From the Wall Street Journal. (H/T Mary)
Excerpt:
On Friday, the federal government almost shut down over abortion, more than 38 years after Roe v. Wade was supposed to have settled the question. Politico reports on the Thursday-night negotiations over funding the government for the remainder of fiscal 2011:
The low point may have come Thursday night.
House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) had spent more than an hour meeting with President Barack Obama in the Oval Office, inching toward a deal to avert a shutdown, but he kept insisting that it include a prohibition against federal funding for Planned Parenthood.
That was a nonstarter for Obama. As the meeting was breaking up, Vice President Joe Biden told the speaker, in no uncertain terms, that his demand was unacceptable. If that became the deal breaker, Biden said, he would “take it to the American people,” who would presumably punish the GOP for shutting down the government over an ideological issue.
“They were faced with a choice–they would either have to give in or shut down the government,” said a senior administration official, describing how the negotiations went from there.
A Bloomberg account has Obama telling Boehner during the same meeting: “Nope, zero. John, this is it.” And that was it. The Republicans did well in the negotiation overall: “Boehner agreed to a package of $38.5 billion in cuts, a significant victory for a man who said his goal was to extract as much as possible from the federal budget,” Bloomberg reports. But they yielded on the question of subsidizing Planned Parenthood, America’s biggest abortion provider. (How big? Timothy Carney of the Washington Examiner reports that “it performed 332,278 abortions in 2009, while serving 7,021 prenatal clients and referring 977 parents to adoption services.”)
[…]There’s also a financial angle. Planned Parenthood receives millions in taxpayer subsidies and spends hundreds of thousands on lobbying and campaigning. In February, OpenSecrets.org reported that Planned Parenthood’s political action committee “donated more than $148,000 to federal candidates–almost all Democrats–during the 2010 election cycle” and “spent more than $443,000 overall.” Planned Parenthood made an additional $905,796 in “independent expenditures” during the 2010 cycle–exercising its right to free speech pursuant to last year’s Citizens United decision.
The biggest beneficiaries of Planned Parenthood money, according to OpenSecrets.org, were Sens. Patty Murray of Washington and Barbara Boxer of California. According to the Hill, both were also among “a defiant group of Senate women,” all Democrats, who “said Friday they’ll oppose any spending bill that would affect reproductive health funding”…
The Republicans tried, but the Democrats would not budge on funding abortion with taxpayer dollars.
The fight was not over abortion at all, but tax funded abortions. Libs try to change the tune, but don’t fall for it. Recently 7 out of 7 stings Planned Parenthood offered to use tax payer money to do abortions on 13 year old non English speaking prostitutes. Later another 5 stings they offered an tax funded abortion to a 14 year old girl pregnant from her 31 year old boyfriend which is statutory rape. Not once did they turn in this rapist and he would have been free to rape again. I do not want my tax money going to any organization like this. If they do good things, then the organization needs to be cleaned up and the illegal things must not be supported by tax dollars. How can anybody defend these illegal and immoral actions.
LikeLike
I hear what you’re saying, but why didn’t the GOP defund Planned Parenthood when they had majority control from 2001-2006?
LikeLike
Good point, but they didn’t have the House, Senate and Presidency for all of that time. But yes, I agree with you.
LikeLike
The defunding of Planned Parenthood is not about stopping abortion, but about stopping Federal funding of it, Planned Parenthood has been caught numerous times lately doing this.
LikeLike
It seems that Republicans are following the Democrats lead in what I consider neo-politics. Rather than depending on Congress to pass landmark bills, of which there is little optimism, they simply defund pet projetcs and/or regulate them to death (like what Obama is doing with energy).
LikeLike