about what morals and beliefs you should have in order to be a good person. Well, sometimes the indoctrination can get ugly. Let’s talk about one case where the instructor harassed and bullied an attendee, who later took his own life.

Here’s the story from the New York Post:

A former Toronto principal has died by su1c1de after facing harassment for calling out an anti-racism instructor who allegedly claimed that Canada was more racist than the US.

Richard Bilkszto, 60, had served as a fill-in principal for the Toronto District School Board until his reputation was “systematically demolished” after he was labeled a supporter of white supremacy for calling out a black instructor during anti-racism training in 2021, according to a lawsuit filed against the district earlier this year.

Naturally the school board sided with the bully against the victim:

Bilkszto claimed that after he reported Ojo-Thompson’s alleged misconduct, the school board failed to look into it, appearing to side with the instructor as one member of the board praised her for handling the principal’s “discomfort.”

The Toronto Sun noted that transcripts of the training sessions show that “Kike Ojo-Thompson offered up Bilkszto as an example of white supremacy”.

An inquiry found the Kike Ojo-Thompson guilty of “workplace harassment and bullying”:

The Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) eventually looked into the matter and found that Ojo-Thompson’s conduct “was abusive, egregious and vexatious, and rises to the level of workplace harassment and bullying.”

Do you know how employers are not supposed to “retaliate” if they are found guilty of some workplace related infraction? Well, this guy’s employer (the school district) did retaliate:

[T]he district refused to reinstate his contract, which Bilkszto claimed was a result of either his fallen reputation or as retribution for having the WSIB investigate the incident.

If there is one thing you can count on from secular left women like Kike Ojo-Thompson, it’s their hatred of accountability.

The KOJO Institute did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for comment.

No accountability. No accountability for her destructive actions. Seriously, why do secular leftist women think that men would ever want to date them, much less marry them? Men don’t get involved with women who show this egregious lack of accountability. That would be a huge mistake for a man to make.

Secular leftists like Kike Ojo-Thompson can’t conceive that the victims of their selfishness could ever greet their harassment and bullying with anything other than worship and gratitude. The rules don’t apply to secular leftists. They think that they are better than everyone, and they should be allowed to force their views on others. Even with bullying and coercion. How could they be wrong?

This article from True North explains how someone with a useless degree and no marketable skills can avoid starvation:

A Critical Race Theory (CRT) organization chaired by the founder of controversial diversity consultancy KOJO Institute has received over a million dollars in government grants – including from Ontario’s Progressive Conservative government.

Parents of Black Children (PoBC), which says CRT is one of its core principles, advocates against the presence of police liaisons in schools and for “decolonized” curricula, the inserting of “Black Canadian experiences” into math and for all academic streaming to be abolished.

In 2022, the organization listed that its Board of Directors was chaired by KOJO Institute founder Kike Ojo-Thompson.

This is why men need to be really careful with women who don’t have STEM degrees or a trade. A without a STEM degree or a trade, to me, is a red flag that shows that she has been coasting through life, dropping math and science courses, avoiding anything challenging, but still being rewarded without ever earning anything by merit. Only choose women who have had to suffer through challenges where their ability had to produce real-world results. That’s how men AND women learn to be accountable. You cannot enter a marriage with someone who has coasted through life, without having to produce results in the real world.

I saw this article in the Wall Street Journal, and thought it was a good idea to post about it, so that if I get into a debate about Big Tech with someone, I can just find it again. I’ll also link to some other social media censorship stories so we have a few of them.

Here’s the article from the Wall Street Journal: (archived)

Facebook removed content related to Covid-19 in response to pressure from the Biden administration, including posts claiming the virus was man-made, according to internal company communications viewed by The Wall Street Journal.

The emails show Facebook executives discussing how they managed users’ posts about the origins of a pandemic that the administration was seeking to control. “Can someone quickly remind me why we were removing—rather than demoting/labeling—claims that Covid is man made,” asked Nick Clegg, the company’s president of global affairs, in a July 2021 email to colleagues.

“We were under pressure from the administration and others to do more,” responded a Facebook vice president in charge of content policy, speaking of the Biden administration. “We shouldn’t have done it.”

[…]The email, and a number of other such internal company communications, were obtained by the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee, which has been investigating what GOP lawmakers say is the Biden administration’s improper efforts to censor Americans’ speech on social media about Covid and other topics.

Over at the far left The Hill, I found this related article:

Facebook had refused to open its own files on government censorship efforts. That came to an end when the House Judiciary Committee finally moved to hold Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg in contempt of Congress.

The resulting Facebook Files confirmed what many of us have suspected for years. Indeed, the emails proved to be a mirror image of what had occurred at Twitter — a massive effort by the government to pressure the company to censor its critics and other dissenting voices.

Not just truth, but even jokes were censored:

There was to be no allowance for humor or even true information that did not advance the government’s narrative. The House has uncovered a myriad of grants given to academic and private groups to blacklist and target those with opposing views, including the posting of true information.

There was an array of government agencies targeting citizens and groups for censorship. In another hearing, I testified on efforts by Jen Easterly, who leads the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, to extend her regulatory authority by declaring that “critical infrastructure” includes “our cognitive infrastructure,” in which she saw it as her role to build “resilience to misinformation and disinformation.”

The administration also demanded the removal of “malinformation” that is “based on fact, but used out of context to mislead, harm, or manipulate.”

Government-funded groups such as the Stanford Virality Project declared that even “true stories…could fuel hesitancy” over taking the vaccine or other measures. The Twitter files showed that this included “worrisome jokes.”

What’s a good remedy for this? Where do the people who were censored go to get justice? Maybe we should have criminal trials for the leaders of these social media companies, who seem to have violated the First Amendment rights of Americans.

One more thing that I found at Trending Politics:

The House Judiciary Committee received a host of subpoenaed materials documenting the correspondence between the White House and Facebook. Among these materials were memos that showed the White House was pressuring the social media to change their algorithms to promote media outlets that the White House approved at the explicit expense of outlets that the White House disapproved of. The ostensible reason for this request was to discourage the spread of misinformation.

One memo dated April 14, 2021, shows White House digital director Rob Flaherty requesting that Facebook “change the algorithm so that people were more likely to see NYT, WSJ, any authoritative news source over Daily Wire, Tomi Lahren, polarizing people. You wouldn’t have a mechanism to check the material impact?”

Anyway, I’ve collected some of my previous posts about Facebook helping the Democrat party and interfering in our elections.

• Twitter and Facebook suspend LibsOfTikTok after she reported on sex-change surgery on kids
• Facebook and Twitter spread disinformation about Hunter Biden’s laptop to help Biden win in 2020
• Facebook / Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s election meddling violated bribery laws
• Peer-reviewed medical journal blasts Facebook “fact checkers” for censorship
• Facebook has a long record of censoring speech critical of Democrats
• Facebook fact-checker caught plagiarizing 54 articles
• Facebook bans Christian professor for disagreeing with Biden’s executive actions
• Facebook “non-partisan” fact-checker revealed to be a far-left Trump-hating Democrat
• Facebook “fact-checker” Politifact forced to retract “false” rating against Candace Owens
• When Facebook fact-checkers conflict with peer-reviewed studies, who is right?
• Potential violation of election law: Facebook and Twitter censor Biden scandal
• Facebook and Google removing content that harms Democrat party
• Facebook censors admit that they suppress Republican content to help Democrat Party
• Facebook censors interview with abortion survivor to help Democrats win 2020 election
• Facebook uses pro-abortion “fact checkers” to label pro-life pages “fake news”
• Facebook bans Christian apologist David Wood for posting the death threats he received
• Facebook censors criticism of Democrat Party, especially before “important elections”