Environmentalists burning helicopter fuel to de-ice wind turbines one at a time

Is there any downside to pursuing green energy?

I have a friend in my office who is very keen on wind and solar. He treats it like a technological problem, and he’s so excited about what discoveries scientists could make to get us off of non-renewable energy sources. In this post, I wanted to look at how the green energy project is working in different places, and then conclude by explaining why Christians should care about this issue.

So, close to home, the state of California heavily committed to developing “green” energy. How is that working out for them?

Here is a recent article from Reuters, a far-left news wire:

California, struggling to balance its clean energy push with the need to boost tight power supplies and avoid rolling blackouts, will lean more on fossil fuels in coming weeks to keep the power on if scorching heatwaves stretch its grid.

The Golden State, which has among the world’s most aggressive environmental policies, faces a potential supply shortfall of up to 3,500 megawatts during peak demand hours in the coming weeks. That is about 2.6 million households worth of electricity supply.

Governor Gavin Newsom plans to fill that gap in part by allowing industrial energy users to run on diesel generators and engines, according to a recent emergency proclamation.

California spent a lot of money on their green energy sources, and they are having to fall back on non-green sources because their plan didn’t work. This isn’t even to mention how much damage their expensive policies have caused to vulnerable bird and bat populations, as well as their constant forest fires. And their electricity prices are extremely high, which disproportionately affects the poor in their state.

Going up north, we find out how green energy is working in socialist Canada.

The Fraser Institute, a non-partisan think tank, reports:

In 2005, Ontario’s provincial government started a process to phase-out its coal-fired plants, one of the province’s least expensive and most flexible sources of generating electricity. Ontario shuttered its last coal plant in 2014 and made it illegal to build any more. In addition, the province launched its Green Energy Act in 2009, which mandated expanded production of renewable energy and encouraged energy conservation.

The result? Ontario now has the fastest-growing electricity costs in Canada and among the highest rates in North America. Furthermore, subsequent research showed that the shutdown of coal plants raised electricity rates in the province but provided few environmental benefits. Indeed, one analysis found that, had the province simply continued with retrofitting coal plants, it could have achieved similar environmental benefits at one-tenth the cost of the green energy programs.

I’ll be saying more about why Christians should care about higher electricity prices, but for now, just note that this isn’t even working in far-left countries, where there is more buy-in from the voters.

The highest electricity rates in the world are currently being paid by residents of Germany. A while back, Germany decided to transition completely off of non-renewable energy. How did that work out for them?

The far left Bloomberg News reports:

One of Germany’s biggest challenges in the fight against climate change is to keep the lights on.

As Europe’s biggest economy shuts its last nuclear reactor next year and utility RWE AG warns that coal plants may close earlier than planned, critics say green energy isn’t being added quickly enough. Germany’s ability to meet peak demand is poised to shrink rapidly over the next two years, increasing the risk of blackouts.

[…][German Chancellor Angela] Merkel admits her government got it wrong. Power demand will probably increase more than official forecasts by the end of the decade, she said in June. A month earlier she recognized that increasing local opposition and too much bureaucracy have curbed investments in green power.

So, why should Christians care about this? Well, consider the problem of educating children that Christian parents face. Christian parents are not only facing problems with mask restrictions, but also teachers who can’t teach marketable skills, and far-left indoctrination. The most reasonable option is to pull the kids out of school and go with a private school, or homeschooling. But that costs money. In fact, money is useful for all sorts of goals that Christians might have – from buying books, to giving to charity, to being able to walk away from a job that violates their consciences, etc. Money is important for Christians. And when it gets eaten up by higher electricity costs, we have fewer options to run our lives the way we want.

9 thoughts on “Is there any downside to pursuing green energy?”

  1. Most green energy rapes the earth. Years ago one of my left-leaning relatives was bragging on his Prius. My son and I asked him to show us the battery. We looked at it and said “Nice! That battery rapes the earth using slave labor.” You should have seen the look on my relative’s face!

    Liked by 3 people

  2. Green is great, for homemade energy where the hours needed to check and maintain aren’t counted in the cost. Most farms and ranches had electric before towns did. But, anyone, father, mother, older children, could keep it going.

    Geothermal looks to be the best bet for commercial green. It’s usually inexpensive in the long run, using natural heat from near volcanic vents and so on. Iceland and Hawaii are laughing at the rest of us for not using it. It’s a gift from the Lord.

    Like

  3. None of your sources mentioned the costs associated with disposing of the 65 meter long carbon fiber blades on the wind turbines that have to be replaced every 5 to 7 years, disposal of the selenium loaded depleted solar panels (expected life is 25 to 30 years), the disposition and recycling of the required storage batteries after 1,000 to 1,500 charge/discharge cycles (about 3 years for a Tesla). Then there is the rare earth elements which are not renewable and come from unfriendly countries (China and Afghanistan). The whole initiative, driven by a few ecoterrorist, is poorly thought out and short sighted, IMHO.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s