Israeli education minister dismisses chief scientist for asking questions

Scary story from Haaretz.

Excerpt:

The Education Ministry’s chief scientist sparked a furor among environmental activists and scholars Saturday with remarks questioning the reliability of evolution and global warming theory. The comments from Dr. Gavriel Avital, the latest in a series of written and oral statements casting doubts on the fundamental tenets of modern science, led several environmentalists to call for his dismissal.

“If textbooks state explicitly that human beings’ origins are to be found with monkeys, I would want students to pursue and grapple with other opinions. There are many people who don’t believe the evolutionary account is correct,” Avital said yesterday.

[…]Avital, who received bachelor’s and advanced degrees from Haifa’s Technion Institute of Technology, previously directed the aeromechanical arm of electronic-systems manufacturer Elbit.

Avital is the ministry’s first chief scientist to be drawn from outside the community of education scholars. A 20-year Likud member, he represented the party in an unsuccessful 2006 Knesset run.

[…]”Why are environmental organizations pressuring the government over alternative energy that is both unattainable and probably very costly? These questions cannot be avoided,” Avital wrote. “The answers to them are likely to surprise and possibly disappoint. But the moment science is enlisted for political ends – that is, in the name of ideology – questions arise as to the scientific basis of environmental organizations.”[…]In an article published last year in the newspaper Israel Hayom and other media outlets, Avital wrote, “There is no scientific proof that the rise in carbon dioxide leads to a rise in temperatures – I would recommend to scientists not to join this intimidation campaign, which is entirely predicated on the basis of dubious science.”

Now, let’s take a look at the “arguments” of the people who are trying to silence him.

Prof. Hava Yablonka of Tel Aviv University said Avital’s statements are tantamount “to saying that space should be given in textbooks to the view that the earth is flat and the sun revolves around it. It’s astonishing that the chief scientist of a government ministry can say such bizarre things.”

“Avital must resign from his position,” said Dr. Lia Ettinger, academic supervisor of the Heschel Center for Environmental Learning and Leadership in Tel Aviv. The chief scientist’s remarks, she said, “are similar to the Health Ministry’s chief scientist declaring that all the research linking cigarettes with cancer are nonsense. …Avital has removed himself from the consensus,” she said.

Notice how they take their questionable theory and say that it is similar to a completely unrelated theory for which we have observational confirmation. And then they say he stupid for not equating the two things, which is the very point under debate – is there evidence for the weaker theories like there is for the stronger theories, which he obviously accepts? Notice that none of the people who are trying to silence him brought up arguments. They just commit the fallacy of begging the question, and then they demand that he agree with them. It really just amounts to insulting him rather than refuting him. Is that science?

William Dembski and Michael Shermer debate live online Thursday

Here at Challenge Washburn’s web site.

Details:

Evolution or Design: Does science provide evidence for a Designer?

Thursday, October 7 @ 8-10 PM EASTERN TIME

Washburn University Memorial Union (Washburn Room A/B)

Dr. Michael Shermer vs. Dr. William Dembski

Come join us and bring a friend as these two scholars debate one of the the foundational questions of reality and faith! …or

Watch LIVE right here at challengewashburn.com

Their time is 7-9 PM, but I think they are on Central Time, so I put 8-10 PM Eastern Time.

It looks like you can WATCH THE DEBATE ONLINE at their web site.

Do you have to raise taxes in order to balance the budget?

A video from a libertarian explaining why you don’t HAVE to raise taxes to get rid of the budget deficit. (H/T Ponder With Us)

The only part I don’t like is the shot at President Bush, who ran a deficit ONE TENTH the size of Obama when he was in charge in 2006. There is a difference to all but the crazy people who don’t understand that 150 billion in 2006 is not equal to 1500 billion in 2009. 2006 is the last year the Republicans held the House and Senate. In 2007, the spending and bailouts started, and the deficit started to balloon out to where it is now.