On Monday, I blogged about how a federal judge had ruled that a county in Tennessee could not protect children from being exposed to sexually-oriented performances. The same thing just happened in Texas. A federal judge blocked a Texas law that protected children from sexually-oriented performances. But now there is something even worse – banning parents from protecting their own kids.

Here’s the story from The Federalist:

On Aug. 24, the U.S. District Court judge denied a requested injunction from a group of Muslim, Catholic, and Orthodox parents to opt their children out of LGBT storybook lessons.

[…]A stone’s throw from Washington, D.C., Montgomery County Public Schools is one of the largest public school systems in the country, with roughly 70,000 students attending elementary school. Last fall, the Montgomery County Board of Education announced it was adopting a collection of more than 20 “LGBTQ+ inclusive” books for use in pre-K through eighth-grade classrooms.

[…]When parents initially raised objections to the books, the school board said they could opt their children out of instruction involving the books, as parents can for other parts of the curriculum. By the spring, however, the school board announced parents would not only no longer be notified in advance when the books would be read, they also couldn’t opt their children out of instruction involving the books.

Some of the parents who pay the taxes for the salaries of these education bureaucrats didn’t like this, and they sued. They argued that in America, parents have Constitutional freedoms. And they wanted to be allowed to opt their children out of LGBT indoctrination.

But a Biden-appointed judge, who is also paid by the taxpayers, disagreed with the taxpayers:

Biden-appointed Judge Deborah Boardman denied the requested injunction, just days after oral argument. “[T]he plaintiffs have not shown that the no-opt-out policy likely will result in the indoctrination of their children,” she wrote. But what about the parents’ rights to direct the religious upbringing of the children? Boardman’s take is that “[e]ven if their children’s exposure to religiously offensive ideas makes the parents’ efforts less likely to succeed, that does not amount to a government-imposed burden on their religious exercise.”

It’s fine for atheists to tell Christian parents what to do with their kids. And it doesn’t matter when those Christian parents are paying the salaries of those atheists. Parents must pay, and they should be grateful to the atheists who turn their children against God. Parents have no right to direct the religious upbringing of their children. Parents are just there to work, to pay better people to raise their children for them. Atheists are better people. They should be making the decisions about what your children learn. You just pay for it.

Remember, if you don’t like what the taxpayer-funded schools are teaching your children, then you’re a “domestic terrorist”. And since you’re a “domestic terrorist”, then maybe the FBI needs to park 6 SUVs outside your house and break down your door and point loaded assault rifles at your wife and children. The FBI is also paid by taxpayer dollars. You pay them to pre-dawn raid your house.