Why doesn’t God give us more evidence of his existence?

Have you ever heard someone say that if God existed, he would give us more evidence? This is called the “hiddenness of God” argument. It’s also known as the argument from “rational non-belief”.

Basically the argument is something like this:

  1. God is all powerful
  2. God is all loving
  3. God wants all people to know about him
  4. Some people don’t know about him
  5. Therefore, there is no God.

You may hear have heard this argument before, when talking to atheists, as in William Lane Craig’s debate with Theodore Drange, (audio, video).

Basically, the atheist is saying that he’s looked for God real hard and that if God were there, he should have found him by now. After all, God can do anything he wants that’s logically possible, and he wants us to know that he exists. To defeat the argument we need to find a possible explanation of why God would want to remain hidden when our eternal destination depends on our knowledge of his existence.

What reason could God have for remaining hidden?

Dr. Michael Murray, a brilliant professor of philosophy at Franklin & Marshall College, has found a reason for God to remain hidden.

His paper on divine hiddenness is here:
Coercion and the Hiddenness of God“, American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol 30, 1993.

He argues that if God reveals himself too much to people, he takes away our freedom to make morally-significant decisions, including responding to his self-revelation to us. Murray argues that God stays somewhat hidden, so that he gives people space to either 1) respond to God, or 2) avoid God so we can keep our autonomy from him. God places a higher value on people having the free will to respond to him, and if he shows too much of himself he takes away their free choice to respond to him, because once he is too overt about his existence, people will just feel obligated to belief in him in order to avoid being punished.

But believing in God just to avoid punishment is NOT what God wants for us. If it is too obvious to us that God exists and that he really will judge us, then people will respond to him and behave morally out of self-preservation. But God wants us to respond to him out of interest in him, just like we might try to get to know someone we admire. God has to dial down the immediacy of the threat of judgment, and the probability that the threat is actual. That leaves it up to us to respond to God’s veiled revelation of himself to us, in nature and in Scripture.

(Note: I think that we don’t seek God on our own, and that he must take the initiative to reach out to us and draw us to him. But I do think that we are free to resist his revelation, at which point God stops himself short of coercing our will. We are therefore responsible for our own fate).

The atheist’s argument is a logical/deductive argument. It aims to show that there is a contradiction between God’s will for us and his hiding from us. In order to derive a contradiction, God MUST NOT have any possible reason to remain hidden. If he has a reason for remaining hidden that is consistent with his goodness, then the argument will not go through.

When Murray offers a possible reason for God to remain hidden in order to allow people to freely respond to him, then the argument is defeated. God wants people to respond to him freely so that there is a genuine love relationship – not coercion by overt threat of damnation. To rescue the argument, the atheist has to be able to prove that God could provide more evidence of his existence without interfering with the free choice of his creatures to reject him.

More of Michael Murray’s work

Murray has defended the argument in works published by prestigious academic presses such as Cambridge University Press, (ISBN: 0521006104, 2001) and Routledge (ISBN: 0415380383, 2007). The book chapter from the Cambridge book is here. The book chapter from the Routledge book is here.

Michael Murray’s papers are really fun to read, because he uses hilarious examples. I should mention that I disagree with his view that God’s work of introducing biological information in living creatures has to be front-loaded.

Here’s more terrific stuff from Dr. Murray:

Is there any evidence of God’s existence?

Yes, just watch this lecture by Dr. William Lane Craig. It contains 5 reasons why God exists and 3 reasons why it matters.

Positive arguments for Christian theism

4 thoughts on “Why doesn’t God give us more evidence of his existence?”

  1. I think the argument needs a little more refinement. Obviously, we could reject Him even with full knowledge of Him and access to Him since this is the condition that Satan and his minions are in. In fact, the unpardonable sin as stated by Jesus Himself is blasphemy against the Spirit (or rejection of the Holy Spirit, depending on translation) which logically means that the blasphemer must first be aware of the Holy Spirit.

    So, to split hairs, I think it is logical that God does not give us more evidence not because He fears we will lose free will, but to separate the wheat from the chaff. Remember, because of His holiness, He cannot countenance sin, but someone who only worships Him out of fear will harbor sin in his heart. How can that person stand before God without being rejected? And how can God keep His promise to wash us of all sin if we all knew Him and only feared Him while harboring sin, instead of putting our faith in Him and loving Him which by necessity means rejecting our sinful nature*?

    * I am not saying that those with faith are without sin, but that they love God and hate their own sin.

  2. A response to a point in Dr. Murray’s argument: “If it is too obvious to us that God exists and that he really will judge us, then people will respond to him and behave morally out of self-preservation.”

    I like the article and agree completely that our response needs to be out of a genuine desire for a relationship with GOD and not a coerced response or a response out of fear; however, I would point out that GOD’s existence was completely obvious to the children of Israel as they wandered through the desert for 40 years and their response was not moral behavior or self-preservation. In fact, it was quite the opposite.

    I wish I could believe today that if GOD manifested Himself to me as He did to them my behavior would be flawless and sinless but sadly, I am just as prone to depravity as they were and am grateful that the Spirit has opened my eyes to my depravity and my need for a Savior.

    GOD bless.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s