This is a lecture I found from British historian Dr. Peter J. Williams.
Here’s the main lecture: (54 minutes)
And here’s the Q&A: (9 minutes)
Peter J. Williams is the Warden (CEO) of Tyndale House and a member of the Faculty of Divinity in the University of Cambridge. He received his MA, MPhil and PhD, in the study of ancient languages related to the Bible from Cambridge University. After his PhD, he was on staff in the Faculty of Divinity, Cambridge University (1997–1998), and thereafter taught Hebrew and Old Testament there as Affiliated Lecturer in Hebrew and Aramaic and as Research Fellow in Old Testament at Tyndale House, Cambridge (1998–2003). From 2003 to 2007 he was on the faculty of the University of Aberdeen, Scotland, where he became a Senior Lecturer in New Testament and Deputy Head of the School of Divinity, History and Philosophy. In July 2007 he became the youngest Warden in the history of Tyndale House. He also retains his position as an honorary Senior Lecturer in Biblical Studies at the University of Aberdeen.
Summary of the lecture:
- What if the stories about Jesus are legendary?
- were the gospels transmitted accurately?
- were the gospels written in the same place as where the events happened?
- do the gospel authors know the customs and locations where the events happened?
- do the gospels use the right names for the time and place where the events took place?
- do the gospels disambiguate people’s names depending on how common those names were?
- how do the New Testament gospels compare to the later gnostic gospels?
- how do the gospels refer to the main character? How non-Biblical sources refer to Jesus?
- how does Jesus refer to himself in the gospels? do the later Christians refer to him that way?
- how does Jesus teach? do later Christians teach the same way?
- why didn’t Jesus say anything about early conflicts in the church (the Gentiles, church services)?
- did the writers of the gospels know the places where the events took place?
- how many places are named in the gospels? how about in the later gnostic gospels?
- are the botanical details mentioned in the gospels accurate? how about the later gnostic gospels?
And here are the questions from the audience:
- how what about the discrepancies in the resurrection narratives that Bart Ehrman is obsessed with?
- what do you think of the new 2011 NIV translation (Peter is on the ESV translation committee)?
- how did untrained, ordinary men produce complex, sophisticated documents like the gospels?
- is oral tradition a strong enough bridge between the events and the writers who interviewed the eyewitnesses?
- what does the name John mean?
- why did the gospel writers wait so long before writing their gospels?
- do you think that Matthew and Luke used a hypothetical source which historians call “Q”?
- which gospel do critical historians trust the least and why?
I really enjoyed watching this lecture. He’s getting some of this material from Richard Bauckham’s awesome book “Jesus and the Eyewitnesses”, so if you aren’t familiar with it, you can get an idea of what’s in it. Peter Williams is a lot of fun to listen to – an excellent speaker.
And you can listen to the Peter Williams vs Bart Ehrman debate. That link contains a link to the audio of the debate as well as my snarky summary. It’s very snarky.
One thought on “Peter Williams lectures on the historical reliability of the gospels”