Do pastors have a responsibility to know apologetics?

The latest episode of the Reasonable Faith podcast was all about a post done by Pastor Matt Rawlings. The post talked about how churches train children to become atheists.

Pastor Matt offered 6 points in his post:

  • Reason #1 – Churches seem overprotective.
  • Reason #2 – Teens’ and twentysomethings’ experience of Christianity is shallow.
  • Reason #3 – Churches come across as antagonistic to science.
  • Reason #4 – Young Christians’ church experiences related to sexuality are often simplistic, judgmental.
  • Reason #5 – They wrestle with the exclusive nature of Christianity.
  • Reason #6 – The church feels unfriendly to those who doubt.

In his post Pastor Matt said this:

Too many churches do in fact present a shallow faith that skips doctrine and apologetics for “how to…” sermons that are little more than self-help talks with scripture sprinkled over them.  The refusal to learn theology and how to defend the faith as well as to spend the time thinking about how to present them in a clear and winsome manner is at the heart of all four of the valid objections by young people to the evangelical church.  Pastors must simply take this responsibility seriously and put in the time and effort.  There is no other answer.

[…]Det. J. Warner Wallace has argued that we have to T.R.A.I.N. Christian students rather than teach them but I think we need to train all of our fellow Christians (and he would agree).  Training is harder than teaching.  We need to remember that it takes at least seven times for the average person today to hear something before they retain it.  Also, most people do not truly understand something until they put it into practice.  Thus, pastors must be trained in order train congregations to truly be lay theologians and apologists.  The pastors must then challenge the congregation to use their skills reach out to the lost and help each other.  And all of those trained must all help to look after the young to insure they know their faith so well that they do not fall for the poor arguments for atheism.  This means pastors must implement rigorous programs for the people God has entrusted to them.

Pastor Matt lays the blame squarely on pastors for at least some of the problem. And I agree with him. But Dr. Craig asserted in his podcast that pastors should not be responsible to learn apologetics, because they were too busy with all the other duties that pastors have to do. He gave some examples, but they were things like weddings, counseling children about drugs and marriage counseling.

So what I wanted to say about this is that Pastor Matt is right and Dr. Craig is wrong. A pastor should have at least put in the time to learn apologetics so that he is able to inject it into his sermon, where appropriate, and point people to where they can find answers when asked. It seems to me that if you are going to get up there and preach about a bunch of things, then you’d better know at least a little about why those things are true. And it can’t just be “because the Bible says so” or because “that’s just how I was raised”. Respect for the truth claims of Christianity has to come from the top, even if the pastor leverages the skills of people in the church to address different issues in more detail.

Pastor Matt responded to Dr. Craig in this post.

Excerpt:

The biggest disagreement I have with Dr. Craig is that he argues pastors are too busy to be trained in apologetics.  As a pastor and the son of a pastor, I strongly differ!  Unfortunately, what I have witnessed (and heard from several seasoned pastors of very large churches) is that too many pastors are in fact lazy.  I have heard from half a dozen leaders of churches of more than 10,000 that they cannot find young seminary grads who will put in even 40 solid hours a week!  Those statements may ruffle a few feathers and certainly there are hard-working, if not overworked pastors out there but they are apparently few and far between.

Also, pastors often try to do things they shouldn’t do.  As a lawyer who used to defend churches, ministers often get into trouble for counseling those with serious issues that are beyond their training and experience.  A person with addiction issues needs something like Celebrate Recovery, a person with emotional problems needs a licensed professional counselor.  Ministers need to recognize their limits and engage in areas that they can and must address instead of those that are already well covered by other trained professionals.

But to be fair to Dr. Craig, I think he may have misunderstood what I mean by training.  I don’t mean a pastor has to earn a master’s degree or doctorate in apologetics or philosophy.  There are many short but effective training programs out there such as his own Defenders class, the distance certificate from BIOLA, Frank Turek’s short but intense CrossExamined program (that I am attending this week), etc.

I agree with Dr. Craig that we should train layman to create an apologetics team in our churches (see this post) but the pastor has to take the lead.  No pastor can expect his or her church to do what he or she is not willing to do.  If the pastor doesn’t evangelize, the church won’t.  If the pastor is not studying the Bible carefully, the church won’t.  Also, any pastor working in today’s post-Christian culture must know how to meet the challenges of said culture.  It is just part of the gig.  So, every minister should seek some type of solid apologetics training and commit to regular study on the subject as well as subscribe to certain podcasts such as Reasonable Faith.

I wanted to add that I didn’t agree with any of the other points where Dr. Craig disagreed with Pastor Matt. It was really surprising to me, but I think Pastor Matt is right across the board. Leadership starts from the top – how are you supposed to be able to assess different people’s requests to teach apologetics or bring in speakers if you are not comfortable discerning what is good and what isn’t yourself? If the pastor is going to be making those kinds of decisions, then he has to understand apologetics to some degree. Maybe not with formal training, but as much as a typical blogger like me would. Also, don’t you find it weird – the idea that a pastor can get up there and preach on things to people and not be able to show anyone some reasons why these things are true? Christians have to be ready to give an answer, and that answer cannot just be “because the Bible says so”.

5 thoughts on “Do pastors have a responsibility to know apologetics?”

  1. I have to agree with Pastor Matt on this one. If the church’s most visible leader is not prepared to lead from the front, then he cannot expect his flock to go in any particular direction. In the church I attend, the pastor will not use the sermon for teaching, and surprise,surprise, most of the congregation do not know their bible. He says that this is the job of the house groups, but will he push house group attendance from the front of the church of when chairing a church meeting? In 12 years I have never heard him do so. So I am part of the fastest-declining mainstream denomination in the UK, because he is not alone.

    Like

  2. I have to agree with you on this one, WK. Most seminaries have plenty of apologetics courses – surely the budding pastor can take just a single introductory one and supplement later on with a few solid books, like Reasonable Faith, etc. Apologetics books, even just popular ones, are instrumental in witnessing, and I think (hope?) that one of the teaching purposes for pastors is to improve the witnessing capabilities of his flock.

    You can get 90% of effective apologetics from popular apologetics books, IMO – not debate level, but personal level; my former pastor used his tremendous knowledge of Greek to use that as a doorway into apologetics teaching during his sermons. Besides, someone like Geisler seems to do a pretty solid job on both theology and apologetics. But, he is rare air.

    Perhaps I am overstating it, but it seems like the great preachers of the 18th and 19th centuries used some form of evidential apologetics, Biblically grounded of course, in their hard-hitting sermons as a way of witnessing to their listeners. Maybe they HAD to do so, since it was rare for them to have a sermon in which they did not question the salvation of everyone present. :-) If you are going to do that, you better have some solid proofs or road maps for your position, other than “just believe, fairy tale or not.” You need to give your listeners a way to escape Hell, if you are going to accuse them of being headed there.

    Like

    1. Pastors should at least know as much as you and I do. A course and some books – that’s all we are asking for! I think pastors today have even more reason to have apologetics than the ones from the past, because now we have real challenges to belief out there in the culture. Can’t preach like it’s 1814, because it’s 2014.

      Like

  3. Amen! I was shocked at Dr. Craig’s comments, and think maybe he meant the pastor wouldn’t need to teach a full time apologetics class or something, I want to give him the benefit of the doubt, but clearly Pastors need a solid apologetic foundation.

    Like

  4. I don’t mean to start an echo chamber here in the comments section, but I completely agree with Pastor Matt and WK on this one.
    Pastors at a minimum need a working knowledge of the key apologetics arguments as to why Christianity is true beyond just saying “because the Bible says so” or “because I had an intense personal experience”
    The former will have no impact on a non-believer and the latter could be said by anyone of any faith (Muslim, Mormon etc).

    Like

Leave a reply to Wintery Knight Cancel reply