Woman recants rape charge after man spends 2 years in jail

Political Map of Canada

Story from Calgary, Alberta, the most conservative province in Canada.

Excerpt:

Charges against a Calgary man accused of raping a woman over a 10-hour period nearly two years ago have been unexpectedly stayed.

Crown prosecutor Karuna Ramakrishnan issued the stay after the 44-year-old complainant, who recanted her story under cross-examination by defence lawyer Rebecca Snukal on Wednesday, failed to show up in court on Friday for further questioning.

She had been ordered to do so by Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Sandy Park, so Ramakrishnan could reconsider her position.

John Francis Dionne, 43, had faced charges of sexual assault causing bodily harm, kidnapping, assault causing bodily harm and uttering death threats in connection with the alleged incident on Oct. 28, 2008.

His first trial ended in a mistrial in June, because of an issue with one of the jurors, and was rescheduled for this week.

The woman initially outlined in detail what she says occurred during the ordeal, but when cross-examined, she couldn’t remember specific details.

Then, when asked why she would accept a ride from the man she claimed had raped her for 10 hours she became frustrated and denied it even happened.

“I’m lying about everything,” she told Snukal.

“Hurry along because I’m lying about everything. He’s not a rapist . . . so there, that’s it. End of it . . . he didn’t rape me.

“Let Mr. John Francis go free. He’s not a rapist. It’s over. That’s all I have to say. Let him out.”

Dionne, who had been in custody since his arrest, was to be released some time later on Friday.

Her name has not been released – but his name was released. His life is therefore ruined. And she will probably not be charged, since it is very rare that women are charged for making false accusations. The man spent 2 years of his life in jail. Was there any evidence? She says she was lying about EVERYTHING. How could there be any evidence? And yet he spent two years in jail.

What effect will this have on men? What should men believe about women when things like this happen? What does this tell us about the court system?

Why do women make false accusations of rape?

One recent study listed three reasons why women invent false rape accusations.

Excerpt:

A study of rape allegations in Indiana over a nine-year period revealed that over 40% were shown to be false — not merely unproven. According to the author, “These false allegations appear to serve three major functions for the complainants: providing an alibi, seeking revenge, and obtaining sympathy and attention. False rape allegations are not the consequence of a gender-linked aberration, as frequently claimed, but reflect impulsive and desperate efforts to cope with personal and social stress situations.” ( Kanin EJ. Arch Sex Behav. 1994 Feb;23(1):81-92 False rape allegations. )

In 1985, a study of 556 rape allegations found that 27% accusers recanted when faced with a polygraph (which can be ordered in the military), and independent evaluation showed a false accusation rate of 60%. (McDowell, Charles P., Ph.D. “False Allegations.” Forensic Science Digest, (publication of the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations), Vol. 11, No. 4 (December 1985), p. 64.)

And this also happens in divorce trials in order to get custody.

False accusations in divorce trials

Consider this article from Touchstone magazine, by Stephen Baskerville.

Excerpt:

Today it is not clear that we have learned anything from these miscarriages of justice. If anything, the hysteria has been institutionalized in the divorce courts, where false allegations have become routine.

What is ironic about these witch-hunts is the fact that it is easily demonstrable that the child abuse epidemic—which is very real—is almost entirely the creation of feminism and the welfare bureaucracies themselves. It is well established by scholars that an intact family is the safest place for women and children and that very little abuse takes place in married families. Child abuse overwhelmingly occurs in single-parent homes, homes from which the father has been removed. Domestic violence, too, is far more likely during or after the breakup of a marriage than among married couples.

Yet patently false accusations of both child abuse and domestic violence are rampant in divorce courts, almost always for purposes of breaking up families, securing child custody, and eliminating fathers. “With child abuse and spouse abuse you don’t have to prove anything,” the leader of a legal seminar tells divorcing mothers, according to the Chicago Tribune. “You just have to accuse.”

Among scholars and legal practitioners it is common knowledge that patently trumped-up accusations are routinely used, and virtually never punished, in divorce and custody proceedings. Elaine Epstein, president of the Massachusetts Women’s Bar Association, writes that “allegations of abuse are now used for tactical advantage” in custody cases. The Illinois Bar Journal describes how abuse accusations readily “become part of the gamesmanship of divorce.” The UMKC Law Review reports on a survey of judges and attorneys revealing that disregard for due process and allegations of domestic violence are used as a “litigation strategy.” In the Yale Law Review, Jeannie Suk calls domestic violence accusations a system of “state-imposed de facto divorce” and documents how courts use unsupported accusations to justify evicting Americans from their homes and children.

The multi-billion dollar abuse industry has become “an area of law mired in intellectual dishonesty and injustice” writes David Heleniak in the Rutgers Law Review. Domestic violence has become “a backwater of tautological pseudo-theory,” write Donald Dutton and Kenneth Corvo in the scholarly journal Aggression and Violent Behavior. “No other area of established social welfare, criminal justice, public health, or behavioral intervention has such weak evidence in support of mandated practice.”

If we care about justice for all, then we have to care about this, too.

Related posts

9 thoughts on “Woman recants rape charge after man spends 2 years in jail”

  1. Wow, this is terrible… They need to apply the principle of “innocent until proven guilty”. And deliberate false accusations should be prosecuted.

    Like

    1. Absolutely agree. Obviously either the “victim” had a better lawyer or the jury allowed their emotions rule rather than facts. In have been a jury member on a two similar cases and it was amazing to see how personal backgrounds and biases can cloud peoples judgement (but I suppose you get that when it is a jury of your peers rather than a panel of judges).

      Secondly, this type of case belittles the actual cases of rape and abuse.

      Like

      1. Moo: “Secondly, this type of case belittles the actual cases of rape and abuse.”

        Thanks, Moo, for saying this.

        It was very reasonable and helps to keep me out of these things when I don’t have time to really go after it.

        Like

          1. Okay, this is fine Wintery.

            And I’ll let it go except to explain to you how you come across to me, at times.

            I know and agree that there are groups of women out there who hate men, family, and pregnancy and that they are pushing things that are not good for our country.

            But when you continually point out what women are doing wrong without balancing out what men are doing wrong, in a similar fashion, it makes me feel* like you are getting your info and marching orders from masculinist groups who are a bunch of disgruntled men/fathers (some are even former abusers who were stopped by the system when the system works) who are out to push women back to a time when women had no rights and no way of getting any justice against an abuser. These masculinist groups want the deck stacked unfairly against women out of anger, fear, and bitterness.

            When you put up so many of these stories, I have to fight hard the urge to bring some balance with stories of my own pointing out that men can be just as evil and hurtful toward women, whether in the courts or elsewhere.

            (* Sorry to use the words ‘feel’ and ‘seem’. I know we are supposed to be logical and factual. But motivation still comes in play. And since I cannot KNOW your motivation, but only see your actions that seem to imply a certain motivation, I must use the words feel and seem in order to fully express my concerns while at the same time leaving room for the possibility that you are not associated with the angry masculinist groups I’ve dealt with in the past. Groups that are just as guilty of manipulating the numbers and statistics as any feminist group you might meet.)

            Like

  2. Thanks for your comment, Mara. I agree. I think that Wintery’s intention is to “balance out” the hardline feminist bias in the liberal media. He has said as much elsewhere when I’ve brought this up. So his intention is good. Unfortunately, it doesn’t come across that way. The impression given (and this is significant, because it speaks to effective communication) is of a one-sided bias against women. Readers don’t see it as balancing out the liberal media. Readers see the content of this blog as an accurate self-contained depiction of Wintery’s views. It’s important that we point this out for Wintery’s benefit, so that we help him to communicate more effectively and not give a skewed impression of his actual views.

    Like

    1. Thanks Mary.
      And I guess, just as Wintery is reacting against secular culture, I’m reacting against the over-kill back-lash going on among Christians that is destroying families, churches, and individuals. This Christian back-lash against the toxic ‘evil woman’ belief is making as many, if not more, atheists and feminist as the misinformataion on abortion.

      Women are getting it from both sides.
      And neither side is playing fair, considering all the facts, or considering the crushed hearts and spirits they are producing with their ‘remedies’.

      Like

Leave a comment