What Putin is teaching us about foreign policy: Obama’s weakness provokes aggression

Vladimir Putin and the Clown of the United States
Vladimir Putin and the Community Organizer of the United States

Other than Weekly Standard, my two favorite places to read about foreign policy are the Wall Street Journal and the UK Telegraph. And my favorite writer from all three of these is Bret Stephens, columnist at the Wall Street Journal.

Here is his latest article (click through to WSJ), then we’ll go to the UK Telegraph after.

Stephens writes:

David Petraeus testified last month to the Senate Armed Services Committee on U.S. policy in the Middle East. Regarding Syria, the former general and CIA director urged a credible threat to destroy Bashar Assad’s air force if it continues to bomb its own people. He also recommended “the establishment of enclaves in Syria protected by coalition air power, where a moderate Sunni force could be supported and where additional forces could be trained, internally displaced persons could find refuge, and the Syrian opposition could organize.”

But Barack Obama does not agree. At his Friday press conference, the president described such views as “mumbo-jumbo,” “half-baked ideas,” “as-if” solutions, a willful effort to “downplay the challenges involved in the situation.” He says the critics have no answers to the questions of “what exactly would you do and how would you fund it and how would you sustain it.”

America’s greatest living general might as well have been testifying to his shower drain for all the difference his views are going to make in this administration.

So it is with this president. It’s not enough for him to stake and defend his positions. He wants you to know that he thinks deeper, sees further, knows better, operates from a purer motive. His preferred method for dealing with disagreement is denigration. If Republicans want a tougher line in Syria, they’re warmongers.

Yes. Every time the President gives a speech on policy, you can count on him to present alternatives to his own very left-wing views as incredibly evil, incredibly stupid or both. He thinks that he knows everything, and that talking to people who disagree with him, no matter how qualified they are (e.g. – General Petraeus) would be a waste of time. Everyone who opposes his fact-free, pot-smoking, college dorm discussion view of reality is stupid or evil or both. And this man is President.


For a relatively trivial investment of some jet fighters and a brigade-sized support force, Moscow extends its influence in the eastern Mediterranean, deepens a commercially and strategically productive alliance with Iran, humiliates the U.S., boosts Mr. Putin’s popularity at home, and earns a geopolitical card he can play in any number of negotiations—Ukraine, gas contracts, Mr. Assad’s political future, you name it. If things don’t work out, he can pull up stakes within a week without much loss of money, lives or prestige. It’s a perfect play.

Now let’s go to the UK Telegraph, and Matthew K. Lewis.

He writes:

Russian warplanes began bombing American-backed Syrian opposition strongholds on Wednesday, a move that can be viewed as the latest example of American humiliation abroad.

As was the case when Russians invaded Ukraine, the Russians cloaked their activity in lies.

In the former example, Russian soldiers didn’t wear uniforms, a thinly-veiled move meant to create the impression the fighters were merely Ukrainian “separatists.”

Likewise, Wednesday’s bombings ostensibly targeted Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Isil); in fact, the strikes were aimed at moderate rebels and civilians – part of a plan to take out any opposition to their client, Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad.

[…]This all comes on the heels of President Barack Obama’s drawing of a “red line” regarding the use of chemical weapons, only to back down when the Assad regime – by most accounts – used them.

Weakness invites provocation, and – never one to miss an opportunity to outmanoeuvre Mr Obama – Mr Putin provided a self-serving opportunity that would also allow the president to save face: Moscow would push Syria to put their chemical weapons under international control.

[…]It’s also important to note that in the wake of the red line being trampled, Russia invaded Crimea. President Obama’s legacy may be mixed, but one thing is for sure: Vladimir Putin is much more powerful and provocative than he was before Mr Obama took office, and Russia has only expanded its sphere of influence.

[…]For those paying attention, Mr Obama’s foreign policy world-view has failed.

Russia is our enemy, and they are trying to undermine us everywhere they can. Obama is meeting this challenge with the typical weakness he has shown in negotiations and stand-offs since he went on his Worldwide Bow Down To Dictators tour. His priorities seem to be to cut military spending and impose political correctness on the armed services. His latest great achievement in that regard is to nominate a gay civilian who has never served in the military to be head of the entire U.S. Army. That’s what he is most concerned about, political correctness. Not national security and not foreign policy.

3 thoughts on “What Putin is teaching us about foreign policy: Obama’s weakness provokes aggression”

  1. Why would anyone expect anything different from a community organizer who sat in a “church” that spewed hatred for America for 20 years. He’s not dumb. He’s not out maneuvered. He’s doing exactly what he set out to do when elected. His objective is to “fundamentally transform” this nation, and he is succeeding. That said, he’s not the problem. He is a symptom, not a cause. The sheeple of the USA are the problem. Fifty years ago, BHO would have been clearly recognized as the radical lefty that he is. Not today.


  2. Thanks for the heads-up on those two columnists. Interesting reads.

    But honestly speaking, I’m still not settled on whether or not the Russians are the true enemy. Why? Well, there seem to be conflicting reports coming out of all this, both news directly related to the Syrian conflict and news not related to it. This impression from some news sites is that Russia is just doing the job of exterminating IS, the job that America said it had been doing. On the other hand, others new sources are saying that Russia is attacking the wrong terrorists (i.e. attacking the moderate terrorists [rebels] that the US spent millions on training and arming). The AFP has reported that panic has started to spread among IS and has caused many (currently 600) to flee. Then, however, the fact that Iran is in the mix, the country that our president just handed over $150-billion-dollars’ worth of assets / money to.

    And, as for the unrelated news: How about all the movement towards protecting Russian Orthodox Christianity and its values that Putin has reportedly done? (Like banning gay parades for 100 years, for example.) Compare that with what Obama has done both in America and around the world. I mean, he went to Kenya and tried to lecture them about gay rights even after a large coalition of pastors wrote an open letter telling him to not do it.

    The guy has some nerve. If I didn’t know any better, I’d think he is deliberately weakening America and, as the commenter above points out, “fundamentally transforming” the US. In fact, when he won his first term, the USA Today newspaper had a front page splash reading: “Obama Pledges to Remake America”:

    Boy, did he ever do that!


  3. The entire world is in competition for limited resources and limited ways to generate revenues. In that sense, RU and the US are not on the same side. However, culturally, the US must join with RU to defeat the threat to the West — Islam.

    RU wants to be our friend (witness the inside info on terrorists that the US chose to ignore). Unlike China, it has a more open economy. The US and RU could do much good in the world and still exercise the normal world market competition.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s