Justin Brierley’s latest Unbelievable show features William Lane Craig discussing the 3-on-3 debate with Richard Dawkins that occured in Mexico.
Details:
William Lane Craig is a philosopher, author and key defender of the Christian faith in debates around the world.
Although atheist Richard Dawkins had publicly said he will not debate Craig, he found himself on the same platform as him in November 2010. Dawkins was on an atheist team, Craig on a theist team as they debated “Does the Universe have a purpose?” at a Mexico TED-style event.
With extracts from the debate, William (Bill) Lane Craig chats to Justin about the circumstances of their encounter and why he believes Dawkins and the atheist team changed their tactics mid way, were ununified and failed to address the arguments that were presented.
To watch the full debate http://www.premiercommunity.org.uk/group/unbelievable/forum/topics/richard-dawkins-just-broke-his
Summary:
- who organized the conference?
- why was Craig invited to the event?
- how did Dawkins get involved?
- what happened when Craig and Dawkins met in the lobby?
- what did Craig think of format of the debate?
- clips of Richard Dawkins and William Lane Craig
- how the no-purpose side changed strategies in the debate
- what did Dawkins lecture on the day before the debate?
- how should Christians respond to the popularity of Dawkins?
- how did Dawkins respond to Bill Craig’s arguments?
- what does Dawkins think about the “Why” questions of life?
- how did Dawkins respond to the kalam and fine-tuning arguments?
- is there anything wrong with Dawkins’ epistemology?
- what arguments were presented by each side?
- which side’s case is rooted in emotion and wishing?
Here’s a clip showing some of the more memorable parts:
It turns out that Michael Shermer spoke up to the conference organizers to get Craig invited to the event. I have always had a good opinion of Shermer personally, and this just cements it. Shermer is an uncommonly fair atheist. He has no problem hearing from the other side. You can read a transcript of his debate with Greg Koukl, moderated by national radio show hose Hugh Hewitt.
I would like to see Richard Dawkins debate William Lane Craig one-on-one. I think it is interesting that Dawkins avoids debating Craig even though Hitchens has debated Craig and Sam Harris WILL BE debating Craig shortly. Why do so many atheists believe in Dawkins when he will not debate.
WINTERY KNIGHT 
Please give details on the Craig/Harris debate when you get them. Thanks
LikeLike
This is all I have so far:
http://manawatu.christian-apologetics.org/debates-2011-william-lane-craig-sam-harris-lawrence-krauss/
LikeLike
Very good. It’s certainly in character that Richard Dawkins would present a strawman case without regard to Craig’s opening statement. He’s never professed to care about what theists have to say, so I’m sure he tuned out when Craig was speaking. That’s a pretty big blunder in my opinion, but from Dawkins perspective he probably feels justified in ignoring Craig.
LikeLike
This mp3 really proved my suspicions about Dawkins’ attitude toward answering the big questions in life, or as he would put it: the silly questions in life.
I haven’t watched the debate yet. How did Michael Shermer argue in the debate? Did he try and find common ground with the theists? Or did he act arrogant?
LikeLike
I’m involved in an active discussion of this video on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRmKA5zUYBI
Feel free to join the party.
LikeLike