Story here on the NewsReal blog. (H/T Mary)
Excerpt:
Dr. Jeffrey Siker, professor of religion at Loyola University and a liberal Presbyterian minister, was featured in the LA Times yesterday for an academic paper he did on Obama’s use of the Bible in public speeches and writings. His findings show a candidate and President willing to pick and choose scripture that Obama considers pluralistic and in support of his policies. Siker presents this fact as positive pragmatism instead of what it really may be – sacrilegious ambition.
[…]Obama uses “brother’s keeper” to convince Americans to support socialist policies.
“This vision of being my brother’s keeper has important political and social consequences when it comes to such issues as healthcare, consumer protection or education reform.” – Siker
The problem with that interpretation is that the “brother’s keeper” passage has nothing to do with supporting welfare policies. Cain has just killed his brother Abel, and God was condemning Cain for the sin by asking Cain where his brother was. Cain said he didn’t know where Abel was because he’s not responsible for him. God does not respond by saying, “Yes you are Cain. You are responsible to make enough money to pay not only for your healthcare but also Abel’s.”
Quoting the Bible to teach socialism only works on people who haven’t read the Bible. You can’t get socialism from the Bible, because there is no passage that teaches that Jews and Christians should embrace the idea of wealth redistribution by government. The Bible teaches private, voluntary charity.
Related posts
- Frank Turek interviews Jay Richards on Christianity and capitalism
- Christian professor of economics discusses capitalism, socialism and the Bible
- How I got interested in the relationship between Christianity and economics
- First Things reviews Jay Richards’ Money, Greed and God
- Ron Nash explains what should Christians believe about social justice