Limericks are illegal in the UK, if they make people feels sad

Britain descends into fascism with two-tier policing, criminalizing speech

I’m not sure if you heard about this, but Britain had an election recently, and they decided to elect secular leftists. What is the secular left championing? Open borders immigration policies, two-tier policing, and suppression of speech critical of the regime’s policies or ideology. Let’s take a look at what it’s like to be a taxpayer in the UK and live under secular left fascism.

Consider this article by Tim Dieppe, which appeared in The Critic.

There is a perception that the police can treat Muslim protestors differently to white protestors. Scenes of police running away from an Asian-led protest in Leeds contrasted with riot police responding in Southport. Indeed, protestors in London mocked the police there, chanting, “Where the f*** were you in Leeds?”

I disagree with any armed protests, and would never attend one. Violence is never justified, except as a last resort in self-defense when all other options have been exhausted. (Although in the UK, self-defense against violent criminals is effectively illegal – it is illegal to brandish a kitchen knife at trespassers from inside your own home)

But there’s more evidence of two-tier policing in the past, as the article explains:

Two years ago I wrote about how Christian evangelist Hatun Tash was arrested by police in Speakers’ Corner after having her Qur’an stolen from her. You can watch footage of the incident here. Hatun had broken no laws and done nothing wrong. In fact, she was the victim. No one was arrested for stealing her Qur’an. The crowd of Muslims mocked her as she was brutally frog-marched off into a police van amidst chants of “Allahu Akbar”.

Only after being strip-searched, having her glasses removed from her so that she could not read, being questioned at 4:00am, arrested again, and detained for a total of 15 hours was she finally released without charge.

Hatun’s stolen Qur’an was later found by the police. She deliberately uses a large copy of the Qur’an with holes drilled through it to remind Muslims that a famous Islamic apologist admitted that “the standard narrative [of the origins of the Qur’an] has holes in it.” This is undoubtedly provocative, but it is nowhere near being a crime. Astonishingly, video footage shows the police later finding her copy of the Qur’an and handing it to Muslim onlookers! One Muslim shortly afterwards brazenly put out video footage of himself holding the stolen Qur’an! Isn’t there an offence of handling stolen goods? Did the police take any action? Did they heck.

This was not the first time that Hatun has been wrongfully arrested. Metropolitan Police paid out £10,000 for wrongful arrests in 2020 and 2021. They also issued a statement of apology. Sadly, they don’t seem to have learned their lesson.

Police policy appears to be to effectively to enforce elements of sharia law. If you offend Muslims you will be arrested. Hatun has proven this several times. There are no arrests, however, for offending Christians. Not that there should be any arrests for causing offence at all. Being offensive is, after all, not an offence. If it were, we would not have free speech at all. Not that the police seem to understand this or be at all interested in protecting free speech, particularly when it comes to Islam.

What really grates, is that there are also no arrests for assaulting or stealing from Christians — even when done in broad daylight with multiple witnesses and video footage. Even when repeated requests are made for action to be taken. What other conclusion are we supposed to draw than that two-tier policing is a reality?

The police are warning people not to talk about two-tier policing on social media, and threatening action against anyone who does. Why would they try to suppress this? Well, the police in the UK want potential tourists in the West to think of the UK as a peaceful country, where tourists are safe from criminals. “Our open border immigration policies are working fine”, they say, “nothing for you to worry about here”.

But there’s a lot for you to worry about:

Since 7 October we have seen police stand by while protestors call for Jihad or chant antisemitic slogans. The police response to Islam-related protests or riots is clearly muted in comparison to the reaction to white protests. Video-footage of an unarmed 72-year-old white woman with a pacemaker being arrested by five riot police in London went viral on the internet.

Videos of pro-Palestine groups of masked and sometimes armed men congregating and threatening or attacking people with no police presence to be seen, contrast with riot police out in force for unarmed white groups.

Here’s what we mean by two-tier policing:

Video footage emerged on Saturday showing a police liaison officer in Stoke-on-Trent telling Muslim protestors that they could leave their weapons at the mosque. He said:

We will work with you guys for the best solution. The EDL lot I’ve been assured have left.

If there are any weapons or anything like that, then what I would do is discard them at the mosque.

Don’t give anybody any reason to have any interaction with the police, so if there’s any weapons, get rid of them, we are not going to arrest anybody. You don’t want us to make arrests or start dispersing people. Is that alright?

Police have now admitted that public confidence was undermined by this incident and are said to be reviewing the incident. It is a criminal offence to carry a knife or a weapon. Allowing Muslims to leave their weapons at the mosque rather than arresting them for this crime is another example of two-tier policing.

This is similar to how the British police declined to investigate complaints from mothers about their daughters being sex-trafficked by Muslim men. They didn’t want to “inflame racial tensions”. And if you criticize them for what they’ve done, then they want to punish you for it. But if you post a meme that criticizes the secular left, then the police are all over you. This is fascism.

The article notes:

Even more concerningly, Met Police Commissioner, Sir Mark Row1ey, appears to want to criminalise people who claim that there is two-tier policing. In an interview with Sky News he suggested that people who say that there is two-tier policing are legitimising violence. He added: “If you’re a keyboard warrior, you’re not safe from the law if you incite violence.”

Would you live in a country like that? Would you even visit it? I would expect the police in the UK to join in the murdering of me, rather than protect me from actual criminals. They are serious about collecting their salaries paid for by taxpayers, but not serious about doing their job of protecting those taxpayers. At what point can we just describe law enforcement in the UK as Gestapo or Stasi? They exist to protect the secular left regime from criticism. That’s it.

And just to be clear, half my family is Muslim, I have very dark skin, and I am a legal immigrant (by employer sponsor, in the highest category of merit) to the United States. No problem with any of that. But I think I’ll decline from ever setting foot in the UK, and so should you. It’s not any different than any other corrupt country running the communist fascist playbook. I wouldn’t visit a garbage country like Venezuela, just as I wouldn’t visit the UK.

4 thoughts on “Britain descends into fascism with two-tier policing, criminalizing speech”

Leave a comment