New study is up here at the National Institutes of Health web site.
Life News reported on the study here.
Excerpt:
A new study of women from India shows women who get an induced abortion are 626% more likely to have breast cancer compared with women who carry their pregnancies to term and have the baby.The study found women more likely to have breast cancer had “higher number of abortions.”
This study follows closely after a bombshell meta-analysis of breast cancer studies found a 44% increased risk of contracting breast cancer for women who had abortions.
“History of abortion was also found to be positively associated with the risk of breast cancer with 6.26 times higher risk in women having a history of abortion,” they concluded.
The doctors conducting the new study are based at the Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India. Their report, published in the Indian Journal of Cancer confirms what previous studies have shown, namely that an abortion weakens the breast’s muscle tissue in a way that makes it more susceptible to cancer.
“However, the cases had a significantly higher number of abortions (61.3%) as compared to the controls (16.3%),” they wrote. “History of abortion was also found to be positively associated with the risk of breast cancer with 6.26 times higher risk in women having a history of abortion. The history of abortions was found to be significantly higher in breast cancer cases as compared to controls, with the Relative Risk (RR) = 6.26 in women having a history of abortion.”
This is not the first study to confirm a link between abortion and breast cancer.
Abortion and breast cancer
Many studies show a link between abortion and breast cancer.
Study 1: (September 2010)
Based on the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2/neu (HER2), breast cancer is classified into several subtypes: luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-), luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+), HER2-overexpressing (ER-, PR-, and HER2+) and triple-negative (ER-, PR-, and HER2-). The aim of this case-control study is to determine reproductive factors associated with breast cancer subtypes in Chinese women. A total of 1,417 patients diagnosed with breast cancer in the First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China between 2001 and 2009 and 1,587 matched controls without a prior breast cancer were enrolled.
[…]Postmenopause and spontaneous abortion were inversely associated with the risk of luminal tumors. By contrast, multiparity, family history of breast cancer and induced abortion increased the risk of breast cancer.
Study 2: (March 2010)
OBJECTIVE: To explore the risk factors of breast cancer for better control and prevention of the malignancy.
METHODS: The clinical data of 232 patients with pathologically established breast cancer were investigated in this 1:1 case-control study to identify the risk factors of breast cancer.
RESULTS: The history of benign breast diseases, family history of carcinoma andmultiple abortions were the statistically significant risk factors of breast cancer, while breast feeding was the protective factor.
CONCLUSION: A history of benign breast diseases, family history of carcinoma and multiple abortions are all risk factors of breast cancer.
And more recently, I blogged about a very recent study from China which concluded thus:
IA is significantly associated with an increased risk of breast cancer among Chinese females, and the risk of breast cancer increases as the number of IA increases. If IA were to be confirmed as a risk factor for breast cancer, high rates of IA in China may contribute to increasing breast cancer rates.
IA is, of course, induced abortion.
Wow thank you for sharing this study and previous studies showing the correlation between abortion and breast cancer. While it’s not the Christian chief reason to oppose abortion, it definitely add more reason why it’s bad ethically and in terms of an undesirable state of affair.
LikeLike
My dad works at the National Institute of Health!
LikeLike
Their web site is the first place I go to look for papers online. I also like DBLP’s web site.
LikeLike
I never checked the DBLP website, will check it out. Thanks!
LikeLike
Well, I use it for my computer science research, not general science!
LikeLike
I realized that when I went on the site. I was like…this is about computers? Will suggest it to my brother though since he is into computer network security and all that computer stuff.
LikeLike
My dad was telling me that it is more of a researcher center than a hospital. This is interesting and another reason why abortions and artificial contraceptions can be damaging to a woman’s health.
LikeLike
It’s good that they are doing research on this, because there is such a well-funded effort to get women to take contraceptives and use induced abortions as part of feminism that someone has to tell them the facts before they make the wrong decision.
I know Hillary Clinton was doing a lot to promote abortion in various countries as Secretary of State, but this paper only just came out.
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/06/26/hillary-clinton-upset-un-document-didnt-promote-abortion/
LikeLike
Hillary Clinton exasperates me. A lot of feminists don’t like the fact that some states make it harder for women to get abortions or make it mandatory that a woman has to be educated and get an ultrasound before an abortion is performed. Feminism likes woman to remain ignorant; it is easier to control them that way.
LikeLike
Catholic for Choice? That has got to be an oxymoron.
LikeLike