Well it’s Friday, and I did find something funny.
“Do you want that shoe back?”
UPDATE: Well, I feel obligated to post a Michele Bachmann video to even things out.
And more:
And here’s one from Gateway Pundit:
Happy Friday!
Tag Archives: Funny
This evil satire of Calvinism is not funny at all!!!
I don’t even think you should read it. It’s so evil!
Excerpt:
In this post I would like to look at the extent of the atonement. By using proper exegesis of scripture it can be proven with certainty that Jesus died to effectually secure salvation for Paul of Tarsus. And for Paul alone.
First, let’s take a look at Galatians 2:20. This is the most important verse in the Bible, because it explicitly states the extent of the atonement (bold mine):
“I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.”
This verse is key. It indisputably proves that Jesus loved and gave himself only for Paul.
And:
In Matthew 18:12 we learn that the shepherd only wanted to save one sheep. In fact he abandoned 99 sheep to save the one (bold mine):
“What do you think? If a man owns a hundred sheep, and one of them wanders away, will he not leave the ninety-nine on the hills and go to look for the one that wandered off?”
This passage is so clear. It proves beyond the shadow of a doubt that the shepherd found and saved only one sheep (Paul). The shepherd left the 99 other sheep on the hills. By doing this the shepherd maximized his glory. Moreover, he increased the appreciation and adoration of Paul, whom was effectually retrieved. If other sheep could have been retrieved, it would have diluted the value of the shepherd’s act.
This is so awful, that I have no words to describe how awful! Awful!
Here’s another thing that you shouldn’t read!
All kidding aside, I do believe in definite atonement. Sufficient for all, efficient for some, based on God’s foreknowledge of who would respond to his taking the initiative to draw a specific group of people toward him, who did not want him at all, but who he knew would freely responding to his loving them FIRST.
I apologize to all of my Calvinist readers for posting this. Please forgive me. You have to allow me my fun once in a while. Isn’t that what friendship is all about?
Friday night funny: Obama’s magic speeches and wise Latina writings
Scrappleface reports that Obama’s Cairo speech has worked!
“I suppose I’ve been a bit unreasonable, testy, even dictatorial at times,” said the contrite Iranian leader. “After that speech, I feel like my eyes have been opened. How could I have missed all of the common ground we share with America and Israel. I’m going to have Barack over to the house, and let him know that Iran’s nuclear ambitions can take a back seat to our desire for true brotherhood and unity. And boy, do I ever owe those Jews a big apology?”
According to Press Secretary Gibbs, Obama plans a similar speech… for atheists:
“Most peace-loving atheists want nothing more than to be left alone to pursue sensory stimulus, pass along their DNA, and then to allow their carbon molecules to reunite with the soil,” said Gibbs, “but instead they bear the reproach of those who blame them for the actions of Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and George Soros.
…Like most Americans, atheists want safety for their offspring, those charming little vessels of genetic code,” said Gibbs. “They want the right to elect representatives who will make laws guaranteeing survival of the fittest. They want freedom to speak whatever ideas the electro-chemical reactions in their brains happen to produce….”
Steven Crowder meets Alfonzo Rachel, and they explain what Republicans are really like. (H/T 4Simpsons, Hot Air)
Oh, I know I’m just like those two! Well, I look more like Zo than Crowder.
Here are some of Ronald Reagan’s best lines: (H/T Club For Growth)
Barney Frank’s fascist tendencies are showing: (H/T Michelle Malkin)
You can also read some of the wise Latina’s writings. (H/T Muddling Towards Maturity)
LifeNews reports on her interview with Senator Demint:
“When I asked if an unborn child has any rights whatsoever, I was surprised that she said she had never thought about it,” he said. “This is not just a question about abortion, but about respect due to human life at all stages — and I hope this is cleared up in her hearings.”
Happy Friday!
WINTERY KNIGHT 