A new report on the UK child sex-trafficking scandal was privately funded because the UK government refused to investigate the child sex-trafficking gangs themselves. Why? Because they didn’t want to appear “racist” to the unskilled immigrant population they’ve been taking in. In this post, we will get a link to the report, some of the details of specific cases, and then I will have some recommendations to Americans on how to avoid such problems.

I’ve been blogging about these stories for years on my blog. I just think that it is so important that we not take away the innocence of little girls just because of this mad desire for skin-color diversity and multiculturalism (diluting the majority of Christian beliefs in Western nations).

Anyway, here is a link to the report.

But since I know you’re all busy, I’m just going to print the text of a tweet from a British pastor named Jamie Bambrick. I found this tweet through the excellent Nancy Pearcey, and you should follow her on Twitter.

Jamie says:

Here are eight essential quotes from @RupertLowe10 ‘s Rape Gang Inquiry.

1) This was a nationwide, not merely local, phenomenon.

“…that this was never a series of isolated local failures. It was a coordinated, nationwide pattern of organised child sexual exploitation that repeated in town after town, city after city, from the far north to the south coast.”

2) The scale was enormous, more than anyone dared to think.

“The scale of the crimes committed is staggering. It has been previously established that, at the very least, 250,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking, torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and lifelong trauma. The true number is probably higher.”

3) As has been reported, the vast majority of perpetrators were Pakistani Muslims.

” In court records and official inquiries, around 87% of those convicted in these group-based child sexual exploitation (‘CSE’) cases bore distinctively Muslim names… Dr. Taj Hargey, an imam with the Oxford Islamic Congregation, believes the true proportion of gang members who are Muslims to be around 95%.”

4) Vulnerable girls were targeted using a consistent method.

“Organised networks of perpetrators built coordinated operations that transported victims between locations, supplied them with drugs and alcohol, recorded abuse for distribution and blackmail, and passed girls between multiple adult men.”

5) The police, and other institutions, knew what was happening and ignored it.

“Police forces ignored repeated reports, criminalised victims instead of perpetrators, destroyed evidence, and allowed known rapists to walk free on bail. Social care services undermined protective parents, placed children in trafficking hubs inside children’s homes, closed cases despite clear indicators of exploitation, and retaliated against whistleblowers. The NHS recorded genital injuries, multiple sexually transmitted infections in children as young as 13, pregnancies caused by rape, and suicide attempts, yet discharged victims back to their abusers without safeguarding referrals or trauma care. Schools observed older men collecting girls at the gates, heard disclosures of rape on school premises, and responded by excluding victims rather than protecting them.”

6) Those in these institutions did so because they were afraid of being called ‘racist’.

“Political correctness, fear of accusations of racism, and fear of losing electoral support from certain demographics have taken precedence over the protection of British children.”

7) Parts of the foster and orphan care system became exploitation hotspots.

“Children’s homes became trafficking hubs where staff failed to stop older men collecting girls at night. Local authorities often returned children to unsafe homes and placements despite repeated disclosures of grooming… Social care across England systematically enabled organised grooming and the rape of children. Children’s services, local authorities, foster carers, children’s homes, and independent units repeatedly returned vulnerable children to known risk.”

8) Multiple offenders explicitly linked their treatment of these girls with their own religious and cultural beliefs, and the girls’ white ethnicity.

“They were taken to houses, flats, restaurants, and hotels where they were raped repeatedly by groups of men, tortured, filmed for blackmail, and told they were “white trash” or “kuffar” who merited punishment.”

There must be comeuppance for this, and it must involve the death penalty.

I found many of the specific details from specific cases on this Twitter feed.

Here are a couple of examples and notice how useless and corrupt the UK police are:

And the victims were even arrested instead of the criminals:

Here is one explanation of why the police looked the other way – “and even police officers”:

And it’s important to remember how the leaders of the UK police repond to anyone who draws any attention to their failures, reported by Fox News:

London’s Metropolitan Police chief warned that officials will not only be cracking down on British citizens for commentary on the riots in the U.K., but on American citizens as well.

“We will throw the full force of the law at people. And whether you’re in this country committing crimes on the streets or committing crimes from further afield online, we will come after you,” Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley told Sky News.

They’re going to arrest Americans for posting about their failures online! We are the real villains who need to be investigated, arrested and imprisoned.

Remember, all these police and social workers are taxpayer-funded. So, they are there to serve taxpayers. But as you can see, the used their jobs as a way of feeling good about themselves for not being “racist”. They saw their true customer as themselves “here is my chance to show the world what a good person I am, because I don’t judge anyone”. If this were the private sector, they would be fired for failing to serve customers. But it’s the unionized public sector, so they don’t care about customers. Customers are just prey.

This is a big reason why it’s important for Americans to oppose unions of all kinds – but especially public sector unions. And definitely monopolies. Your liberty, safety and prosperity depend on the responsiveness and accountability of the people who sell you products and provide you with services. At least in America, conservative states and cities have great law enforcement. Because they are accountable to taxpayers.

And I also thought this was interesting:

Again, why would you expect the wealthy Epstein class of Democrat-donors to report on a scandal like this? They believe in diluting the majority who believe in Christian truths and Christian moral values with unskilled Muslim immigrants. It makes them feel good. And they just ignore the results. We vote very carefully to make sure that we have elected officials and police who are able to rationally ground moral values and duties.

I have to blog about this, because I was around during the time of same-sex marriage becoming legal, and everyone pushing for gay adoption. Everyone put these blue stickers with yellow equal signs on their cars and asked “how would same-sex marriage affect your marriage”. Big corporations dragged employees into sensitivity training. And then the Supreme Court redefined the word marriage to benefit adults instead of children.

So, here we are with this story from Human Events now:

A UK gay couple has been found guilty of charges related to the death of 13-month-old Preston Davey. Former teacher Jamie Varley was found guilty at Preston Crown Court of murder, child cruelty, sexual offences, and possessing indecent images relating to Davey. Varley was in the process of adopting the toddler with his partner, John McGowan-Fazakerley, who was also convicted of allowing the death of a child, child cruelty, and sexual assault, per the Crown Prosecution Service.

Just four months after being placed with the couple, Preston was rushed to Blackpool Victoria Hospital unconscious and in cardiac arrest. He could not be saved. Varley claimed the child had drowned in the bath, but prosecutors proved that his airway had been deliberately obstructed, per the BBC.

[…]The prosecution’s case against Varley was built on evidence, including indecent images found on his phone, taken by the perpetrators of the victim, as well as the post-mortem examination, which ruled out the defendants’ claims of drowning as the cause of death. The post-mortem found 40 external and internal injuries to Davey’s body, some being consistent with “forcible penetration” and sexual abuse.

I thought this was interesting, because of what we know about UK law enforcement turning a blind eye to child sex-trafficking gangs run by men of Middle Eastern origin, because they did not want to be accused of racism by investigating the allegations. Could the the medical workers and social workers and law enforcement have been afraid of being labeled “homophobic”, like the police was afraid of being labeled “racist”?

The UK Telegraph talks about that:

Social workers and medical staff have been accused of missing a string of opportunities to spot the abuse suffered by baby Preston Davey before he was murdered by his adoptive father.

[…]Preston was taken to hospital three times before he was killed, and each time, medical staff noticed bruises on his body. On one occasion, a hospital safeguarding team referred the matter to Lancashire Constabulary, but the matter was closed when a consultant said there was nothing to worry about.

[…]Social workers visited Preston at home several times before his death, but failed to notice that he was being mistreated and harmed. A post mortem examination identified more than 40 external and internal bruises, as well as injuries consistent with sexual assault.

This is the important part:

Debbie Davey, Preston’s maternal grandmother, has questioned whether fears of being accused of homophobia clouded social workers’ judgment.

Remember, the UK is a country that prides itself on being feminized. They have free healthcare and open borders immigration and two-tier policing. Their state religion is “don’t judge”. Well, surprise, surprise. When good people “don’t judge”, then children suffer at the hands of selfish adults. It doesn’t always look like this particular case, but there’s a lot of it going around, with practices like abortion, IVF and surrogacy, too. Everything is for the selfish adults, and no one cares about the children.

But this happens in the US as well, here’s a recent example:

Here is the latest news story from Christian Post:

A same-sex Georgia couple who pleaded guilty to aggravated sodomy against their two adopted sons were recently sentenced to 100 years in prison without the possibility of parole.

Zachary and William Zulock, a wealthy couple who adopted two boys with the help of a now-defunct Christian adoption agency, faced sentences for multiple other charges, including child molestation, sexual exploitation of children and incest, according to a press release from the Alcovy Judicial Circuit District Attorney Randy McGinley.

“These two defendants truly created a house of horrors and put their extremely dark desires above everything and everyone else,” McGinley said.

[…]Judge Jeffrey L. Foster sentenced both men on Dec. 19 to a century in prison, followed by life on probation.

Again, there are a lot of people on the secular and religious left who would say that supporting these anti-child behaviors is not morally wrong. It’s just where we are as a society – people want to feel good and look good to others. No one is willing or able to take the reputational hit for standing up for kids. You could lose your job. You could get arrested by the police. You could be persecuted by LGBT or feminist activists. They want to silence and/or punish anyone who would dare to put children’s needs over adult needs.

These stories remind me of the Two Gay Dads story that I wrote about previously, where a white female progressive journalist did a fawning story about two gay dads and their new boy adopted from Russia. She titled her article, “Two Dads are Better than One”.  She was so proud of herself for being all affirming, tolerant and compassionate. Same-sex marriage is something to be proud of, she said, because children do better with two gay dads.

But then, the Sydney Morning Herald reported how this example of gay adoption went awry.

Excerpt:

Standing before an American court convicted of the most heinous of child sex crimes, the double lives of Australian citizen Mark J. Newt0n and his long-term boyfriend Peter Tru0ng were laid bare.

[…]Moments later Newt0n was sentenced to 40 years in prison for sexually abusing the boy he and Truong, 36 from Queensland, had ‘‘adopted’’ after paying a Russian woman $8000 to be their surrogate in 2005.

Police believe the pair had adopted the boy ‘‘for the sole purpose of exploitation’’. The abuse began just days after his birth and over six years the couple travelled the world, offering him up for sex with at least eight men, recording the abuse and uploading the footage to an international syndicate known as the Boy Lovers Network.

So, back to the story from the UK that just happened. I see new stories about it from far-left sources like the BBC, the UK Guardian, Sky News, etc. I can guarantee you that the journalists writing about this think that they are in the right for supporting practices like abortion, surrogacy, IVF, gay adoption, etc. But when the results come out, they act as if these consequences are somehow completely disconnected from their advocacy. It’s insane.