Toronto man who is suspected in mall shooting was under “house arrest”

How ineffective is the justice system in Canada? Well the Conservatives are trying to lock it down, but things like “house arrest” are very popular with liberal elites.

Here’s what you can do in Canada while under “house arrest” for some other crime:

A 23-year-old man was supposed to be under house arrest when police say he opened fire this weekend inside a busy Toronto shopping mall, killing one and leading to injuries to seven others.

The suspect, Christopher Husbands, is now in custody after surrendering early Monday, police said.

[…]He faces one count of first-degree murder and six counts of attempted murder, according to police. Husbands appeared around 3:30 p.m. in a Toronto courtroom, where he was formally charged, CNN affiliate CTV reported.

[…]The detective described Husbands as a “charged individual (who) was on house arrest conditions, not to be outside his residence” when he was out with people — including Ahmed Hassan, the 24-year-old man police say he shot dead — on Saturday at the Eaton Centre mall in downtown Toronto.

In Canada, as in the UK (and here), criminals are apparently less at risk of being put in jail than law-abiding people who defend themselves.

Excerpt:

Chen owns the Lucky Moose Food Mart in Toronto. When a career thief ripped him off yet again in May 2009, he had had enough. Chen chased down the thug, tied him up with twine and stuffed him into the back of a van, then called police.

When police arrived, however, Chen was the one charged with numerous crimes including kidnapping, forcible confinement and having a concealed weapon. The last count was added because Chen keeps a box cutter in his back pocket for work. 

[…]The senate committee also heard from Joseph and Marilyn Singleton of Taber, Alberta.

When the couple returned home to their rural acreage after a dinner in May 2010, they found a suspected thief trying to flee after he and two others had allegedly broken into their house, trashed their home and stolen their belongings.

When the suspect tried to smash through their garage door with his getaway car, Joseph feared for his wife, who was standing on the other side of it, calling police. Joseph hit the 20-year-old in the head with the butt end of an axe to subdue him. The homeowner was charged with assault with a weapon and assault causing bodily harm, offences that carry up to 10 years in prison. The charges were later dropped.

The repeat offender, who was on bail after threatening another homeowner with a crowbar, was given house arrest.

“One of the hardest things I have ever had to do is answer questions from my young grandchildren, trying to explain why their grandfather was in trouble for protecting their grandmother,” Joseph told the committee.

Marilyn echoed his feelings. “At the time of our home invasion, I never would have dreamed that Joe would be charged for possibly saving my life. If he did not take action, it’s possible he would have had to explain to our children and grandchildren why he did not take action to protect their mother and grandmother.”

Defending themselves against the charges cost the couple $30,000, draining their retirement savings.

I guess that the jails in Canada are meant primarily for law-abiding people or legal gun owners. Criminals apparently go free, aka “house arrest”. That’s liberal jurisprudence – all very tolerant, you know. Let’s hope the Conservatives can fix the mess the Liberal Party made.

4 thoughts on “Toronto man who is suspected in mall shooting was under “house arrest””

  1. There *is* change in the wind here in Canada, though it’s being fought tooth and nail by the lefties. We desperately need new prisons, not only because of our growing population, (which will always mean more people in prison, just because the percentage doesn’t change all that much) but also because many of our facilities are ancient and decrepit. But the Harper Haters are against it, claiming that our PM (yes, he personally) wants more prisons so he can jail more people for petty crimes. (In between dining on kittens and personally dumping toxic waste into the environment, I suppose.) Oh, and privatize the system and make it more “American style.” That’s a big one. If the lefties don’t like something, they’ll call it “American style.” o_O

    They’re an odd bunch. I used to think the term “liberalism is a mental disorder” was hyperbole. Then I started actually reading some of the bizarre mental gymnastics so many of them use, and now I’m not so sure!

    Like

  2. I may be offbase on this, but isn’t this exact kind of thing (law abiding folks being charged, that is) was what was behind the stand your ground types of laws, or the laws on the books in certain states that protect a homeowner from any charges in the event of a home invasion/robbery?

    Like

  3. Of course minorities and immigrants are going to get off lightly, under our injustice system here in Canada. However, you can be sure a white male who commits any crimes will have the book thrown at him. (Full disclosure: I’m a mixed race man, half-white, and half-not.) Leftists don’t believe in absolute justice, when it comes to crime; it’s all ‘contextual’ to them, and ‘disadvantaged minorities’ and women are to have a slap on the wrist, while the full strength of the law is brought to bear on white men.

    Like

Leave a comment