All posts by Wintery Knight

https://winteryknight.com/

Dr. James Tour discusses the case for design in nature with Tucker Carlson

Every time an intelligent design scholar appears on a popular show, I like to write something about it. We’ve been blessed lately to hear the case for design presented on Joe Rogan and Piers Morgan and Ben Shapiro. So, people are starting to learn about the origin of life, the fossil record, the structures inside the cell, and other pieces of evidence that are terrible for naturalism. And now another big show (Tucker Carlson) has had Dr. James Tour on.

Here’s the video: (1 hour and 40 minutes)

Topics:

  • Tour’s professional background: Professor at Rice University teaching organic chemistry and nanotechnology, with appointments in chemistry, materials science, nanoengineering, and computer science; conducts research, mentors PhD students, publishes papers, and has founded companies in pharmaceuticals, materials, electronics, including AI computing and memory chips.
  • Active involvement in scientific research beyond teaching, spending most time on research rather than lecturing.
  • No internal conflict between science and Christian faith; scientific understanding enhances belief in God.
  • Molecular basis for wood’s properties: polysaccharides strands held by hydrogen bonds providing impact strength, explaining why a tree withstands a car crash better than the car.
  • Comparison of wood’s durability (1,000-year-old structures) vs. plastics decomposing in 5-10 years, highlighting divine material design.
  • Challenges in building robots from biological molecules (polysaccharides, polypeptides, lipids, nucleic acids) vs. using plastics, wires, silicon; humans mimic nature but can’t replicate molecular construction.
  • Photosynthesis in leaves: magnesium atom in porphyrin funnels light, ejects electron, processes CO2 into tree structure and releases O2.
  • Vision mechanism: rhodopsin molecules change configuration upon photon impact, relax back to enable sight.
  • Memory formation: electronic interactions lead to protein synthesis, which during sleep forms hardwired brain interconnects.
  • Scientists sometimes worship creation (e.g., trees) instead of the creator, per G.K. Chesterton quote.
  • Private admissions by scientists: no full understanding of life, origins, or mechanisms; some privately agree with Tour but stay silent.
  • Community pressures: exclusion from societies and academies for admitting uncertainties or diverging from norms.
  • Science requires honesty and admitting unknowns, but COVID revealed dishonesty, eroding credibility.
  • Peer review biases: papers challenging established views often rejected, especially if contradicting reviewer’s career work.
  • Grant funding tied to aligning with certain narratives; hard to introduce field-shaking ideas.
  • Evolutionary process lacks detailed chemical explanation; molecular interactions for changes not clarified.
  • Two-day meeting in St. Louis with colleague to discuss evolutionary chemistry, but left unconvinced.
  • Characteristics of life: responsive to environment, growth/change, metabolism, homeostasis, cellular composition, trait inheritance.
  • Efforts to redefine life minimally to claim synthetic creation, but such claims lack full characteristics like homeostasis (e.g., maintaining internal temperature, pH, ATP production).
  • Origin-of-life researchers use “proto-life” to hype lab results; media exaggerates to “scientists created life.”
  • Challenges to researchers: inability to link two amino acids or glucose molecules prebiotically without interference.
  • Unfulfilled predictions: e.g., Jack Szostak (2014: life in 3-5 years), Dmitry Tarseslav (5 years), Steve Benner (paradoxes solved), Lee Cronin (2011: life in couple years)—none achieved.
  • Creating life: turning inorganic to living meeting life criteria.
  • Four compound classes for life: lipids (cell membranes), polysaccharides (energy/channels), nucleotides (RNA/DNA), polypeptides (proteins/enzymes).
  • Inability to form these polymers or even monomers prebiotically.
  • Miller-Urey experiment (1953): produced amino acids but unusable mixtures without handedness.
  • Molecular chirality: right- and left-handed forms (mirror images like hands); biology needs one handedness, prebiotic methods yield mixtures.
  • Modern techniques achieve chirality but not via early Earth mimicry; chiral surfaces fail to produce pure handedness.
  • Inability to assemble cell even with all components, ions, and DNA code provided.
  • Simplest cells: similar in modern and fossil records; biophysical calculations show minimal operable cell needs 15 unmade prebiotic components.
  • Progress illusion: new discoveries (e.g., chiral induced spin selectivity, interactome) move target farther away.
  • No scientific idea how life originated; Bible says God spoke it into existence, science seeks details.
  • Projections of nearing life creation due to mob mentality, career inertia.
  • Cop-out responses: e.g., Benner leaving assembly to younger researchers.
  • Cloning: duplicates existing life, not creates; starts with cells, inserts genetics.
  • Ethical concerns: cloning humans could create superhuman races or enhanced individuals (e.g., 10% faster, 20% smarter).
  • Genetic engineering: potential to correct disorders (e.g., autism, breast cancer predisposition) vs. abuse like preemptive surgeries.
  • Chinese embryo modification abuse: led to imprisonment, career ends, funding bans; community condemned.
  • Evolution: from LUCA (last universal common ancestor) to diversity via adaptation to environment.
  • Microevolution: observed small changes (e.g., bird bills, bacterial antibiotic resistance via mutations or population selection).
  • Bacterial resistance: often surviving resistant individuals propagate; finish antibiotics to eliminate all.
  • Bacteria share DNA via tubules; respond to stresses, suggesting cellular “consciousness” or adaptive behavior.
  • Macroevolution: body plan changes (e.g., invertebrate to vertebrate) never observed.
  • Fossil record: supports microevolution but not body plan transitions; hypotheses link fossils without direct evidence.
  • Regulatory genetic networks: early wiring lethal if clipped; requires coordinated downstream changes (not single mutations).
  • Lenski experiment (1988-present): bacterial evolution under stress equivalent to 2 million years; no body plan changes, only minor (e.g., citrate use via existing gene activation).
  • Cambrian explosion (540M years ago): sudden burst of species over short period, no transitional forms.
  • Punctuated equilibrium (Gould): stasis then sudden changes, no gradual ramp from single cell.
  • No animal macroevolution to new species; some plant genome doubling.
  • Unicellular to multicellular: not observed, requires regulatory network changes.
  • Design language implies designer; some admit “looks designed” but deny it.
  • Resistance to questioning evolution: funding cuts, grant denials, academy exclusion for Tour’s skeptical statement.
  • Unsolved: sleep consolidates memory via protein strengthening, hardwired interconnects.
  • Cell anatomy: extraordinary, can’t mimic.
  • Mimicking materials (e.g., wood as nylon-carbon composite) but not structures.
  • Phenomena: sensing stares (evolutionary prey detection?), maternal intuition.
  • Dark matter/energy: 70-90% of universe, inferred by difference from Big Bang matter/energy.
  • Electromagnetic spectrum: narrow visible range; tools detect beyond (e.g., radio waves).
  • Fine-tuning: physical constants (e.g., water dipole moment) precise for life; slight changes preclude life.
  • Unique Earth: atmosphere, breathable, viewable heavens; universal periodic table.
  • Cell as factory with systems engineering.
  • Synthetic molecular brain: voltage pulses for simple gates (AND/OR), vs. child’s complex brain.
  • Mosquitoes: coordinated flight via pheromone sensors from tiny brains.

Nice to see Dr. Tour bringing up additional evidence that is not related to his usual domain: the origin of life. Specifically, he brought up the fine-tuning, habitability, and sudden infusions of information in the fossil record, e.g. – the Cambrian explosion. I want everyone to know about these things.

I’m not keeping track of the controversies with Tucker Carlson, etc. I’m only posting this because I want you to share it, and pray for the people who watched it who are still not yet reconciled with God, through Christ.

Knight and Rose Show #70: E. Calvin Beisner: Climate and Energy

Welcome to episode 70 of the Knight and Rose podcast! In this episode, Wintery Knight and Desert Rose discuss the climate and energy policy with Dr. E. Calvin Beisner of the Cornwall Alliance. If you like this episode, please subscribe to the podcast, and subscribe to our YouTube channel. We would appreciate it if you left us a 5-star review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

Podcast description:

Christian apologists Wintery Knight and Desert Rose discuss apologetics, policy, culture, relationships, and more. Each episode equips you with evidence you can use to boldly engage anyone, anywhere. We train our listeners to become Christian secret agents. Action and adventure guaranteed. 30-45 minutes per episode. New episode every week.

Episode summary:

Wintery Knight and Desert Rose welcome Dr. E. Calvin Beisner to discuss climate and energy policy. They explore Biblical dominion and stewardship, contrasting the Christian worldview with the pantheistic roots of environmental movements. Beisner explains Earth’s natural resilience through Le Chatelier’s principle and the Genesis perspective. He critiques climate alarmism, highlighting warming benefits like longer growing seasons. Beisner compares energy sources, advocating for abundant energy to aid human flourishing.

Outline and transcript

Here is a transcript of the show provided by TurboScribe AI. TurboScribe AI allows you to translate the transcript into many, many different languages. You can also export the transcript into many different formats, with optional timestamps.

Episode 70:

Speaker biographies

Dr. E. Calvin Beisner is the founder and national spokesman of the Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation, Dr. Beisner established The Cornwall Alliance in 2005, building on years of research and teaching in theology, economics, environmental ethics, and public policy. With a background in historical theology and social ethics, he has lectured worldwide, testified before government bodies, and authored numerous books and articles on environmental stewardship and economic development. His early experiences in Calcutta, India, witnessing both the beauty of creation and the tragedy of poverty, deeply shaped his vision for Cornwall Alliance. He is the author of Climate and Energy: The Case for Realism.

Wintery Knight is a black legal immigrant. He is a senior software engineer by day, and an amateur Christian apologist by night. He has been blogging at winteryknight.com since January of 2009, covering news, policy and Christian worldview issues.

Desert Rose did her undergraduate degree in public policy, and then worked for a conservative Washington lobbyist organization. She also has a graduate degree from a prestigious evangelical seminary. She is active in Christian apologetics as a speaker, author, and teacher.

Podcast RSS feed:

https://feed.podbean.com/knightandrose/feed.xml

You can use this to subscribe to the podcast from your phone or tablet. I use the open-source AntennaPod app on my Android phone.

Podcast channel pages:

Video channel pages:

Music attribution:

Strength Of The Titans by Kevin MacLeod
Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/5744-strength-of-the-titans
License: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

How Dr. Walter Bradley helped me keep my faith at university and in the workplace

My close friends know that Walter Bradley is the Christian scholar I admire the most. I’ve mentioned Dr. Bradley on the Knight and Rose Show several times, and plugged the book about his life “For a Greater Purpose: The Life and Legacy of Walter Bradley“. Dr. Bradley passed away recently, and so people have been paying their respects.

My good friend Kevin, who is an amazing Christian man and a real hero to me, mentioned an article about Dr. Bradley by Dr. William Dembski. Kevin asked me to write something of my own. Work has just been draining all my fuel lately, so this is the best I can do. I am not a perfectionist, and I try to write these posts in under 1-2 hours each day, so there is a lot more to say than what you will find here.

I first encountered Dr. Bradley shortly after I arrived in America by  ordering some of his campus lectures from Veritas Forum. These lectures had a huge impact on me, even causing me to have a plan to do a PhD in computer science and go into teaching. I figured out by listening to all of Dr. Bradley’s lectures that this is what he was always urging Christian graduate students to do. Well, my plans got derailed because it took me 16 years to get a permanent residency, and another 5 years to get my citizenship. Even if I got the PhD then, I would have much less time for research and teaching.

Still, I thought it might be fun to list out the lectures that I ordered from Veritas Forum that featured Walter Bradley:

  • Dr. Walter Bradley – Giants In The Land – Georgia – 1997
  • Dr. Walter Bradley – Scientific Evidence for an Intelligent Designer – Georgia – 1997
  • Dr. Walter Bradley – Scientific Evidence for an Intelligent Designer – Penn State – 1997
  • Dr. Walter Bradley – A Scientist’s Quest For Success – Penn State – 1997
  • Dr. Walter Bradley – Truth In Religion – Georgia – 1997
  • Dr. Walter Bradley – Truth In Religion – Penn State – 1997

If you want to listen to some of these lectures, I uploaded them as MP3s here, from the original audio cassettes, which are unavailable now, and not online anywhere. The key ones are the “Testimony”, and the 3 versions of “Giants in the Land”. The sound quality is not the best, and there is a pause in the recording from when I flipped the cassettes. If you listen to those, and read “Cyrano de Bergerac” in the original French, then you’ll know a lot about me.

The Walter Bradley lectures I remember the most were Testimony and different versions of Giants in the Land. He talked about how he grew up. His Dad committed suicide when he was young, and he was always poor. He worked a lot of jobs to make ends meet, and was excellent in his academic studies and sports. He wanted so badly to be a success, but found achieving success very empty and unfulfilling. What was fulfilling for him was his relationship with God, and serving God. It’s lessons like this that allowed me to persist all this time, even without the traditional home and church community that most Christians have. I was trained by these two lectures to operate alone in a harsh environment, like a secular university or workplace.

One part that stood out to me was his explanation of how he stopped viewing Christianity as a set of rules, instead of as a relationship. He explained this by telling how his affection for his girlfriend and eventual wife Ann caused him to finally understand that Christianity was not about stopping the things that you most liked doing, and starting the things that you least liked doing. Even though he didn’t have a lot of money for dating, he liked to take Ann on dates, because he loved her. And that’s how Christians ought to feel about the how the Boss wants them to act. Prioritizing Boss in your conduct and life-planning is easy when you are in a relationship with a Boss who leads from the front. For me, a valuable lesson was that you don’t have to care about your reputation if you are excellent in things like education, career, marriage and finances.

He also talked a lot about how to be a Christian in academia, and the importance of professors being a resource for their students. He was very familiar with the law, and threatened to sue whenever he had to “butt heads” with the Dean. But he also had a lot of amazing adventures by being willing to be identified as a Christian. He explains in “Giants in the Land” how he would feel about identifying as a Christian to his secular colleagues. If only every Christian son and daughter could have heard this lecture before going to college, we would never have lost any of them. Listening to Dr. Bradley talk about the struggles of being a Christian on a secular university campus was just magical. I think a lot of them just feel ashamed of moral rules and truth claims that they were never prepared to defend at the university or in the workplace. They were never taught to see the life of an evidence-wielding secret agent as more fun than getting drunk and having hook-up sex.

Walter Bradley’s thoughts about being a Christian in a hostile environment formed my character and prepared me for the secular workplace. Unlike many Christian leaders who started out conservative and then caved to the secular left for prestige, I never expected non-Christians co-workers to like me. Walter Bradley had already warned me not to expect that. I built my castle with scientific evidence, up on the hill of analytical philosophy from William Lane Craig. Later on, I added a moat around the castle, with the economics of Hayek and Sowell.

His lectures made me want to become a Christian professor. But sadly, I never did get to be a Christian professor like Dr. Bradley. I used to cry about how long it was taking for me to make progress on my “become a Christian professor” plan. Maybe some day… I have had offers to teach introductory computer science courses at Christian universities.

I wish more of our Christian leaders were evidence-based like Dr. Bradley – then then we’d avoid the issues plaguing many denominations. Whenever you look at someone like Russell Moore, David French, Brent Leatherwood, Ed Stetzer, David Platt, etc., you are looking at someone who expected that Christianity would make them feel good and be liked in non-Christian environments. Walter Bradley killed that expectation dead for me. I think that’s why people who knew him, like William Dembski and Robert Marks, have been so faithful to the Boss with their research and writing. By the way, I have met Dembski, Marks and Bradley in real life! I’ve also met Kelly Monroe Kullberg, founder of the Veritas Forum. Those are the type of Christian that I look up to. Who are your role models?

Finally, I have to mention the website “Leadership University“, which was my lifeblood during my undergraduate years. Not only did they have all the transcripts of William Lane Craig’s debates, but they also had many articles by Walter Bradley, and other scholars I loved: J. P. Moreland, Henry Schaefer, Phillip E. Johnson, etc. There were tons of articles there, including articles on controversial topics, like homosexuality. You could find anything that you were being challenged about. And then I also got a lot out of Access Research Network, which had amazing videos that I would watch dozens and dozens of times until I could remember every word.

Many of the same videos I used to watch over and over are now available free, including one with Dr. Walter Bradley.

Anyway, if you haven’t checked out the book about Bradley’s life, get it. And if you want to know what makes me tick, check out the lectures I mentioned. There are other things that had a huge effect on me, but those lectures are my heart and soul. I would say that my resilience over my time at the university and in the secular workplace comes from people like Walter Bradley.

I am also grateful for Art Battson of ARN, who worked on those videos so that I could buy them and watch to them when I was still young. I never met a single non-Christian in the workplace who could defeat these arguments.

By the way, these campus lectures are still going on today – if you want to donate to a great cause, check out my friend Eric Chabot who organizes campus events at THE Ohio State University. He blogs here. I support his work. The lectures that he organizes may be bullet-proofing the worldviews of the next Wintery Knights!