Category Archives: News

Fascist Washington Post doxxes woman who exposes groomers in the schools

One of the accounts I follow on far-left Twitter is a lady who finds and shares public TikTok videos made by school employees who talk to very young children about sex and sexual topics. You would think that the secular leftists in Big Tech and the Corporate News Media would be opposed to sexualizing children. But you’d be wrong. They actually go after the people who expose the groomers.

First, let’s review what LibsOfTikTok is about.

Daily Wire:

The wildly popular Twitter account known as “Libs of TikTok” simply holds a mirror up to the radical Left, but apparently that’s just too embarrassing for one media figure who doxxed the woman behind it.

The move, by Taylor Lorenz, a reporter at The Washington Post and formerly of The New York Times, prompted a massive backlash from prominent figures on Twitter. Critics say revealing the identity of the woman, who scours TikTok for extreme hot takes from the far-left and posts them without comment, serves no newsworthy purpose.

[…]The Libs of TikTok account, which has about 663,000 followers, also shared an update. The founder, who The Daily Wire is not naming, said she was safe and thanked everyone for their concern and well wishes as her identity, job details, and other personal details were published Tuesday morning.

[…]Libs of TikTok has attracted more than a half-million followers and tens of millions of views on Twitter, Instagram and YouTube since launching the account in 2020. She has given several interviews, but always anonymously.

There’s a good summary of some of the things that LibsOfTikTok tweeted here.

Far-left Twitter suspended her account twice, for posting PUBLIC videos posted by the teachers themselves on TikTok. There was no newsworthy purpose for doxxing this woman – the Washington Post did it because they want to protect groomers from parental oversight. They don’t want the things that groomers say to children being exposed to the parents of those children.

The Washington post reporter literally showed up at the houses of her family, on their doorsteps, demanding more information, and intimidating her family. And the Washington Post is backing her up 100% on her harassment and intimidation.

Given the spotty record of LGBT activists (remember Floyd Lee Corkins, who stormed the Family Research Council building with a gun, and was convicted of domestic terrorism?), it’s arguable that this doxxing of an individual was a willful attempt by the Washington Post to expose her to harm – to incite violence from the secular left against her. So it’s no surprise that she is now in hiding.

Here's a bunch of violent fascist thugs

Obviously, the Washington Post journalist had help posting this private information. Software developers may find this post interesting. I find it ironic that these secular leftist hackers try to describe themselves as “anti fascist”. Their behavior is exactly and entirely fascism. These are not people who meet free speech with free speech. They are not capable of rational persuasion. They try to use threats, intimidation, and violence to suppress and destroy those they disagree with. If a secular leftist mentions being anti-fascist, you can be assured that they are willing to use force to compel you to speak and act as they do.

Please pray for the LibsOfTikTok lady. I don’t want her to suffer violence at the hands of the secular left fascists. But if that happens, I hope the Washington Post people responsible for the story, and their hacker ally, will be charged and sentenced for inciting violence against her. They should go to prison for the rest of their lives.

Is the acceleration of the universe’s expansion compatible with Hinduism?

First, a news story – and then we’ll see how the accelerating universe relates to the existence of God.

Excerpt:

Three astrophysicists who discovered that the universe’s expansion is accelerating rather than decelerating, as had been expected, win the Nobel Prize in physics.

Adam Riess was sure he’d spotted a blatant error in his results. It was 1997, and the young post-doc’s measurements of distant, exploding stars implied that the universe was expanding at a faster and faster rate, instead of slowing down, as he had expected.

It wasn’t an error at all. Instead, what was at fault were some basic assumptions about the workings of the universe.

On Tuesday, the Johns Hopkins University astrophysicist received the Nobel Prize in physics for the revolutionary discovery and its implications, along with team leader Brian Schmidt of Australian National University and astrophysicist Saul Perlmutter of UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, who had reached the same conclusion independently.

At the time of their work, astrophysicists believed that the rate of expansion of the universe — set in motion by the Big Bang 13.7 billion years ago — would be slowing down as matter was pulled together by gravity. The goal at the time was to figure out how rapid the deceleration was.

What the two teams found instead was that the expansion of the universe was accelerating — an observation that could best be explained by the existence of a mysterious “dark energy” that pushes matter farther and farther apart.

Many scientists had thought that, just as the universe started with the Big Bang, it would end with a Big Crunch — with gravity pulling all the matter in the universe inward.

Does anyone remember that week that I wrote those posts about “Why I am not a… <insert some religion here>”? I explained why I was not all kinds of different religions and denominations, including Roman Catholicism, Calvinism, Hinduism, Judaism, Islam, etc. Everyone was offended and we fought about it. Ah, I remember it well.

Now let’s apply science to the Hindu religion and see if they go together, especially this new discovery about the expansion of the universe.

Why I am not a Hindu

  1. Hindu cosmology teaches that the universe cycles between creation and destruction, through infinite time.
  2. The closest cosmological model conforming to Hindu Scriptures is the eternally “oscillating” model of the universe.
  3. The “oscillating” model requires that the universe exist eternally into the past.
  4. But the evidence today shows the the universe, and time itself, had a beginning at the big bang.
  5. The “oscillating” model requires that the expansion of the universe reverse into a collapse, (= crunch).
  6. In 1998, the discovery of the year was that the universe would expand forever. There will be no crunch.
  7. Therefore, the oscillating model is disconfirmed by observations.
  8. The oscillating model also faces theoretical problems with the “bounce” mechanism.

So that’s one reason why I am not a Hindu. And now we have more scientific confirmation that there is no cycle of universes coming into being and going out of being.

The absolute origin of the universe out of nothing is also incompatible with Buddhism and Mormonism and maybe other religions. They also require an eternally existing universe.

And modern cosmology disagrees with atheism, too

I think it’s important for all of you to be familiar with the scientific evidence for the Big Bang. It will help you with your cosmological argument, and it will help you to refute many, many other religions that require eternal universes, including atheism.

I wrote about how the Big Bang cosmology falsifies atheism before.

Excerpt:

According to the Secular Humanist Manifesto, atheism is committed to an eternally existing universe, (See the first item: “Religious humanists regard the universe as self-existing and not created.”). If something non-material brought all existing matter into being, that would be a supernatural cause, and atheists deny that anything supernatural exists. The standard Big Bang theory requires that all the matter in the universe come into being out of nothing. The Big Bang has been confirmed by experimental evidence such as redshift measurements, light element abundances and the cosmic microwave background radiation. This falsifies eternal models of the universe, which are required by atheist Scriptures.

The experimental evidence that confirms the Big Bang creation out of nothing falsifies many worldviews. Those who care about evidence will have to choose some other religion that is compatible with what we know from science today.

Knight and Rose Show – Episode 1: The Minimal Facts Case for the Resurrection of Jesus

Well, after many years of waiting, our podcast is finally done. It’s not up in every place we want right now, but the applications are in, and you can definitely get it (see below). In this post, you’ll find: speaker biographies, episode summary, show notes, links to the RSS feed, links to podcast directories that have the show already, and links to places where we will be uploading a video version.

Podcast description:

Christian apologists Wintery Knight and Desert Rose discuss apologetics, policy, culture, relationships, and more. Each episode equips you with evidence you can use to boldly engage anyone, anywhere. We train our listeners to become Christian secret agents. Action and adventure guaranteed. 30-45 minutes per episode. New episode every week.

Episode 1:

Episode 1 Summary:

Did Jesus really rise from the dead? In this week’s special Easter episode, Wintery Knight and Desert Rose equip you to have daring and exciting conversations about the resurrection of Jesus with your non-Christian family, friends, co-workers… even strangers. We will show you: 1) how historians evaluate ancient documents, 2) which New Testament reports pass historical tests, and 3) how to construct an argument for the resurrection that will challenge skeptics.

Speaker biographies

Wintery Knight is a black legal immigrant. He is a senior software engineer by day, and an amateur Christian apologist by night. He has been blogging at winteryknight.com since January of 2009, covering news, policy and Christian worldview issues.

Desert Rose did her undergraduate degree in public policy, and then worked for a conservative Washington lobbyist organization. She also has a graduate degree from a prestigious evangelical seminary. She is active in Christian apologetics as a speaker, author, and teacher.

Citations

The testimony of Paul in 1 Corinthians 15:1-11 is the earliest text in the New Testament to make concrete mention of the death, resurrection and appearances of the risen Christ. Here Paul uses traditions which he knows from an earlier period. As 1 Corinthians is usually dated around 50, we may note, first, that the traditions which he mentions must be even older… This early text will be the guideline for our investigations.

A fairly certain date can similarly be worked out for the conversion of Paul as well. The Acts of the Apostles credibly reports a stay of Paul in Corinth when Gallio was there as governor of Achaia (Acts 18). Now this Gallio was in office in 51/52. If we calculate back from this date the intervals which Paul mentions in Gal 1:18… and [Gal] 2:1… and add two years for travelling, the date of his conversion comes out at around 33.

So we may state that the appearances mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 took place in the time between 30 and 33 CE… because the appearance to Paul is the last in this list and is not to be dated later than 33 CE.

From: What Really Happened to Jesus: A Historical Approach to the Resurrection by Gerd Ludemann (see it in Google Books)

Paul wrote to the Corinthians from Ephesus in the early 50s C.E. But he says in 1 Corinthians 15:3 that ‘I handed on to you as of first importance which I in turn received.’ The most likely source and time for his reception of that tradition would have been Jerusalem in the early 30s when, according to Galatians 1:18, he ‘went up to Jerusalem to visit Cephas [Peter] and stayed with him fifteen days.’

From: Excavating Jesus: Beneath the Stones, Behind the Texts by John Dominic Crossan and Jonathan L. Reed

References

Jesus’ Resurrection: Fact or Figment?: A Debate Between William Lane Craig and Gerd Ludemann by Paul Copan (editor) and Ronald K. Tacelli (editor)

What Really Happened to Jesus: A Historical Approach to the Resurrection by Gerd Ludemann

Will the Real Jesus Please Stand Up? A Debate between William Lane Craig and John Dominic Crossan by Paul Copan (editor)

Excavating Jesus: Beneath the Stones, Behind the Texts by John Dominic Crossan and Jonathan L. Reed

Risen Indeed: A Historical Investigation into the Resurrection of Jesus by Gary R. Habermas

William Lane Craig vs. James Crossley | “Was Jesus Raised from the Dead?” | University of Sheffield

Podcast RSS feed:

https://feed.podbean.com/knightandrose/feed.xml

You can use this to subscribe to the podcast from your phone or tablet. I use the open-source AntennaPod app on my Android phone.

Podcast channel pages:

Video channel pages:

Music attribution:

Strength Of The Titans by Kevin MacLeod
Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/5744-strength-of-the-titans
License: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license