Republican legislators getting things done for social conservatives in Texas

Texas Governor Greg Abbott
Texas Governor Greg Abbott

Texas is the most economically successful state in the union, but that’s not the only thing special about Texas. Texas governor Greg Abbott is a strong promoter of the free enterprise system. But he is also serious about defending Judeo-Christian values. Right now, he is my pick to be the next Republican nominee for President, even more than my previous favorite, Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin. Abbott’s doing a lot for social conservatives, as well as fiscal conservatives.

This Texas Tribune story shows what achievements he will be able to run on in a Republican primary:

Gov. Greg Abbott has signed into law legislation shielding pastors’ sermons from government subpoena power.

Senate Bill 24 stemmed from the 2014 battle over Houston’s anti-discrimination ordinance, when the city subpoenaed sermons of five pastors who opposed it. The legislation was a priority of Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who joined Abbott on Sunday for a bill-signing ceremony at the churches of one of those pastors.

[…]Authored by state Sen. Joan Huffman, R-Houston, SB 24 says a government cannot “compel the production or disclosure of a written copy or audio or video recording of a sermon delivered by a religious leader during religious worship … or compel the religious leader to testify regarding the sermon.” It went into effect immediately when it was formally signed by Abbott on Friday in Austin.

You’ll remember that this law became necessary when Houston’s gay Democrat mayor decided to subpoena the sermons of Christian pastors to try to intimidate them into not talking about moral issues.

There’s another story from the Daily Signal about another bill that is headed to Governor Abbott’s desk:

The Texas Senate early Monday passed a bill to allow faith-based adoption and foster care providers to operate based on their religious beliefs.

By a final vote of 21-10, state senators agreed with their counterparts in the Texas House of Representatives that society should continue to make room for adoption and foster care services associated with a religious tradition, whether Christian or Muslim.

Only one Democrat joined the Senate’s 20 Republicans in voting for the bill. The remaining 10 voted against it.

In an interview Monday with The Daily Signal, state Rep. James Frank, a Republican who co-wrote the legislation, predicted that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott would sign it.

“I am obviously very excited about it passing the Senate, and I fully expect … that Governor Abbott will sign it and it will be law,” Frank said, “and we’ll have, I hope, more people serving and free to serve children in the state of Texas.”

Not sure why Democrats would vote against a bill like this, but I notice a lot of Democrats are getting busted for underage sex and underage sexting lately. We already knew how Democrats felt about no-fault divorce and adultery: they’re all for it! Any sort of selfishness that adults can engage in is more important than providing kids with a mom and a dad. Democrats oppose prioritizing opposite sex couples, because it might offend gay couples or single parents.

4 thoughts on “Republican legislators getting things done for social conservatives in Texas”

    1. We need more work on improving laws to protect our first families and to discourage outside forces that try to break up our first families. These bills are only bandaids. They will not fix the real problem.

      1. I agree. There is a homeschool coalition in Texas that is working toward these aims. I am just thankful that I no longer live in California where parental rights are rapidly being stripped away. I had a psychology prof in college who said the slippery slope was invalid logic. Common sense, however, indicates the opposite. When laws are passed, the precedent of those laws have long-term, far-reaching consequences.

  1. Unfortunately I do not live in Texas and my state is well … quite contrary to some of these values.

    The [liberal Texas] media outlets are saying that faith-based religious adoption agencies ‘discriminate’ against the LGBTQ (prospective) parents (one might add also (prospective) ‘single parents’).

    I welcome the bill.

    See, on the flip side, the Catholic Charities in my state had once done adoptions. Catholic Charities is one of the largest charities but is not overseen by the Catholic Church i.e., the archbishop of my metropolitan area does not oversee Catholic Charities. However, the state has an “anti-discrimination” statute (or better, to allow same-sex couples to adopt) and thus the lay-dominated board of the Catholic Charities of my metropolitan area voted unanimously (note: lay people, not necessarily sanctified, and certainly not priests/bishops/archbishops) to continue same-sex adoptions.

    So the archbishop announced that the agency would terminate its adoption work rather than continue to place children under the guardianship of same-sex couples.

    (This is also what happens when you put not sanctified Christians into positions of power.)

    Which would be an interesting blog topic, WK — that Christian men, who might feel less than fully worthy but are more mature and more sanctified ought to seek out positions of servant-leadership especially when asked and when led by the Holy Spirit — in order to prevent those who aren’t as sanctified but are more power-hungry — to take these positions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s