Senate Democrats block legislation protecting babies from being killed after birth

What does it really mean to be "pro-choice" on abortion?
What does it really mean to be “pro-choice” on abortion?

A lot of conservatives complain that Republicans don’t pass enough pro-life legislation when they hold the House, Senate and White House. The truth is, the House Republicans DID pass some pro-life legislation from 2016-2018. Some of it got signed into law, but most of it died in the Senate, because of the Democrats.

The Washington Times reports on a bill – Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act – that just died in the Senate:

An effort by Senate Republicans to enhance protections for newborns who survive abortions, spurred by New York and Virginia bills making it easier to perform late-term procedures, was blocked Monday by Democrats.

[…]“There are only two sides of the debate on the floor debate tonight: You’re either for babies, or you’re defending infanticide,” said Mr. Sasse in his floor speech. “That is actually what the legislation is that’s before us.”

[…]The Sasse bill would require medical practitioners caring for infants born alive after botched abortions to “exercise the same degree of professional skill and care to protect the newborn as would be offered to any other child born alive at the same gestational age.”

“It also requires that the living child, after appropriate care has been given, be immediately transported and admitted to a hospital,” said the Sasse press release. “Currently federal law does not adequately protect a born child who survives an abortion.”

Unfortunately for the little babies, the bill did not pass:

Republicans said they would keep pressing for the bill, while pro-life groups denounced Democrats for standing in the way of the legislation.

“Senate Democrats had the chance today to prove they are not the party of infanticide, and instead they doubled down on extremism,” said Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfelser.

It’s not unreasonable to request expedited processing for a bill that ought to pass unanimously. After all, who would vote against a born baby?

Here’s what “moderate” Democrat Dianne Feinstein had to say about infanticide:

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, blasted the Sasse bill as “just the latest attack in the decades-long Republican effort to eliminate a woman’s right to control her own body.”

So, you make a bill outlawing infanticide, and 40 Republican senators co-sponsor it. But the bill dies anyway, because Democrats won’t support it.

The abortion debate was never about weeks or months or viability. Talking about when an unborn baby becomes a human being was just a rhetorical smokescreen to dehumanize unborn children, the same way that skin color was used to dehumanize slaves. Democrats always knew that unborn babies were human beings at every moment during pregnancy. They’re strong. The baby is weak. The baby is in their way. Who cares about reason and evidence? Who cares about right and wrong? If something gets in your way, just kill it, and then silence anyone who makes you feel bad about your selfishness.

I would be very careful about electing people who are willing to kill innocent children who get in the way of their pleasure-seeking. If they aren’t willing to control their hedonism to protect innocent children, they certainly aren’t going to put the brakes on for you.

9 thoughts on “Senate Democrats block legislation protecting babies from being killed after birth”

  1. There is an interesting article about Kathy Tran who introduced the abortion bill to the house in VA. That same day, she introduced a bill that would save, now get this, the caterpillar. Wait, what?
    https://www.lifenews.com/2019/01/31/legislator-behind-bill-legalizing-abortions-up-to-birth-filed-bill-to-save-caterpillars-the-same-day/?fbclid=IwAR2uAYpR2AWNI1jupCVpKc4jqTi8mhbh2aMULjRyDhlWirUNR8HlbetoDEc

    So there you have it. An insect has more value than a human being. And we are an enlightened society? Well, I guess many have been “enlightened” by Nazi ideologies.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. They just get more extreme and defiant on their push to get abortion though at all times. Because after winning all the easy rounds with excuses like maybe the mom will die, or she was raped. All that is left is to get measures like making sure the baby dies just because it is unwanted.

    I use more commonly the term abortocaust, to refer to the state of society. Because it is no better and no less dehumanizing then the holocaust and I feel I am lying to call it anything less than a planned attack on an unwanted and defenseless group of people

    Liked by 1 person

  3. It takes a unique brand of insanity to equate being against murdering a helpless newborn with “eliminating a woman’s right to control her own body,” as Feinstein does. The same goes for this Kathy Tran creature, who apparently deems it more important to protect insects than human beings.
    All I can say is, may God have mercy on their souls.
    If they still have one, that is.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s