Excerpt:
An aborted baby boy, who had been declared dead by doctors in Foshan City, China, suddenly cried out as he was about to be cremated, but died later after doctors refused to treat him.
A mortuary worker at the Nanhai Funeral Home reportedly was startled by a cry from a box, labeled “medical waste,” that he was about to put into the incinerator. He opened the carton and found the baby moving, but choking on some cotton wool in his mouth, the locally based Information Times reported.
After the worker cleared his mouth, the baby yawned and breathed normally. He was rushed back to Guanyao Hospital, which had attempted to abort him earlier that day; but doctors in the hospital reportedly ignored him and left him in the lobby to die.
[…]Following this, the report said that all workers at the funeral home had been ordered not to talk about the incident.
How did we come to the point where people could think that their pursuit of happiness meant that they were morally justified in turning away from a helpless child who needed love? All morality is personal – people need to stop worrying about nonsense like global warming and overpopulation and just take responsibility for one person who needs love. The world would be a much better place.
I find it ironic that many of the strongest proponents of abortion who approve of scenarios like the above are so concerned about recycling, animal rights and terrorist rights. They don’t like waterboarding terrorists like Khalid Sheik Mohammed in order to prevent terrorist attacks on Los Angeles, but abandoning seven-month old babies is no problem. And they think that they are morally superior to pro-lifers.
WINTERY KNIGHT 
There’s a quote which I half remember which says that the degree to which a society may be considered civilized is measurable by the degree to which it looks after the most vulnerable members of that society. And that this atrocity is committed by those whose job is to save lives adds to the horror. To my mind, the abortion doctor is on a par with nazis at places like Auschwitz or Belsen. One day, society will see it that way. May that day come sooner rather than later.
LikeLike
American doctors have done the same. In abortion, the intent is not merely to end the pregnancy, it is to kill the unborn child. Whether this is done inside or outside the womb surely matters little to those engaged in the act.
LikeLike
I’m not sure what is the larger tragedy, this boy’s death at the hands of doctors, or the many people who call on the name of Jesus who see it as an acceptable sacrifice in the name of Social Justice… and oh yea, recycling.
LikeLike
“How did we come to the point where people could think that their pursuit of happiness meant that they were morally justified in turning away from a helpless child who needed love?”
What would make you think it was “their pursuit of happiness”? The Chinese government officially bans more than one child to a family. It’s population control. Since the official government line is atheism, it is inconceivable that your pitiful religious mythology that suggests that humans are valuable has no bearing here. The baby was in the way. He had to go. End of story.
LikeLike
This brings to mind Gianna Jessen, Ximena Renaerts et aliae.
LikeLike
Interesting post and interesting timing when I just read this in the UK – http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/7764994/More-than-1000-under-15s-had-an-abortion-last-year.html.
It is crazy how people can ignore the fact that foetuses are living breathing things. The whole concept that this foetus magically becomes a human after it leaves the womb needs to change.
Good post.
LikeLike