I blogged on the stories of some of these groups when they were de-recognized for “discriminating” against non-Christians.
Now we hear from the College Fix about what happened next.
Excerpt:
This school year, CSU administrators labeled campus Christian groups that refuse to allow non-Christians to lead them “discriminatory.” As a result, Christian clubs at Cal State universities that refused to change their constitutions and check boxes saying they would allow non-Christians as leaders have been officially derecognized by their campus communities.
They’ve been scrubbed from campus websites and directories. They cannot take part in events that help campus clubs recruit new members and gain visibility. They are charged a more expensive, outsider fee to rent rooms on campus – straining their already tight coffers. They’ve lost a chance to receive a portion of student fees collected to help clubs on campuses thrive.
[…]Before Cal Poly’s Cru chapter was derecognized, student Bible study leaders normally had 10 to 20 people come to their weekly Bible Studies. More recently, only two people showed up, Cal Poly senior Courtney Shipp, a former Cru member, told The College Fix.
And Greg Jao, InterVarsity Christian Fellowship’s national field director, told The College Fix that Chico State’s chapter – one of the bigger InterVarsity chapters – lost 50 members due to the new policy.
[…]At Cal Poly, Cru can no longer reserve a room on campus as an organization, and must reserve rooms as an outside organization. That cost went from zero to $6,000 a year under the new policy, he said.
Josh Otto, Chico State’s Cru director, told The College Fix that the cost for them to reserve a room went from being for free for the entire year to $900 for one-time use.
[…]Leaders of Cru, formerly known as Campus Crusade for Christ, as well as the two other Christian clubs at San Luis Obispo that were derecognized – InterVarsity Christian Fellowship and Chinese Christian Fellowship – have insisted that they couldn’t allow any non-Christians to be leaders.
“We have no issue with anybody of any kind of race, religion coming to our weekly meetings and being a part of who we are,” San Luis Obispo Missionary Leader Jamey Pappas said. “It’s a question of who’s going to be leading our students in a Bible Study, mentoring them individually, or deciding what kind of content goes into our weekly meeting, and we want people who agree with what we’re about.”
[…]At Chico, the Cru chapter used to receive $1,000 in funding from student government when they were recognized on campus. They will no longer receive that funding.
[…]“Two of my roommates are Bible Study leaders of Cru and they each have between ten and fifteen students that they are working with,” Shipp said. “Last week, Melanie Reis had no one show up to her Bible Study. Sarah Sampson only had two girls.”
[…]Making matters worse, Chico Cru also suffered a drop in attendance since they had to move their weekly meetings to a church seven blocks away from campus. Most of the losses were due to freshmen being unable to go to the meetings off-campus.
“We probably lost about 50 people,” Otto said. “We were about 160, 170 before that. Now we’re down to 120.”
Now think of this – the students have to pay the same fees to the university that are then used to fund other organizations on campus. But they don’t get the same access to the facilities. Does that seem right to you? And this is happening in 23 California State universities, according to the article. I am surprised that there hasn’t been a lawsuit yet, but it’s a bad sign to me – it makes me think that this is going to stick and even spread.
My, my… its rather like watching a chess-player backing their opponent into a rather nasty corner. Its quite ingenious when you think about it.
Tell me, does this discriminatory policy apply only to Christian groups or are other religious and ideological groups affected by it? The crazy logic of it seems that it should apply to literally any exclusive group.
LikeLike
College Republicans are also affected.
LikeLike
What about College Democrats? If I were the conservatives on these campuses, I’d immediately start taking over the smallest liberal groups. The vegan group won’t be vegan anymore. The Greens will start supporting Constitution Party candidates. Heck, maybe one day the holy grail can be taken and the LGBTQIAA…. group will be the firmest supporters of traditional marriage on campus. If they want absurdity, let them eat it.
LikeLike
I think this is a little bit better in Australia. I’m part of a Christian student group in the University of Queensland, and as far as I know, there’s never been any problem with this. We have a doctrinal statement that you have to agree with to become an official member, but we encourage everyone to attend our Bible talks.
Being part of the group has helped me to realise just how important this is. I think every Christian student should find a Christian group to join on campus, to help them hold on to the faith in a very formative part of their lives, where they are often surrounded by hostility towards Christianity. Universities are a key point in the contention between God and the world, and it’s critical that we maintain a presence there.
LikeLike
What would happen if Christians were to apply to join, say, an atheist group, and nominate their own leadership candidate? Would they be refused? On what grounds?
LikeLike
I think the ACLU should be called in on this. That’s like saying a Mason group has to have a non-Mason as a leader. That’s like saying an atheist group has to allow Christian leaders… LOL… And this decision was brought down from so-called academic leaders? WOW!!! This sounds, smells, and looks like prejudice to me against Conservatives and Christians…
LikeLike