
The Des Moines Register reports that Michele Bachmann trails Romney by one point in the latest poll from Iowa.
Excerpt:
Two-time candidate Mitt Romney and tea party upstart Michele Bachmann are neck and neck leading the pack, and retired pizza chief Herman Cain is in third place in a new Des Moines Register Iowa Poll of likely participants in the state’s Republican presidential caucuses.
The results are bad news for the earnest Tim Pawlenty, a former Minnesota governor who is in single digits despite a full-throttle campaign.
Romney, a former Massachusetts governor and business executive, claims 23 percent, and Bachmann, a Minnesota congresswoman and evangelical conservative, garners 22 percent. Neither has done heavy lifting in Iowa.
The rest of the Republican field is at least 12 points behind them.
Cain, a retired Georgia business executive, is the top choice for 10 percent of potential caucusgoers.
Former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich, whose entire Iowa campaign team resigned in frustration two weeks ago over its perception that his efforts are half-hearted, is tied in fourth place at 7 percent with the libertarian-leaning Ron Paul, a longtime Texas congressman.
Pawlenty is at 6 percent; Rick Santorum, a former U.S. senator from Pennsylvania, 4 percent; and Jon Huntsman, a former Utah governor and ambassador to China, 2 percent.
“The surprise here is how quickly Michele Bachmann is catching on,” said Jennifer Duffy, a political analyst with the nonpartisan Cook Political Report of Washington, D.C. “To me, she’s the one to watch, not Romney.”
The poll has a 4.9 point margin of error, so it’s not the greatest poll.
Titanium spine
Bachmann was also interviewed by Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday, where Wallace went out of his way to ask her the tough questions that she will be getting more of as a Republican female candidate. Bob Shieffer also interviewed her on CBS’ Face the Nation show on Sunday.
National Review reports:
On the eve of her presidential announcement in Waterloo, Iowa, a confident Michele Bachmann made the case that she was a serious candidate, attacking President Obama’s record and parrying tough questions in interviews with CBS’s Bob Schieffer and Fox News’s Chris Wallace.
“Since the debate, people have paid attention and they recognize that I am very serious about what I want to do,” Bachmann said on Fox.
She didn’t shy away from outlining clear differences between herself and Mitt Romney, who is statistically tied with her for the lead among Iowa voters according to a Des Moines Register poll released yesterday.
“What people know about me is I do what I say and I say what I mean. I am a fighter for the cause … People recognize that I’m very sincere in what I say,” Bachmann told Wallace. She later criticized Romney for his “disappointing” decision to not sign the pro-life pledge by the Susan B. Anthony List.
“Mitt Romney has to say what he is, but I will say, if he is saying now that he is pro-life, this was a tremendous opportunity to demonstrate that by signing … the pledge,” Bachmann said.
On CBS, Bachmann hit Romney on his health-care program, calling individual mandates at both the state and federal level “unconstitutional,” and arguing that reliance on free market forces, rather than efforts by state or federal government, was how health-care costs should be brought down.
Asked by Wallace about New York’s legislature’s decision to legalize gay marriage, Bachmann said she acknowledged the state’s tenth amendment right to do so, but said she would continue to push for a federal marriage amendment that would outlaw same-sex marriage. She said her position was “entirely consistent,” noting that the issue of gay marriage was likely to be dealt with at a federal level in either the courts or the legislature.
In response to Schieffer’s question about whether she believed homosexuality was a choice or not, Bachmann said she was running for president, not “to be anyone’s judge.”
She also defended herself against charges that she was a gaffe-prone politician who had made erroneous statements in the past. Wallace directly asked, “Are you a flake?” a term that Bachmann called “insulting,” noting her extensive career as a tax lawyer and politician. In response to Shieffer’s remarks about her history of “misleading” statements, Bachmann said, “I haven’t mislead people at all.”
“I think the question should be asked of President Obama,” she added, noting that he pushed for nearly $1 trillion dollar stimulus by saying it would prevent unemployment rates from going above 8 percent. “That is what’s serious. Did he mislead the American people? Not only did he mislead the American people, he caused our economy to go down to depths we haven’t seen,” Bachmann pointed out.
Bachmann, who has criticized Obamacare for taking $500 billion away from Medicare, told Wallace that she did not see Paul Ryan’s budget, a budget which Bachmann voted for and which would also cut Medicare, as impacting seniors the same way Obamacare would.
“Let’s be clear: the Ryan budget is really the 55 and under plan. People need to recognize no one under 55 will be touched,” she said, calling Ryan’s plan a “starting point” for a budget discussion.
“My commitment is to make sure government keeps its promises to senior citizens both on Medicare and on Social Security,” Bachmann said of the 55-year-old and older crowd, but noted that those younger would have to face “adjustments.”
She argued that if the nation was going to be serious about its fiscal situation, the debt ceiling could not be raised. Making clear that she was against defaulting, Bachmann said payments on the debt would have to be prioritized if a new, higher ceiling wasn’t authorized and that Congress would have to cut spending elsewhere. Speaking about how the number of federal limos had been increased by 73 percent in the past two years, Bachmann said it showed how Obama wasn’t “serious about cutting spending” now.
If she were president, matters would be different.
“I have a titanium spine to do what needs to be done to turn the economy around,” Bachmann said on Fox.
She will get the same treatment from the misogynists on the left. Can she take it? I think she can.
Learn more about Michele Bachmann
Speeches:
- Michele Bachmann’s Republican Leadership Conference speech
- Michele Bachmann’s June 18th, 2011 speech at the Right Online Conference
Reactions from her recent debate performance:
Profiles of Michele Bachmann:
Here is the latest comprehensive profile of Michele Bachmann from the Weekly Standard. (H/T Muddling Towards Maturity)
If Huckabee can beat Romney in Iowa, I’m confident Bachmann can do the same.
LikeLike
So how does asking a question about a flip-flop in position (she disliked cuts to medicare when Obama did it but approved when a fellow republican proposed it) make someone who hates women? Based on your logic, can we say that she hates blacks because she criticized a black man?
LikeLike
I do want to say that my comment doesn’t mean I wouldn’t vote for her, I’m becoming more convinced she’s the one (I love the double entendre)…I just dislike that you want someone to use kid gloves because she’s a woman – it will make it harder to get a woman elected – you will see them as these fragile creatures and unlikely to succeed as a president (something I suffer from already – I think I would have a hard time voting for a woman but man, she seems to be the most qualified)
LikeLike
No I understand. I think that she is gaffe prone and that she isn’t squeaky clean. I just think that her wildness might be an asset when it comes to cutting spending. The problem with teh other candidates other than Cain is that they are not wild enough to be the conservative equivalent of Obama. If he adds 800 billion in stimulus, then we need someoen to reverse that and then add 800 billion in spending cuts. I just don’t believe that any of them has the guts to do it except for Michele, and maybe Cain or Pawlenty. In that sense, being a bit wild and passionate helps. She wants to abolish entire departments of the government. I think that’s a good sign that whatever compromises she would make with the big spenders would be just right. She would ask for 4 trillion in cuts and settle for 2 trillion.
LikeLike