Lately, I’ve noticed that some of the most famous atheists are regretting their long war against Christianity. People like Richard Dawkins spent their lives warring against Christianity. And now that they’ve achieved their goal of diminishing Christian influence, they don’t like the results. They don’t like the Islam. They don’t like the wokeness. They don’t like the transgenderism. But they caused it.
Here’s a story from Breitbart News: (H/T My Dad)
Celebrated atheist and evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins stepped down from the board of the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) on Saturday after the atheist group made clear its allegiance to transgenderism over biological reality.
Dawkins resigned after the foundation censored an article from a fellow scientist who pointed out that sex is, in fact, immutable and biological, and rejected the pseudo-spiritual claim that one can choose their “gender,” The Telegraph reported.
Dawkins accused the organization of caving to the “hysterical squeals” of cancel culture after FFRF pulled the article and called its publishing of it a “mistake.” Dawkins resigned after two other scientists, Jerry Coyne and Steven Pinker, left the organization over the ordeal. The pair accused the foundation of pushing an ideology with the “dogma, blasphemy, and heretics” of a religion, according to the report.
The resignations can be traced back to a piece published to FFRF’s Freethought Now! website and written by Kat Grant called “What is a Woman?” The piece argues against the biological reality of womanhood and instead claims that “a woman is whoever she says she is.”
After they pilled the article by the atheist scientist arguing for biological reality, we got this from the FFRF leaders:
“Despite our best efforts to champion reason and equality, mistakes can happen, and this incident is a reminder of the importance of constant reflection and growth,” co-presidents Dan Barker and Annie Laurie Gaylor wrote.
“Publishing this post was an error of judgment, and we have decided to remove it as it does not reflect our values and principles. We regret any distress caused by this post and are committed to ensuring it doesn’t happen again,” they added.
No one would say that people like Michael Shermer, Richard Dawkins, Jerry Coyne, Steve Pinker were stupid people. What they are is foolish. These are the most foolish people on the planet. They spend their entire lives embracing the lie of atheism. They denied all of the scientific evidence for theism, such as the origin of the universe, the cosmic fine-tuning, the origin of life, explosions of biological complexity in the fossil record, irreducible complexity, habitability, etc.
And what did this advocacy against scientific evidence and reason itself get them? It gets them the Islamic dominance, wokeness, and transgenderism that they now claim to dislike. It would be like someone talking and talking about how much they believe in early retirement, but they way they prepare for retirement is by spending all their money on lottery tickets. And then they act surprised when they get the failure that their actions virtually guaranteed.
Good points! It’s kinda funny to see this long time atheist, turn out to “dislike” one of the woke ideologies that Christians have opposed and known all along to be a huge lie! Transgenderism is a demonic and satanic ideology (just look at the transgender icon that is displayed and used in their satanic rituals!) These people are mentally challenged, and pretending to be the sex that is opposite of how they were born proves it! 🙄☹️😠
LikeLike
I really think that the clear stance that Christians and conservatives took on drugging and mutilating children won us the last election. The left went too far. Even Dawkins is opposed to them on this issue.
LikeLike
SIMPLE: The FFRF are DNA deniers.
LikeLike
They like to talk about reason and science, but it’s a bunch of BS. What they want is to push the moral law as far away as possible. That’s it. That’s all atheism is.
LikeLike
Many atheists spend no time evaluating or contemplating basic beliefs.
Even looking at necessary conditions for life and their worldview have been just accepted to be true because it is. So they have no framework to work out a challenging view
If someone rejects their view of well being automatically correct as the default view on a topic and then rejects basic scientific processes or logic in a view they aren’t equipped to even address the view.
They are either militant people of believe our view or else, or they tend to just fold and tolerate any view easily.
When you come up again radical views that will not tolerate an opposition like we see in society currently this reasoned approach will fail, because you can’t reason with those that have no reason or reality behind their views.
LikeLike
Many atheists spend no time evaluating or contemplating basic beliefs.
Even looking at necessary conditions for life and their worldview have been just accepted to be true because it is. So they have no framework to work out a challenging view
If someone rejects their view of well being automatically correct as the default view on a topic and then rejects basic scientific processes or logic in a view they aren’t equipped to even address the view.
They are either militant people of believe our view or else, or they tend to just fold and tolerate any view easily.
When you come up again radical views that will not tolerate an opposition like we see in society currently this reasoned approach will fail, because you can’t reason with those that have no reason or reality behind their views.
LikeLike