Pussy Hat Feminists

Should Christian men consider single mothers for marriage?

Why Christians object to warning men about high-risk relationships?
Why do Christians object to warning men about high-risk relationships?

A while back, I explained my three concerns about attending church. One of them was that male pastors and church leaders have adopted the priorities of radical feminism, and have turned against men who want a traditional marriage in which the man leads and the wife supports. Well, I found something that really illustrates what I mean by that, so that everyone will understand it.

Above, you can see a tweet by Michael Foster, a pastor who hosts a podcast called “It’s Good to be a Man”. His web site states that his goal is: “Extending God’s house & father-rule by helping men to establish their own houses in strength, workmanship & wisdom.”

He explains in subsequent tweets that he is just urging men to ask questions to find out how the woman became a single mother.

Reactions to the tweet

Here are some reactions to the tweet:

The negative reactions are all anti-intellectual and childish, especially trying to refute statistics with “you hurt my feelings” or telling a single personal story as a counterexample.

Here’s a disclaimer. In this post, I am talking about single mothers by choice, and single mothers who initiated divorce. Widows are excluded.

The risks posed by single mothers

Now, let’s improve Foster’s warning, by looking at some evidence – is a marriage to a single mother really more likely to result in a bad outcome?

First of all, women initiate 70% of divorces. If you meet a woman who divorced her husband, she either had a defect in her ability to evaluate and choose a man, or she had a defect in her ability to maintain a commitment to the man she chose. Either way, a woman who divorced her previous husband has red flags. There are two possibilities. She either chose a good man or she chose a bad man. If she chose a bad man, then it shows that she didn’t choose a man with good moral character and spiritual leadership. That means that those things were low priorities for her when deciding who to get naked with. Alternatively, she married a good man, and failed to maintain the commitment. Then she has different problems: problems with male leadership, problems with responsibilities, problems with commitment, problems with contentment, etc. You need to ask questions to get to the bottom of what happened, and more importantly, what she has studied and done to change her worldview. Don’t take her words for it, look at her actions.

Second, the number of premarital sex partners a woman has makes her a higher risk of divorce. The more sex partners, the more risk. The problem with women who engage in sex with men who don’t commit to them is that they necessarily don’t see a man’s willingness and ability to commit as valuable when choosing a man. Women who have premarital sex with men who don’t commit see OTHER THINGS as more valuable. They are rewarding the man for his height, his muscles, his tattoos, his piercings, his entertainment of her, etc. A good man should be very wary when a woman who gave her best youth, beauty and sexual interest to men like that now want to “settle” for a boring, unattractive provider who they see as having lower value than the men they gave sex to without requiring a commitment. What they really wanted was bad boys, and they threw sex at those bad boys without asking for commitment. With the man they perceive as low-level, they are insisting on commitment first, because they don’t want this low-level man as badly as they wanted the bad boy. They are settling for less than they feel they deserve. This is where sex-withholding, feelings of unhappiness, and frivolous divorces come from. And by the way, hollering Jesus doesn’t fix that risk any more than hollering Jesus fixes student loans accumulated for a useless non-STEM degree. Jesus-hollering isn’t evidence that a woman has persuaded herself to change her view of which men are the most attractive. A woman’s lack of respect for men who prepare for commitment and who keep their commitments is dangerous for marital stability. The hysterical reactions to a man’s judging a woman for her past mistakes don’t cancel the damage and risks caused by those mistakes. They simply tell the man that this woman is unrepentant, and therefore unteachable, and likely unsuitable for goal-oriented marriage. She is not qualified for the job of wife: self-sacrificial love for her husband, respect for her husband, and supporting her husband in what he is trying to achieve for God.

Here’s what the Bible says about sex outside of heterosexual marriage and about frivolous divorce. Read the critical replies to Foster’s tweet. The critical responses show the default position of church-attending Christian women and pastors to the Bible in this culture. First, the critics don’t accept the Bible as an authority over women’s choices in any area of life. Second, the critics don’t believe that women should bear any responsibility for their past actions. Nobody believes that women choosing bad men is the woman’s fault in this society. So you should assume that single mothers don’t take responsibility for their own failures. And that means that she will have taken no steps to repent of her mistake, and change her character so that she doesn’t make the same mistake again. It’s up to you to look at what she has been reading, listening to, watching, etc. and to check her actions in order to find out what she really thinks about what the Bible says. You can’t marry a woman who responds to any mention of the moral law and moral obligations with denial of responsibility and insults. If she hasn’t become an active crusader against women who choose bad men, and women who choose premarital sex, and women who choose divorce, then you can’t really believe that there’s been any real repentance. The risks to you are too high to take a chance on someone who is not certain. I’ve only ever met one single mother (Kerri) who blamed her own divorce on her own bad decisions.

The culture opposes male leadership

Foster’s warning is intended to help men to make better decisions, so that their relationships will produce results for God. But his critics aren’t interested in what men are trying to achieve for God. They are only concerned that women get what they want, regardles of their past actions. In their opinion, men exists solely to serve the needs of women. Women don’t have to be good enough for marriage, men just have to give them what they want regardless of the woman’s suitability for wife and mother roles. The role of men in any relationship is not to lead and achieve goals for God. Their role is to let women rule over them, disposing of their earnings as they see fit, for the benefit of the woman.

When women are young and pretty, they are entitled to hot bad boys to entertain them. When they are older, have tons of sexual experience, and children from different fathers, they are entitled to a husband to financially support them. But a husband with no power to lead the home, since their past choices of man showed they have no interest in following a man who has good character. And the churches, pastors, courts, schools, hospitals, etc. are all there to enforce this view of men as clowns / slaves.

This is what women are told about the role of men in every area of society. This society, including the Christian parents, Christian pastors, Christian culture, etc. do not produce women who prefer early marriage to men who are good at moral leadership and spiritual leadership. Therefore, men who are chaste, sober, have good educations, good private sector jobs, good savings, etc. need to be extremely careful. Look at the responses to Foster’s tweet, and think: do these people care about providing you with a good wife? Or is their concern all about how to insult you and shame you, until you are submissive to her needs?

Your marriage is your enterprise for serving God

My advice to men right now is to read over every single critical tweet in that thread that Foster started. Imagine that you are trying to get these women to do something in a marriage that is part of your plan to make the marriage serve God. You’re trying to get her to watch a William Lane Craig debate. You’re trying to get her to stop spending money on 50 Shades of Grey and Harry Potter. You’re trying to get her to stop smoking and drinking. You’re trying to get her to talk about the sermon instead of essential oils. You’re trying to get her to read a Thomas Sowell book. You’re trying to get her to not put the kids in day care or public schools.

You need to assume that her response to male leadership like this will be the exact same as the responses that Foster is getting to his tweet. And then after you have assumed it, then you need to keep your hands off that woman. Keep your distance, and ask her questions to find out what her real views are, and whether she is interested in growing into the kind of person who is safe for you to marry. Don’t forget that chastity and sobriety are important during the evaluation process, so that you aren’t influenced away from your leadership role. Don’t listen to her words, look at her actions.

10 thoughts on “Should Christian men consider single mothers for marriage?”

  1. This just makes me that much happier that I quit dating entirely. I would certainly have liked a good, loving and faithful woman, but life is far better single than with the ones the pastors try to shove down our throats. And I see thise pastors aren’t marrying those either. Nor are they encouraging their sons, nephews, etc. to marry them either. Nope, that’s just for the pew peons.


  2. This goes FAR beyond single women with children to ALL women in this Age of Jezebel. What man doesn’t want a virgin?!? I was a liberal atheist and knew I was going to have a virgin and be one too. The “christians” nowadays don’t even know this! But, they are lukewarm on child sacrifice and the Alphabet Mafia too, so that tells you everything.

    Don’t get me started on the soyboy “pastors,” WK, because then I will fill up your comment section. If I saw one pastor, just one, regularly preaching on Hell, abortion, sodomite “marriage,” divorce, transgendering children, etc, then I might listen to him. I’m talking about full-length exegetical sermons with supporting philosophical and scientific evidence, not a casual mention once a year or a Crumbs for the Unborn sermon in January. But, there are exceedingly few men of God in the pulpits because their goal is to fill up the pews instead of filling up souls.

    And don’t forget, WK, that women lie. It’s natural for them. They lie in the morning, they lie all day long. They lie about rape, they lie about the reasons for their divorces (think of all of the times that the word “abuse” is spiritualized by them!), they lie about their past, they even lie about their true sex nowadays. What makes you think that the “story” you get from them concerning their past is even remotely related to the truth?!?

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Great advice. There are always exceptions, but they are rare. I’ve seen countless analyses of single moms insisting that their children come first, that they are done playing “games,” they want to get serious, etc. That means they slept around and now want a beta chump to pay for their bad decisions. Men need to be careful. One woman almost got her husband to legally adopt her child right before she was going to divorce him. He would have been on the hook until the child was 18.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. That may have been similar to the story where a nice charitable man decided to help out a single Mom by caring for her child while she was working. There wasn’t any relationship to my knowledge – he was just being a great guy.

      When he stopped, she sued him for child support. I THINK she lost, but who knows in this upside-down world? Regardless, it is a dire warning for any man to even offer charity to a single Mom these days, much less pursue a relationship.


  4. I’ll come at it from a different point of view to say what hasn’t already been said.

    We’ve covered in the past widows — and as you brought up above, war widows. I know of some unfortunate other circumstances (e.g., widowed due to 9/11, cancer, accident, etc.) but the people should be evaluated on a case-by-case scenario.

    A single mother may have to choose between her biology which is telling her that “her kids are top priority” and (if she is being biblical) “her husband is her top priority.”

    Sneaking in a side comment: there is a bit of a double standard —
    When a man’s wife has cancer, mental health issues, becomes handicapped/disabled, etc. he is lauded for sticking with her through thick and thin (and conversely, he is butchered if he abandons her).

    If a woman has a husband who has mental health issues, etc. she is encouraged to “celebrate” her independence and emancipation from marriage??

    Another way to look at it is: do you have options? (When I was much younger, before I got married, divorcees started showing up in my social scene whether in-person or online. While I think God can give grace such that Christians are able to bear each others’ burdens, I am realistic in asking “Do I want to saddle myself with those kinds of issues? Do I have other options?” not to mention theological ones like whether her divorce was legitimate as per the Bible.)

    Most of the time when dealing with divorces (much less single mothers), I’d be polite (I found out the hard way not to be too truthful) and claim something like “I think we’ll just be friends” or “I see as just being friends” or if pushed “Yeah, I’m not feeling like it” or some other code phrase. As you’ve notice with the reactions to Foster’s tweet, Beware the Yentas.

    (Insider tip while I am reminded: I also highly recommend vetting when it comes to dating — not just to WK but to WK’s readership.

    Talk with her friends, family, pastor, fellow Christians and preferably fellow Christian leaders, etc. Watch her in action. See how she is involved and try to discern why.

    If her Christian friends and family are solid, they’re going to vet you too.

    We do a lot more vetting for jobs or for Christian leadership positions than in dating a lot of the time.)

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s