Who’s better at managing money – Republicans or Democrats?

One of the best jobs for managing money is being governor of a state. So, let’s take a look at the 50 states and see which ones have the best governors for managing money.

Here’s a new report from George Mason University, and it’s written up in Investors Business Daily.

IBD says:

A new report from George Mason University’s Mercatus Center ranks all 50 states based on 14 measures designed to determine whether states can pay their short-term bills and meet their long-term obligations — debt, pension liabilities and such. The data go through 2013.

The best-run states have enough cash to pay its current bills, enough revenue coming in to meet its fiscal year needs, a cushion for economic shocks, and management long-term liabilities.

The worst states, in contrast, have “tens, if not hundreds, of billions of dollars in unfunded liabilities — constituting a significant risk to taxpayers in both the short and the long term.”

[…]There’s only one factor these fiscal winners and losers share in common. And that’s their political leanings. Of the top 10 states in the Mercatus ranking, just two — Florida and Ohio — voted for the Democratic presidential candidate in the past four elections, and just one — Montana — has a Democratic governor. Even if you look at the 25 best-performing states, only three could be considered reliably liberal.

At the other end of the list, just two of the 10 lowest-ranked states — Kentucky and West Virginia — have voted for the Republican in the past four presidential elections. And while four of them have Republican governors, they all are in solid blue states and all were elected to clean up messes left by their Democratic predecessors.

It’s also worth noting that these same states consistently show up at the top and bottom of other lists that measure business friendliness, tax burden and economic freedom.

In fact, six of the 10 worst-performing states in the Mercatus ranking — California, New York, Illinois, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Connecticut — are also states with the heaviest tax burdens and rated the least business friendly, according to rankings from the Tax Foundation and Chief Executive magazine.

It would appear, then, that abiding by a philosophy of limited government, lower taxes and fewer regulations leads to growth, prosperity and fiscal soundness.

Here’s the full map from the George Mason University study:

George Mason University study on fiscal solvency
George Mason University study on fiscal solvency

At the state-level, everyone understands that Republican governors know what they are doing, because they understand economics. So then why do we forget that and elect a community organizer when it comes to the Presidency? Do we just not care about the debts we are piling onto our children when we elect wastrels and profligates?

7 thoughts on “Who’s better at managing money – Republicans or Democrats?”

  1. The question is for who are they making money. Most of that valuable resources are squandered on salaries and socialist agendas in other states. I would also state that the governors themselves aren’t the ones making the money. But they are attracting money making opportunities through minimalist government policies. I think its safe to say if there weren’t any representatives there would be even more wealth. And without a federal centralized government. Almost 100% of resources would be spent in areas government was instated for.


      1. Yes IF we stuck to it.I believe it was Jefferson who said the constitution would be abandoned in 200 years.


      1. The question is since republicans proved less taxes equals more prosperity, why do taxes still exist? Can’t the majority of functions government currently hold a monopoly over be taken over by those actually creating wealth? People have this irrational fear of business and for profit industries ruining their lives and limiting their freedom, when its quite the opposite with no evidence to the former.


  2. I live in the Soviet Socialist Republic of Connecticut. I’m mystified as to why they always keep electing left-wing Democrats. Businesses and productive taxpayers can’t wait to leave the state. Although in all fairness, I don’t think the current governor, Malloy, is a leftist as much as a corrupt, crony politician trying to grab as much as he can while he can. The only reason I can think of is that many people for some reason “feel better” about voting for Democrats. I think the “evil Republican” meme has been drummed into their heads by the media. Another is that there is a huge number of people here living off the taxpayers (that includes the municipal unions). They are a substantial percent of the voting population and of course will always vote to keep the gravy train running.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s