I like to have some diversity in my Twitter feed, so I follow some people who disagree with me. One of those people is Andy Ngo, who is gay. I started to follow Andy because he does a good job reporting on the secular leftist fascist movement in America (Antifa), fake hate crimes and false accusations. The tweet above is from Andy, and after I read the story he linked, I decided to write about it.
Here’s the story from The Post Millennial.
Word spread quickly on social media this evening that Simon Fraser University has backed out of its decision to host the event entitled “#GIDYVR: How Media Bias Shapes the Gender Identity Debate” on November 2nd.
In addition to Vancouver feminist Meghan Murphy, the event was slated to feature Quillette Canadian editor Jonathan Kay and The Post Millennial contributor Anna Slatz, and was co-organized by Mark Collard, an SFU professor of anthropology, Amy Eileen Hamm, Holly Stamer, and GIDYVR. Free speech activist Lindsay Shepherd was set to moderate.
Collard, who had originally sponsored the event and assisted in booking the venue at SFU’s Harbour Centre campus, decided to withdraw his support for the event after speaking to senior director of campus public safety, Tim Marron. Marron explained that there was a high risk of violence as a result of the event.
[…]The Post Millennial also reached out to Meghan Murphy, who told us, “We are still going to fight this. GIDYVR is in touch with our lawyer, Jay Cameron, from the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms in order to put pressure on SFU to keep our booking. Apparently, there was a meeting involving a trans activist group, and security determined that there was a viable threat of violence from this group.
The article notes that Marron thought that after meeting with the trans activist group, that on a scale of 1 to 10, the probability of violence was an 11.
It looks like it would be a pretty interesting event. I’ve blogged about Meghan Murphy before. She’s a feminist, so I don’t agree with her on many things. And I blogged about Lindsay Shepherd, and I don’t agree with her on many things. But I wouldn’t stop them from speaking in public. I don’t see why in a free country that people can’t get together on campus to debate and disagree about something controversial. Unless it’s not a free country at all?
One thing is clear. If I were presenting my views to other people, and their response was that my disagreement with them would cause them to kill themselves, then I would really wonder about whether their views were able to be defended rationally and evidentially. And if they said that their response to disagreeing views was to resort to vandalism, fake hate crimes, lawsuits, death threats, violence and even attempted murder (e.g. – the domestic terrorism attack by the gun-wielding gay activist Floyd Lee Corkins II against the Family Research Council headquarters), then I would just lump that person in with the other fascists in history, like Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc. All on the secular left, notice.
Here is a good rule that applies to everyone: If you can’t make your case for your views using reason and evidence, but must instead use threats of violence to cancel out free speech that offends you, then you’re a fascist, no different than any other fascist, except that maybe you lack the means at this time to achieve the results they did in a society that still is running on the fumes of Judeo-Christian moral standards. As a conservative, I am fine with free speech that disagrees with me. I don’t use threats, coercion and violence against those who disagree with me. Think what you want. Say what you want. It ought to be like that in a free country.
11 thoughts on “How do LGBT activists respond to free speech discussions of LGBT issues?”
I don’t mind people being gay in itself, but I don’t support the militant liberal LGBT intolerance for any criticism…
The LGBTQ-XYZ crowd keeps claiming that they are victims of violence and hatred, but they are the ones threatening and actually committing violence. Why can’t they see that THEY are the hate-mongers?
For the same reasons why Antifa doesn’t realize that they’re the actual Fascists.
They are called the Gaystopo for good reason.
I think one day they or the left in general will go too far impugning on others, and then things will get ugly.
I want to see a debate between feminists and LGBT activists.
I am rather enjoying the scene between the trans-women and feminists. Since women vote overwhelmingly left, that clucking sound you hear are the chickens coming home to roost.
LikeLiked by 2 people
A must-see: https://nosafespaces.com/
It is insane that Christians and Conservatives have become the defenders of free speech rights for those they don’t agree with.
But it has come to that with the militant antifa.
We also need police to step in and start to enforce the law against illegal groups like this. Call in a large police presence to make a statement for free speech and if that group breaks the law and acts out under their proclaimed threats they should be prosecuted.
The lack of enforcement of the law against militant left groups and the ignoring of what they do by the media is the cause of the social issues.
These Antifa and LGBT activists remind me of another group from the 1930s.
I think they were called Hitler’s Brownshirts.
That’s the point I was trying to make, too. It’s the activists, not all of them.