Dr. Land is actually hosting the show. I like to pick on Christian leaders for ignoring apologetics, but I know Dr. Land is very supportive of apologetics, and thinks it is the key to evangelism.
Here are the details of the last Washington Watch Weekly podcast:
On this weekend edition of “Washington Watch with Tony Perkins,” Dr. Richard Land, President of Southern Evangelical Seminary in Charlotte, North Carolina, guest hosted the program for Tony. Bestselling author and attorney, David Limbaugh, joined Dr. Land to discuss his new book: Jesus on Trial, A Lawyer Affirms the Truth of the Gospel, where he lays out the legal aspects of the gospel and gives hard evidence to support that belief. Fox News’ Todd Starnes was here to discuss the latest attack on religious liberty regarding a Lexington, Ky. t-shirt company under attack from the left for standing for Christian principles. Also, FRC’s Executive Vice President and founding member of the Army’s Delta Force, Lt. General (ret) Jerry Boykin joined Dr. Land to highlight the latest on the ISIS threat to America and former Defense Secretary and CIA Director Leon Panetta’s new book where he criticizes the President on his handling of foreign policy issues.
The MP3 file is here. (28 minutes)
This is one of my 5 favorites podcasts.
The five are:
- Family Research Council – Washington Watch Weekly (current events, policy)
- The Weekly Standard (current events, politics, elections)
- Intelligent Design: The Future (science)
- Reasonable Faith (apologetics)
- Cold Case Christianity (apologetics)
There’s another podcast I listen to for current events, but because that person has been annoying Michael Licona, he can remain nameless.
WINTERY KNIGHT 
Hi WK,
I was listening to a sermon that espoused apologetics while decrying judgmentalism because so many non-Christians think of Christians as being judgmental.
It was a rather quick inditement of Christians for being judgmental, and I thought it was a little peculiar since immediately prior the discipline of apologetics was being extolled. Peculiar because apologetics is about promoting and defending and explaining the truth about the Truth. And the simple act of doing this is liable to get someone labeled as being judgmental, agreed?
Anyways, I was looking for an article on google to see if there was a way to do apologetics without being perceived as being judgmental when I came across this article:
Apologetics isn’t for the Lost, It’s for the Saved. This article references Richard Land and the Conference on Apologetics that’s the topic of your post, WK.
As I was reading this article, he categorizes apologists, and it looks like you’d probably fall into category 3.
Could you take a look at this article and tell me what you think of it and whether you fall into Category 3?
Also, is there a way to do apologetics without some militant person labeling a Christian as being too judgmental?
LikeLike
That article is written by an atheist “Godless in Dixie”. I haven’t yet read it, just pointing that out.
LikeLike
People like the superintendent should not even be allowed around young children, never mind have authority over them.
The parents should count themselves lucky they have a little girl. If it was a little boy doing the same thing, the stupidindendent would probably call the police.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Highland Church of Christ Texarkana.
LikeLike