On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin and Stephen Meyer finish up their talk with a discussion of why intelligent design presents the best explanation for the Cambrian explosion.
Special limited time offer: Save 43% and get 4 free digital books when you pre-order Darwin’s Doubt.
You can grab the MP3 here.
- What sort of reasoning did Darwin use in The Origin of Species?
- Can this method of “inference to the best explanation” be applied to the Cambrian explosion
- The importance of appealing to causes that we have experienced ourselves
- Example: explaining from an effect (volcanic ash) to a cause that his adequate (volcanic eruption)
- We have experience of how volcanoes cause the ash, so we should infer based on what we know
- In the case where the effect is information in biology, we see that naturalistic mechanisms are inadequate
- But we know from our own experience that intelligent agents can generate information
- Many people think that science must confine itself to materialistic explanations
- If so, then it is possible miss out on the true explanation by ruling it out before looking at evidence
If you haven’t yet read Meyer’s first book, “Signature in the Cell”, you should probably grab that one. It’s the best book on intelligent design that’s out right now. It talks about the origin of the first living cell, surveying all naturalistic explanations for it, and concluding that the best explanation – the one most consistent with what we know now – is intelligent design.