VP candidate Kamala Harris was able to get picked for cushy high-paying jobs by having an affair with a married man. She used the resources of the state to persecute pro-lifers simply because she disagreed with their pro-life views. And she thinks that Joe Biden sexually assaulted women, but that’s no big deal.
Let’s start with having affairs for career advancement. The Washington Free Beacon reports:
Former San Francisco mayor Willie Brown broke his silence on his relationship with Democratic senator Kamala Harris on Saturday, admitting in his weekly column that he used his powerful post to boost her young career when they dated.
Brown… was openly in an extramarital relationship with Harris when he was speaker of the California State Assembly and running for mayor…
[…]Brown goes on to address the fact that he appointed Harris, who was just a few years out of law school and working at the Alameda County district attorney’s office, to two well-paid posts on California state commissions and later helped her in her first election.
This isn’t a problem for Democrats, because they don’t believe in chastity, fidelity, or marriage. Whenever I see people voting for someone like Kamala Harris, I try to imagine what their personal life must be like. Democrat voters aren’t Christians. They don’t believe the Bible. They don’t believe in chastity. They think infanticide is no big deal. And they have an extremely high rate of out-of-wedlock births, together with an extremely low marriage rate. So, these are not people who are successful at marriage and family. These are not people who do fidelity, honor and lifelong married love well.
Second, what about using the power of the state to attack people who you disagree with? Kamala Harris is an expert in fascism and the persecution of moral reformers.
Life News reported this in April 2019:
David Daleiden and the Center for Medical Progress filed a lawsuit Wednesday against some of California’s most powerful politicians for prosecuting him for exposing Planned Parenthood’s aborted baby body parts harvesting practices.
The lawsuit accuses U.S. Sen. Kamala Harris, state Attorney General Xavier Becerra, Planned Parenthood and others of conspiracy to violate First and Fourteenth Amendment civil rights.
“The California Attorney General first admitted that they are enforcing the video recording law solely based on how they feel about the message being published, and then further admitted they are not even trying to follow the text of the law as written,” Daleiden said.
The lawsuit says Harris, the former attorney general, and Becerra used state video-recording laws as a “political weapon” to silence speech that they disagree with.
[…]Becerra and Harris both are pro-abortion Democrats who have received campaign donations from Planned Parenthood.
Documents reveal that Harris, while running for U.S. Senate in 2016, had a secret, in-person meeting with Planned Parenthood leaders to discuss the investigation; two weeks later, the California Department of Justice raided Daleiden’s home.
According to the lawsuit, Daleiden “seeks justice for a brazen, unprecedented, and ongoing conspiracy to selectively use California’s video recording laws as a political weapon to silence disfavored speech.”
Again, this isn’t going to be a problem for Democrat voters who think that murdering children who dare to get in the way of their recklss pursuit of sexual pleasure is perfectly fine. And that’s every single Democrat politician, and every single Democrat voter. Their god is sex. They sacrifice their innocent children to their god.
Third, Kamala Harris thinks that the multiple accusations of rape and sexual assault against Biden are credible, but these things are not really important parts of a man’s character.
The Hill reports:
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) said Tuesday that she believes women who say they felt uncomfortable after receiving unwanted touching from former Vice President Joe Biden.
“I believe them and I respect them being able to tell their story and having the courage to do it,” Harris said at a presidential campaign event in Nevada.
But now she’s Biden’s VP. Because women being sexually assaulted or even raped by their bosses in the workplace is no big deal for Kamala Harris. In fact, that’s how women get ahead, right?
This woman has no moral character. She’s an exemplary Democrat, and Democrat voters will support her as Vice President, and eventually as President.
8 thoughts on “Three things you should know about the moral character of Kamala Harris”
And while it’s a little off topic, it’s Biden who said white kids would be living in a jungle in integrated schools. He even recently said a black person voting for Trump isn’t really black. He wanted to assault a Michigan auto worker who questioned him on guns, and told him he didn’t work for him.
I can just imagine the uproar if a conservative said such things, but like you said, Democrats have no morals. I’d go as far as saying they are not-so-closet fascists.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m tired of Biden and his cohorts trying to divide America
Reblogged this on FOR GOD AND COUNTRY.
1. So long as it was consensual between both parties, I’d be more upset at the person appointing her to these “cushy jobs”. It’s like Trump having an affair and appointing his mistress to high status jobs. But of course, no Republican has EVER done that.
2. Attacking opposing agendas and people behind these agendas just sounds like something both parties would do. When conservatives are in positions of power (and how you have stated before), they should’ve gone after hard on liberal ideals.
3. WOW. A conservative talking about sexual assault in the workplace while lauding an incumbent who outwardly admitted to sexually assaulting (grabbing her by the pu**y) someone? But that’s no big deal right? Just locker talk.
Try again with tactics that the Republicans aren’t equally, and more hypocritically, guilty of.
Hey, this might be a good article for you, written by Wayne Grudem:
As a conservative Christian who has no problem with sobriety, chastity and fidelity at a personal level, I’m not electing a President to have moral character or to be my pastor.
I’m strictly interested in policies that make my Christian life plan easier. When I compare the live options available, the choice is clear.
My core issue is religious liberty – I need to be able to earn a living without violating my conscience, which allows me to fund the Christian causes that my team is contributing to, e.g. – campus ministry, apologetics conferences, homeschooling world-changing kids, etc.
Joe Biden is very strongly opposed to it:
Kamala Harris is very strongly opposed to it:
I’ve had 4 years of Trump, and it hasn’t hurt me in any way, other than the national debt and potential inflation. And I’ve made more than enough off of the stock market to control for that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the comments John – I always appreciate being able to hear different opinions on the politics of our day.
I wholeheartedly agree there is dirt on both sides of the house. The problem is that as soon as you peel back one layer, there is another layer under it. It’s like a never-ending onion of hypocrisy on both sides. People were (understandably) upset by what Trump stated in the interview about “grabbing the….”, but the Trump side could just as easily state “Why are you making such a big deal about this….look at all the accusations and trash in Clinton’s background and you all still supported him”. It’s a neverending race to the bottom of morals. Given the breadth of well-spoken and decent people on both sides of the aisle, I am still shocked at the poor moral quality of the candidates that have risen to the top. Pence is just about the only one without significant baggage in his history.
Additionally, you stated ” I’d be more upset at the person appointing her to these “cushy jobs”. It’s like Trump having an affair and appointing his mistress to high status jobs. But of course, no Republican has EVER done that.” Candidate Harris was not some young, impressionable inexperienced adult when this happened. She was a bar-qualified attorney. She HAD to have known how bad this looked, and how even the casual observer would see the “quid pro quo” aspect of this. If she did not, we can only assume that either it was common enough in that state / party / era to be business as usual, she was too arrogant to care, or frankly too ignorant to see. No matter what the scenario, it reflects very poorly not only on Willie Brown (who provided it), but also to Harris who as a sitting attorney absolutely should have known better.
One last point I will make is that, as noted above, there is plenty of dirt on both sides of the aisle. Both parties have secrets and rotten people within them. HOWEVER, it is shocking to me how somehow Candidate Harris is getting a pass on this in the mainstream media. To me, this situation is huge, as it speaks to her character when she thinks no one is watching. Granted, Trump is guilty of the same things, but while he is continually shredded in the media, we hear barely a peep about this.
Here’s a thought to ponder – if this situation had come up with Pence, do you believe for a second he would get a pass and wink on it from the media? He would be mercilessly hammered on it (as any candidate should). You and I both know he would, not only now but 4 years ago as well. The fact that she (as a liberal and Democrat) is not held to the same standard by the majority of the media is astounding to me, and should be deeply concerning to us as a nation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This woman has no moral character.
Neither, alas, do most of America’s voters. We can only hope and pray that they are at least smart enough (a tall order, I know) to recognize the toxicity of her platform.