Canada LGBT Police Hate Crime Rainbow Fascism

LGBT fascism: father imprisoned for calling his biological child “daughter”

I have a lot to say about this story, so I’ll be brief in re-capping the facts.

The back story from Post Millennial:

H00g1and discovered that the school had been showing his daughter SOGI 123, the going sexual and gend3r identity education materials in British Columbia which amounts to tr4nsgend3r ideology “propaganda videos.” In the grade 7 yearbook, the child was referred to by a different name. The school counsellor changed the child’s name without telling her parents. The school “socially tr4nsitioned” the biologically female child on its own initiative, with the input of a gend3r ideologue psychologist, Dr. Wa11ace W0ng.

When H00g1and accompanied his child to a consultation with W0ng, the psychologist advised the pubescent child to take testosterone. W0ng referred the child to the endocrinology unit at the local hospital. Meanwhile, H00g1and was looking for mental health solutions to help the child without drugs.

On the child’s first visits to the hospital, a treatment plan was put into action. Both the child, and her mother—H00gland’s ex-wife—signed a consent form which explicitly stated that the “treatment” was experimental, meaning that the endocrinologists recommending the treatment didn’t know the long-term health impact.

A gend3r identity activist lawyer, B4rb4r4 Find1ey, represented the child in court. Justice B0den decided that the child’s best interests lay in destroying her long-term health to make her body appear more like that of a male.

H00gland, in contrast, thinks his daughter’s best interests lie in preserving his child’s health, in case his child ends up among the estimated 85 percent of children who desist in their belief that they are the opposite sex once puberty ends.

You can read more about W0ng here.

And here is the latest:

[A] warrant was issued by a judge for the arrest of a father after calling his biological female child his “daughter,” and referring to her with the pronouns “she” and “her.” H00g1and was found to be in contempt of court.

H00g1and is a father to a gend3r non-conforming biological female 14-year-old who identifies as tr4nsgend3r and prefers the use of male pronouns. H00g1and has repeatedly called this person his daughter, though the court has forbade it.

On Tuesday… .He was the arrested and jailed. The warrant was issued by Judge T4mmen on March 4, 2021.

H00g1and opposes his child’s undergoing “gend3r affirmative” medical procedures, and has stated this opposition again and again, in the hope of saving his child from irreversible harm. The Canadian medical system, the legal system, and the child’s mother press ahead with social and medical tr4nsition of the child.

On December 14, 2020, H00g1and was compelled by Justice M4rz4ri’s court to collude in the gend3r “tr4nsitioning” of his fourteen year old daughter and told not to call his biological female child his daughter. In response, H00g1and made a Charter challenge engaging his right to freedom of speech.

Unfortunately, there is no freedom of speech nor freedom of religion in Canada. They simply do not exist, because regardless of what is on paper, the taxpayer-funded judges and politicians who run Canada are secular left fascists – the same kind who have been at the head of Marxist governments in other times and places that resulted in so much suppression of liberty and human rights. When it comes to human rights, Canada has more in common with North Korea than it does with the United States of America.

Now my points.

First, about the man’s wife. Women are generally inclined to generate their system of values by feelings and peer approval. Now that feminism has brainwashed the majority of women to distrust concepts that are more typically linked to men, like objective truth and objective morality, it’s rare to find any women who formed their values by complying with the reality of God’s existence and the objective moral law. They are instead reckless and hedonistic in their behavior, preferring to act first and then deny responsibility later. The whole movement for moral relativism and the subsequent non-judgmentalism is an attempt by feminist women to normalize bad behaviors by demanding “tolerance” and “compassion”. My advice to men at this time is to NEVER marry. I don’t think that most women today are good partners for protecting children from predators. There just isn’t enough going on in society (churches, culture, anywhere) that is countering the pulling of women towards postmodern skepticism and moral relativism.

Second, even if you marry a good woman, one like my senior female advisors who I respect and love, you will have to live in a world run by feminist teachers, counselors, administrators, lawyers, judges, police officers, etc. Having a family exposes you to influence from woke pastors, woke parishioners, woke bureaucrats, woke corporations, woke co-workers, big government workers, etc. Your wife will want social connections, and society will become aware of your belief in God and adherence to the Bible. They will not let you lead your home. You’re already losing money from taxes to pay for fascists who oppose liberty and human rights. Don’t compound the problem by having a family that increases interactions with them. You might remember that I recently blogged about a Canadian man who was forced to pay $50,000 a month to a woman that he never married, had children with or even lived with. And another Canadian man who was taken to court for grounding his daughter, and a female judge ruled against him. Why diminish your Christian influence and effectiveness by having your resources confiscated by secular left fascists?

Third, it’s important to understand the evil consequences of feminist women’s push for tolerance and compassion, i.e. – moral relativism and non-judgmentalism. I have blogged previously about the case of the two g4y dads, who adopted a child only to abuse him and to make child pornography videos. An Australian journalist who wrote a story lauding the two g4y dads and their parenting ability (before they were sentenced for their crimes) complained that she didn’t know they were going to do that. But there are ALWAYS consequences, especially for children, from the feminist female push for moral relativism and non-judgmentalism. Just because those women cannot predict them, in their rush to virtue signal their tolerance and compassion, doesn’t mean they are not responsible. If Robert H00gland’s child regrets her tr4nsition or (God forbid) goes into a depression and commits suicide, then the people responsible will be the ones who seem so tolerant and compassionate today. By the way, there is a story from just this week about how a child court judge who championed “drag queen story hour” has been arrested for child pornography. Canada also had an education minister who championed the sexual exploitation of children in their education curriculum who was also arrested for child pornography. Why not just assume that EVERY secular leftist who talks about tolerance and compassion in public is privately involved in abusing children OR approves of it? How many times must children suffer before we see things as they really are?

Fourth and finally, it’s important to understand that secular leftists who are involved in promoting evil tend to respond to disagreement with fascism. Canada currently has a publication ban on any stories about government overriding the rights of parents. They use ARMED POLICE and IMPRISONMENT to restrict speech that criticizes many of the priorities of the secular left, e.g. – abortion, infanticide, tr4nsgenderism, g4y rights, etc. They are not afraid to use coercive methods. I have blogged about people on the secular left using doxing, termination of employment, boycotts, vandalism, violence, and even DOMESTIC TERRORISM (in the case of the g4y activist who attacked the Family Research Council building with a GUN). These methods are either performed by OR approved by secular leftists. Don’t expect them to respect your liberties and human rights, because there are no God-given liberties or human rights in a naturalistic / materialist universe. And in a naturalist / materialist universe, anything goes for a secular left fascist trying to feel good and get peer approval.

Also, in case anyone from Canada is reading this, I mean you no harm. Unlike you, I have no desire to stop people I disagree with from acting freely, according to their consciences. I want you to be able to work and earn money to survive and provide for your family. As a Christian, my job is to love you and answer your questions about Christianity so that you freely choose to bring your behaviors inline with what you determine to be true. I want you to be free to act like a secular leftist fascist, since you haven’t CONVINCED YOURSELF to act any other way. We’re not going to dox you, silence you, coerce you, or anything that would upset you. But I will use my speech to respectfully but firmly disagree with you. The history of Christianity is REPLETE with the worst kinds of sinners changing their ways and becoming heroes of the faith – loved and respected by all Christians. Look at the apostle Paul – he was a billion times worse than you! Christians hope and pray that you might become curious about the rational arguments and evidence for Christianity and change your own minds at your own pace. It happens all the time. We want the truth-centered best for you, not the self-centered best.

15 thoughts on “LGBT fascism: father imprisoned for calling his biological child “daughter””

  1. Never in my wildest nightmares would I have ever guessed, after Obergefell, that we would see adults conspiring to transgender children. Polygamy, yes, pedophilia normalization, maybe.

    But “changing the sex” of a child?!? Never. Forcing a parent to affirm it?!?

    That is Luke 17:2 territory right there.

    And it is happening here too.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. We’re next. The allure of virtue signaling by tolerance and compassion is irresistible to people who have become untethered from objective morality. If they can’t be good by BEING GOOD OBJECTIVELY then they’ll be good by “tolerating” evil, so everyone who wants to be selfish likes them. Except kids, of course. Abortion, divorce, daycare, public schools and forced transgenderism for them.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I’m so glad we home schooled our kids! I’m not very sure we can even trust the neighborhood “Christian school” unless it’s run by a solid church.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. This is scary. I try to recommend to my Christian friends to homeschool if they can. Sex education has changed a lot since when we were in public school. Thankfully there’s lots of detransitioners who are sharing their stories on Youtube, Reddit, etc nowadays.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I hope she sues everyone involved, including her mother. A 13-14 year old can’t comprehend the irreversible changes being done to her body.

    Beyond that, this is a frightening abuse of power.


    1. I wouldn’t be upset if conservatives passed a law allowing children who were groomed into transitioning to sue every single person involved in the brainwashing. Then they will find out how tolerance and compassionate they are, listening to the harm they did in a courtroom, and being forced to pay for it. Being “nice” feels so good in the moment. But child abuse is crime, and child abusers need to learn not to do that.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. A very solid analysis. I do have one objection, though. You say “My advice to men at this time is to NEVER marry.”

    The only men likely to be influenced by this advice would be men of good, Christian character, which means that fewer of our people would reproduce. People of good character have an obligation to reproduce, if possible. Otherwise our people will eventually become extinct.

    Instead of saying “Never marry,” say “Do whatever it takes to find women of good character, and then marry.” And the best place to look is in Bible-believing churches (which still exist).

    There are no guarantees, but we cannot sit by and allow our people to go extinct.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I had two of my friends, on male and one female, object to that as well. I think I was just really angry because I know some of these female teachers and I know what their justification for bending over for evil is. They want to feel good, they want to be liked. I just find it very upsetting. And I don’t see that anything is happening to change this. No one is calling their emotional commitment to tolerance and compassion into question, based on the harm it causes to children.


      1. So you didn’t exactly mean it literally. Fair enough. A man has the right to blow his top from time to time.

        Men certainly have to know what they’re up against when they marry, and a reading a good concentrated dose of reality helps.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. Yes, I was furious. I’m leaving it there to let women know that they can just vote for tolerance and compassion, then expect a husband to marry them and have kids. Men are not stupid. We know about these stories, and we don’t want our liberty and leadership trampled by childless career women who are taking out their anger at the bad boys who dumped them on good men.


    2. Great reminder that we are to be fruitful and multiply! It has been conjectured that one reason the early Church exploded in size was because they did not murder their babies before or after birth, contrary to the pagan societies that they were often surrounded by, which did BOTH out of “compassion.” (Sound familiar?)

      I’ve been looking a bit at my ancestry, and one of my great-grandparents was the 8th child out of 9. Had she not been conceived, then I would never have been conceived either, at least not in this particular body.

      Anyway, I agree: Christian men should find a woman who is at least willing to commit to a very large homeschooled family. Both parents will have to sacrifice greatly to achieve that in this day and age.


      1. Yes, but even if you did that, you’re going to have to deal with the feminists who are in power. That’s what this post was about – look at what happened to the Dad.


        1. I can assure you that the right woman hates feminism as much, or more, than you do, partly because it creates groups like MGTOW and a general consensus that “all women are Jezebels” and makes it more difficult for HER to find the right man and serve the Lord too.

          Still, I might make her sign a “No Feminism Allowed in This Marriage” prenup. See if she will wear a “Feminists are Jezebels” t-shirt? :-)


  6. Actually there is nothing in the Biblical texts commanding marriage and children for all or even most Christians, unless verses are taken out of context, and nothing in the New Testament. The Lord Himself fulfilled the law to the letter, and He never married or had kids. He had to do that to be the perfect sacrifice to save us.

    To say all or most should be married and/or have kids is adding additional rules the Word does not, much like the Pharisees of Jesus time did. How is it determined who is allowed not to, and who must? Who determines it? How does this person know God’s plan for another person? Did the Lord impart that knowledge upon him? How would he know?

    All one has to do is look at the sorry state of the evangelical church today to see the results of such policies.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s