Doug Ross writes about it at Director Blue.
Excerpt:
In celebrating Ohio’s comeback, Obama is unintentionally repudiating his own policies. It turns out that, in spite of Obama, Ohio is 4th in the nation in job creation and tops in the Midwest. In the previous four years before Republican Gov. Kasich came into office, Ohio was 48th.
Even the states that are ahead of Ohio in job creation are far larger. Check out the other members of the top five job-creating states: Texas, New York, California and Florida. All are far more populous than Ohio. Florida, for instance, has 6.5 million more people, yet Ohio edged it out in job creation.
In fact, February’s BLS data showed that Ohio created more jobs than any other state. When was the last time that happened? Can’t tell, because the BLS doesn’t offer data prior to the Clinton era, so it’s been at least that long.
In short, Ohio proves that conservative fiscal policies work in spite of Barack Obama. While Obama’s “leadership” destroyed America’s pristine AAA credit rating, S&P was simultaneously upgrading Ohio’s rating.
[…]Kasich has a damn good record when it comes to fiscal policies. Bill Clinton won’t ever admit it in public, but the real architect of the much-ballyhooed ‘Clinton Surplus’ was none other than John Kasich, the Paul Ryan of Newt Gingrich’s House of Representatives.
John Kasich is one of three governors that I am watching closely. The other two really good ones are Scott Walker in Wisconsin and Bobby Jindal in Louisiana. I personally think that Kasich is the best governor in the United States of America. And Ohio has a great Senate candidate too, named Josh Mandel.
WINTERY KNIGHT 
Wow that was fast, I was just about to say that the title was wrong but then I did a refresh and it was changed.
LikeLike
Thanks for noticing. I had a very very traumatic night debating with some angry Christian women on Facebook.
LikeLike
I didn’t follow the debate. But take heart WK, whatever you said, I’m with you!
LikeLike
Basically, a bunch of feminists got angry because they refuse to respect men or allow them to lead. They resented men asking questions to women during courtship about what the women had read, what they believed and what they intended to do if given a husband and children. They seemed to think that women should have no obligations to act anyway or do anything, unless it makes them happy, and they should not be questioned about what they can or cannot do or what they believe. Men’s job is to furnish women with money and to shut up and let women control everything. Women of course had no obligations or duties, and men were mean if they asked women to do anything for anyone. Any dissent against this was characterized as “arrogant” and “controlling”.
It’s like the woman who said that condemning single motherhood by choice because it harms children was “stoning” women.
My advice? Use these rules before marrying:
https://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/courting-rules-how-to-tell-if-a-woman-is-really-a-christian-or-not/
If the woman either knows the answers to these questions, or is willing to learn, it’s OK to court her and marry her.
If she has the slightest objection to being asked the questions, or refuses to learn, move on to someone else.
NOTE: I am still very upset by this, in case that’s not clear. I am not usually this upset.
LikeLike