Christina Hoff Sommers takes on sexual harassment hysteria on campus

Christina Hoff Sommers
Christina Hoff Sommers

Christina Hoff Sommers writes about feminism gone wild in the Chronicle of Higher Education.


American courts take exacting precautions to avoid convicting an innocent person of a crime. It was therefore startling to read the April 4, 2011, directive on sexual violence sent by the U.S. Department of Education’s assistant secretary for civil rights, Russlynn H. Ali, to college officials across the country. In an effort to make campuses safe and equitable for women, Ali, with the full support of her department, advocates procedures that are unjust to men.

[…]Marching under the banner of Title IX and freed of high standards of proof, campus disciplinary committees, once relatively weak and feckless, will be transformed into powerful instruments of gender justice. At least, that is the fantasy. But here is the reality: Campus disciplinary committees—often a casual mix of professors, students, and an assistant dean or two—are well suited to resolving cases involving purported plagiarism and cheating, and violations of college rules on drugs and alcohol. But no one considers them prepared to adjudicate murder, arson, or kidnapping cases, or criminal assault. They lack the training and the resources to investigate and adjudicate felonies. So why are they expected to determine guilt or innocence in cases of rape?

As with murder and arson, serious charges of sexual assault should be left to the police and the courts. The Department of Education should not pressure universities to enact a system whereby a student can be found guilty of a major crime by a mere preponderance of evidence.

[…]Being a victim of rape is uniquely horrific, but being accused of rape is not far behind. If the person is guilty, then the suffering is deserved. But what if he is innocent? To be found guilty of rape by a campus tribunal can mean both expulsion and a career-destroying black mark on your permanent record. Such occurrences could become routine under the Ali dispensation.

So why is Ali taking such draconian measures? Because she asserts that rape on campuses has reached epidemic levels, citing a study that states that 19 percent, or almost one in five women, will be a victim of assault or attempted assault during their college years.

But is that figure accurate or even plausible? Research on sexual assault is notoriously hard to conduct, and the studies are wildly inconsistent. A 2003 Bureau of Justice Statistics special report, “Violent Victimization of College Students, 1995-2002,” found that among the nation’s nearly four million female college students, there were six rapes or sexual assaults per thousand per year during the years surveyed. That comes to one victim in 40 students during four years of college—too many, of course, but vastly fewer than Ali’s one in five.

The study cited by Ali used an online survey, conducted under a grant from the Justice Department, in which college women were asked about their sexual experiences, on campus and off, and the researchers—not the women themselves—decided whether they had been assaulted. The researchers employed an expansive definition of sexual assault that included “forced kissing” and even “attempted” forced kissing. The survey also asked subjects if they had sexual contact with someone when they were unable to give consent because they were drunk. A “yes” answer was automatically counted as a rape or assault. According to the authors, “an intoxicated person cannot legally consent to sexual contact.”

Surely, reasonable people can disagree on that: If sexual intimacy under the influence of alcohol is by definition assault, then a significant percentage of sexual intercourse throughout the world and down the ages qualifies as crime.

The Justice Department stamped a disclaimer on every page of the survey report, advising that it is not a publication of the Justice Department and does not necessarily reflect its positions or policies. Ali, however, treats it as an official government finding and ignores the controversies and ambiguities surrounding her “one in five” figure.

I’m a huge fan of Christina Hoff Sommers. I really recommend her book “The War Against Boys”. Must-reading for any parent. The article notes in the author bio that she is working on an updated version of that book, and you can bet this topic will be covered.

3 thoughts on “Christina Hoff Sommers takes on sexual harassment hysteria on campus”

  1. So why is Ali taking such draconian measures? Because she asserts that rape on campuses has reached epidemic levels, citing a study that states that 19 percent, or almost one in five women, will be a victim of assault or attempted assault during their college years.

    So what liberals are saying is this: after fifty years of the Pill, forty years of sexual liberation, countless Womyn’s Studies courses, classes like the one at Northwestern, the total divorce of sexuality from morality has resulting in increased rape?

    Are they really saying that when you tell men from infancy onward that all healthy women enjoy sex, and that sex is just fun and only repressed people wait until marriage, that men see nothing wrong with forcing their way towards that fun, healthy, fulfilling activity?

    NO FREAKIN KIDDING that’s what happens, but I doubt that the femisogynists will understand that their much-touted rape statistics are, if true (biiiig caveat) the direct result of their own ideology. Once sex stops being special, emotional, and moral, “encouraging” someone to do it is like “persuading” someone to eat no-calorie ice cream.


    1. I’m not so sure we are far apart on this. I think we agree completely on this.

      One thing though – why are men so busy playing video games and watching sports when they should be thinking about how to make their marriage and children count for God? If they really believed in God, and wanted to be HIS FRIEND, then they would make everything count for him. Including governing themselves sexually with the view of safeguarding their future marriage! Most men eventually marry (I think) and I want to know why they are putting in so much time pursuing premarital sex, and so little time thinking through what kind of a woman they should be marrying, and what kind of children they want to produce. I make it a requirement that all women I want to date have a graduate degree, either before the marriage or during. Why? So that she can shepherd the children on to graduate school. It just helps to have someone who is educated and capable – she has to co-pilot the family, and you need someone competent. Focusing too much on sex and too little on choosing the right woman for marriage is a mistake.


  2. “..why are men so busy playing video games and watching sports ”

    A horredously Misandric generalisation. Up there with fried chicken and water melons.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s