Today’s interview is with Jim Wallace of PleaseConvinceMe.com and host of the PleaseConvinceMe Podcast. As a cold case detective, Jim brings a unique perspective to his approach to apologetics and a very down-to-earth logical style. In this interview, Jim talks about his approach to the evidence (inference to the best explanation), Tactics and apologetics, debate vs. dialogue, pitfalls to apologists, and more.
Topics:
Jim’s background as an Catholic-raised atheist, and cold-case detective
Jim believed in the progress of science to answer all the unresolved questions
How did Jim become an atheist?
Why didn’t Jim respond to Christians witnessing to him without evidence?
What approach worked to start him thinking about becoming a Christian?
What did Jim do to grow as a Christian?
How did Jim’s police training help him to investigate Christianity?
What investigative approach is used in his police work?
Does “abductive reasoning” also work for investigating Christianity?
What sort of activities did Jim get involved in in his community?
How Jim’s experience as a youth pastor convinced him of the value of apologetics
How young people learn best by training for engagement with opponents
How Jim takes his youth on mission trips to UC Berkeley to engage the students
Is it possible to run an apologetics ministry part-time while keeping a day job?
Do you have to be an expert in order to have an apologetics ministry?
What books would Jim recommend to beginning apologists?
How the popular apologist can have an even bigger impact than the scholar
How the tactical approach is different for debates and conversations
Jim’s advice for Christians who are interested in learning apologetics
How Christian apologist need to make sure they remain humble and open-minded
How your audience determines how much you need to know from study
Jim’s reason for becoming an atheist, (his mother was excluded from the Catholic church after her divorce), is one I have heard before. I like the way he eventually came back to Christianity. No big emotional crisis, just taking a sober second look at the evidence by himself, and talking with his Christian friends. I’m impressed with the way he has such a productive ministry, as well.
Today’s interview is with Jim Wallace of PleaseConvinceMe.com and host of the PleaseConvinceMe Podcast. As a cold case detective, Jim brings a unique perspective to his approach to apologetics and a very down-to-earth logical style. In this interview, Jim talks about his approach to the evidence (inference to the best explanation), Tactics and apologetics, debate vs. dialogue, pitfalls to apologists, and more.
Topics:
Jim’s background as an Catholic-raised atheist, and cold-case detective
Jim believed in the progress of science to answer all the unresolved questions
How did Jim become an atheist?
Why didn’t Jim respond to Christians witnessing to him without evidence?
What approach worked to start him thinking about becoming a Christian?
What did Jim do to grow as a Christian?
How did Jim’s police training help him to investigate Christianity?
What investigative approach is used in his police work?
Does “abductive reasoning” also work for investigating Christianity?
What sort of activities did Jim get involved in in his community?
How Jim’s experience as a youth pastor convinced him of the value of apologetics
How young people learn best by training for engagement with opponents
How Jim takes his youth on mission trips to UC Berkeley to engage the students
Is it possible to run an apologetics ministry part-time while keeping a day job?
Do you have to be an expert in order to have an apologetics ministry?
What books would Jim recommend to beginning apologists?
How the popular apologist can have an even bigger impact than the scholar
How the tactical approach is different for debates and conversations
Jim’s advice for Christians who are interested in learning apologetics
How Christian apologist need to make sure they remain humble and open-minded
How your audience determines how much you need to know from study
Jim’s reason for becoming an atheist, (his mother was excluded from the Catholic church after her divorce), is one I have heard before. Without saying anything about the Catholic church’s policy. I like the way he eventually came back to Christianity. No big emotional crisis, just taking a sober second look at the evidence by himself, and talking with his Christian friends. I’m impressed with the way he has such a productive ministry, as well.
Please Convince Me is my absolute favorite podcast. The host, J. Warner Wallace, is a cold case homicide detective. He has a real job! And he talks about Christian things like you might expect a detective to talk – everything is logic, case-making and evidence. Very cool.
secularism makes it harder for us to defend our faith and values in public and influence the culture
why is secularism happening? it’s because young people are walking away from the faith
young Christians are leaving the faith in high school and college
this is where the real battleground is – and that’s where apologists need to focus
we need to be focused especially on junior high school and high school, and to a lesser degree college
it’s good that we have lots scholars working physics, philosophy and biology
but what we really need is ordinary Christians to get serious about apologetics and work on young people
some people believe that there is no great youth exodus problem: are they right to doubt the statistics
it’s undeniable that young people are inarticulate about their faith – that much is certain
what young people in church actually believ is not Christianity, but moralistic therapeutic deism
young people: life is about feeling good, being liked, and nice people of all religions are saved
young people think that there is so little substance to Christianity that it can’t even be discussed
the focus among young people today is not on true beliefs, but on being kinds to others
even in churches, there is higher respect for helping others than on having knowledge and evidence
instead of focusing on the worldview that grounds good works, the focus is on good works
young people have learned to minimize discussions about specifics of theology
teachers and college professors are hostile to public expressions of evangelical Christianity
television is also hostile and much less Christian than it used to be
even if young people come back to the church, they come back for the wrong reasons
the adults come back for tradition and comfort but they don’t really believe Christianity is true
they want to pick and choose what they believe based on what they like, like going to a buffet
they return to church when they have kids so that their kids will absorb values – but not truth
that’s what we have sitting in the pews: people who think Christianity is false, but “useful”
and that’s why so many christians are so liberal on social values (abortion, same-sex marriage)
they don’t really accept the Bible as authoritative, they pick and choose what they like and don’t like
if Christianity is taught as “useful” then they will dump it when they find something more “useful”
people who leave the church are exposed to Christianity, but it doesn’t stick
young people lose their faith before college, and then when they escape the nest, they act it out
the disconnecting from the faith occurs in high school, but it only becomes public after they leave home
young people are becoming more focused on redefining “the good life” with consumption and materialism
the typical experience of young adults involves alcohol use, drug use, and recreational sex
young people actually want more than niceness – they want real answers to serious questions
young people have doubts and questions, but no one in the church or home is equipped to answer them
adults have to be involved in the education of young people
parents who are engaged in teaching their children Christian truths see much better retention rates
we need to stop teaching people (one-way preaching) and start training them (two-way interactive)
when you give a young person a definite goal – a fight with a date certain – then they will be engaged
when people know that they will fail unless they can perform, then they will be more engaged in learning
church needs to be in the business of scheduling battles, and then training young people for the battles
there is no sense of urgency, risk and purpose in young people, so the teaching is not effective
I’m absolutely sure you will love these podcasts. Give them a listen! I’m pretty sure that he will put me in jail if you don’t listen to them. So, um… please do!