A 400-page book on the culture of corruption in Obama’s regime. Written after just 6 months!
Here she is on Sean Hannity: (H/T Nice Deb)
Here she is on Glenn Beck: (H/T Hot Air)
Guess what?
The Wintery Knight Blog got listed on a prestigious list of apologetics sites compiled by the Internet-King of apologetics, Brian Auten, who runs Apologetics 315. Go pay him a visit and bookmark his site!
By the way, if you are a regular reader, please take a moment to tell your friends about the blog! If you like the blog, chances are that your friends will like it, too! I don’t advertise, so you are my only hope of getting any new readers!
Well, in honor of Brian’s list, I thought that I would write a post explaining what resources I am working through right now!
Books
Right now, I am reading the following books:
And I just received books from two of my favorite ID theorists:
Lectures
I got Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse‘s 3-CD set “Smart Sex” in the mail, and I’ve been listening to that. It’s awesome! You can get it from the Ruth Institute. If you want a sample of her thinking, listen to this 29-minute clip about the effects of same-sex marriage on children.
I also like learning apologetics by listening so today, I ordered an apologetics lecture set from It’s a New Day. This is a perfect set for beginners, as the conference was held in a churches! So, if you go to church, this is for you! Try to make your church buy one! I would recommend burning a backup copy for the church library and saving the originals.
Here are the 32 lectures on CD in the set, grouped by topic:
Historical Jesus
Daniel B. Wallace – Is What We Have Now What They Wrote Then?
Paul Rhodes Eddy – The Criteria of Authenticity
Craig Evans – Fabricating Jesus
Lee Strobel – The Case For the Real Jesus
Ben Witherington, III – Knowing the History of Jesus
Gary Habermas – The Resurrection of Jesus: Knowable History
Postmodernism:
Sean McDowell – Truth or Tragedy
Brett Kunkle – Moral Truth: True for You, but Not for Me?
R. Scott Smith – The Emerging Church: The Promise and the Perils
James Stump – Deconstructing Postmodernism: Truth, Rationality, and the Gospel
Science:
Sean McDowell – The Case for a Creator
Steve Davis – The Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God
James Sinclair – Science and the Cosmos: Prospects for the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments
John A. Bloom – Darwin & Design
Apologetics Advocacy:
Craig Hazen – To Everyone An Answer
Glenn Scorgie – Smash-mouth Apologetics vs. Grace-filled Persuasion
The New Atheism:
Chad Meister – Answering the New Atheism
William Lane Craig – The Dawkins Illusion
Philosophy of Religion:
J.P. Moreland – Argument from Consciousness
Michael Murray – Is Belief in God Hard-Wired in the Brain?
R. Douglas Geivett – Wrestling With the Problem of Suffering
Michael Rea – Why Doesn’t God Show Himself?
David P. Hunt – What Does God Know? The Problems of Open Theism
Charles Taliferro – The Coherence of Theism
Philosophical Theology:
Steve Porter – Did Jesus Have to Die? Defending the Christian Doctrine of Atonement
Paul Copan – The Incarnation of Christ in Philosophical Perspective
Garry DeWeese – Making Sense of the Trinity
Brett Kunkle – Is One Way the Only Way?
Paul Copan – Why I Believe in Hell: A Philosopher’s Reasoning
Cults and World Religions:
Kevin A. Lewis – Cults and Crimes: The Limits of the First Amendment
Josh Lingel – Standing Up To Islam
Questions and Answers:
Sean McDowell & Brett Kunkle – Ask Your Toughest Questions
The set was $159. Pretty soon Obama will be confiscating that money for elective abortions paid for by Obamacare, so I thought I’d better splurge now! If this sounds like a lot of money to spend on apologetics, you should pick up the book “Passionate Conviction”, which is based on an earlier conference. This is my favorite apologetics book to give to beginners! Or cut out cable for 3 months! I don’t even have a TV!
Paul Rhodes Eddy – The Criteria of Authenticity
Michael Murray – Is Belief in God Hard-Wired in the Brain?
R. Scott Smith – The Emerging Church: The Promise and the Perils
Sean McDowell – Truth or Tragedy
James Sinclair – Science and the Cosmos: Prospects for the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments
Ben Witherington, III – Knowing the History of Jesus
Craig Evans – Fabricating Jesus
Chad Meister – Answering the New Atheism
Steve Davis – The Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God
Glenn Scorgie – Smash-mouth Apologetics vs. Grace-filled Persuasion
Brett Kunkle – Moral Truth: True for You, but Not for Me?
Craig Hazen – To Everyone An Answer
William Lane Craig – The Dawkins Illusion
Daniel B. Wallace – Is What We Have Now What They Wrote Then?
Sean McDowell – The Case for a Creator
Steve Porter – Did Jesus Have to Die? Defending the Christian Doctrine of Atonement
R. Douglas Geivett – Wrestling With the Problem of Suffering
Charles Taliferro – The Coherence of Theism
Paul Copan – The Incarnation of Christ in Philosophical Perspective
Garry DeWeese – Making Sense of the Trinity
Michael Rea – Why Doesn’t God Show Himself?
David P. Hunt – What Does God Know? The Problems of Open Theism
James Stump – Deconstructing Postmodernism: Truth, Rationality, and the Gospel
Brett Kunkle – Is One Way the
Gary Habermas – The Resurrection of Jesus: Knowable History
Sean McDowell & Brett Kunkle – Ask Your Toughest Questions
Kevin A. Lewis – Cults and Crimes: The Limits of the First Amendment
Paul Copan – Why I Believe in Hell: A Philosopher’s Reasoning
John A. Bloom – Darwin & Design
Josh Lingel – Standing Up To Islam
UPDATE: Welcome visitors from Blue Like You! Thanks for the link Joanne!
Canadian/American free speech activist Mark Steyn on the line with Chicago radio show host Milt Rosenberg. Commercial free!
Extension 720 – Mark Steyn – June 1, 2009
URL : http://www.wgnradio.com/media/mp3file/2009-06/47337079.mp3
Duration : 1 hours 29 mins 26 secs
He re-caps the history and outcome of his trial in Canada for offending Muslims, and goes on to discuss his previous book “America Alone: The End of the World As We Know It” and his new book “Lights Out: Islam, Free Speech And The Twilight Of The West“. He reviews the state of free speech, Western Civilization, single-payer health care, welfare, anti-Western attitudes in education, and the 2008 election results.
BONUS
Ezra Levant reports on his debate against secular-leftist professor Lucie Lamarche on CBC radio. Note that the start time is 1:12 into the show. Press pause, let the clip buffer for a few minutes, then drag the slider to the 1:12 position.
Last Sunday I was on Michael Enright’s CBC radio show, The Sunday Edition, debating human rights commissions along with Keith Martin, the Liberal MP, and a nutty professor called Lucie Lamarche.
You can listen to the show here — it’s the May 31 edition. The debate starts at about 1 hour and 12 minutes into the show.
[Lamarche] loses her grip at 1:25 when Enright challenged her on the lack of due process and natural justice in HRCs. Her first response is to dismiss the horrors of HRCs as my own personal story. When I pushed back, citing the very section of the Alberta act that allows warrantless search and seizures, and pointing out that targets of HRCs don’t get legal aid, she just collapsed, saying that “discrimination is about attitudes… and transformation. It’s not only about due process.”
Oh. So to hell with the law or fairness. Guys like me need to have our attitudes transformed. It’s not law. It’s brutal politics pretending to be the law.
I like this Lucie Lamarche — for her honesty.
After a few minutes of her reading her talking points — likely authored by the battallion of PR flacks at the Canadian Human Rights Commission — she just stops pretending that HRCs are about justice. They’re about politics and propaganda — making political dissidents like me conform to the “official line”. And the high costs? That’s just an additional punishment for our thought crimes.
Seriously: when she ran out of her prepared talking points, she said what she truly believed: this was about transforming attitudes.
Ezra also hints at which kind of people fight back to defend human rights, and what kind of people destroy human rights:
Readers, do you think that Orwell or Solzhenitsyn would call Lamarche a defender of human rights, or a destroyer of them?
Do you think that giving the state the power to transform your attitudes is a protection of your freedoms, or an abridgement of them?
Do you think that Lucie Lamarche follows in the footsteps of dissidents who challenged the conventional wisdom, like Martin Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi — or is she a descendant of the censors and bullies who tried to shut those two up?
Do not miss this debate podcast! Ezra is on fire!
And remember: we know that the secular-left believes in pounding down the good and lifting up the evil, so that moral judgments become impossible and no one feels badly for being morally evil. Remember Evan Sayet’s explanation for how progressives think: moral equivalence, postmodernism and moral relativism. And atheists do not have the ability to resist Islamo-fascism: they want to be happy, not to be heroes.