Economics Money Finances

Democrat donors gave $442.7 million to elect Kamala Harris, and she lost

One of my favorite things about Trump beating Kamala is how much more money the left spent trying to help her win. Democrats FAR outspent Republicans in their campaigns. And once a dollar is spent on this election, it isn’t there to be spent on the next one. I was very skeptical about Trump’s ability to win this election. He was not my choice. But not only did he win, but he really hurt the secular left.

Here’s the story from Daily Caller:

Outside groups spent $442.7 million on independent expenditures designed either to support Vice President Kamala Harris or to oppose Trump between Oct. 5 and Nov. 5, Federal Election Commission (FEC) records show. On the other side of the equation, PACs only spent about $160.7 million supporting Trump and opposing Harris over the same period. Despite the massive financial advantage, Harris lost the Electoral College and is on track to lose the popular vote as well, according to the New York Times’ projections.

I thought this part below was interesting, because of another story I read recently about how a company that collects donations for Democrat campaigns was not verifying whether the donors were legally allowed to make those donations at all.

Harris’ allies largely relied on dark money — where the original donor is unknown — to fund their home-stretch spending spree, according to FEC records. Future Forward PAC, the primary super PAC that supported Harris, was responsible for about 70% of the pro-Harris and anti-Trump spending during the final month of the election.

Trump’s allies were considerably less reliant on dark money. Make America Great Again Inc., the primary super PAC behind the president-elect, took in about $286.2 million this election cycle, campaign finance records show. Of that sum, about $260 million came from named individuals.

Harris’ official campaign also had far more money than Trump’s, raking in nearly $1 billion in funds while the president-elect took in just $388 million, Forbes reported.

So, here is the article from The Center Square, which reported the latest on Democrat donation collection.

It says:

A nearly year-long investigation into ActBlue, a Democratic Party online donation platform, alleges a large number of suspicious donations have been made, resulting in Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton petitioning the Federal Election Commission to get involved.

[…]Since launching the investigation, Paxton said it’s been publicly reported that potentially fraudulent transactions have occurred on political committee online platforms.

“Certain platforms appear to facilitate straw donor transactions, where a contributor disguises his identity by attributing his contribution to another, unaware person,” the petition states.

Alleged straw donations are being made through the use of prepaid credit cards, which he says “are a favorite tool of fraudsters.”

Paxton’s office launched an investigation into ActBlue in December to determine if the platform’s operations were compliant with all applicable laws.

[…]The OAG’s investigation says it found a large number of suspicious donations that were made “through obscured identities and untraceable means,” necessitating FEC action.

Through the use of prepaid cards it “appears that straw donations are systematically being made using false identities, through untraceable payment methods,” Paxton said.

We are talking about a lot of money here:

ActBlue says it’s raised more than $15.8 billion online since 2004.

In the third quarter of fiscal 2024, it says “6.9 million unique donors gave over 31 million contributions to 18,396 campaigns and organizations, totaling over $1.5 billion.”

Could these donations be coming from donors who are not legally allowed to make these donations?

I know that China, for example, has a lot to lose if Trump imposes tariffs on their exports. So, if it were possible for them to get away with it, why wouldn’t China collude with Democrats in order to interfere with the election? I would not expect the corrupt Biden-Harris regime to do anything to stop them. They’re too busy faking Trump-Russia  collusion stories, conducting surveillance on the Trump campaigns, pre-dawn raiding the homes of Christian pro-lifers, and labeling American parents as “domestic terrorists”.

3 thoughts on “Democrat donors gave $442.7 million to elect Kamala Harris, and she lost”

  1. At least they probably created a few temporary jobs. :-) I didn’t expect Trump to win either. I was just basing my doubts on Allan Lichtman, though. Besides him, all the tea leaves appeared to be pointing toward Trump winning, just not by that much.

    Like

  2. It’s hilarious how many leftists on X are claiming that Trump must’ve cheated because nearly 15,000,000 people who voted for Biden apparently disappeared this election. What do you think is more likely?

    -Trump’s campaign successfully intercepted and destroyed 15,000,000 Harris votes.

        or

        -Biden’s campaign successfully manufactured 15,000,000 votes by exploiting loosely implemented mail-in ballot procedures.

        By the U.S. State Department’s own reports pre-2020, the latter would have been far easier to accomplish. As such, there are no mainstream Democrats calling for an investigation into the 2024 results. I think they’re afraid of what such an investigation might uncover in relation to the 2020 election.

        Liked by 1 person

      Leave a reply to Wintery Knight Cancel reply