Dennis Prager: does the Bible say do not kill or do not murder?

Dennis Prager’s column on the sixth commandment.

Excerpt:

Here is the text of commandment six — explaining why the King James translation is wrong:

You would think that of all the Ten Commandments the one that needs the least explaining is the sixth, because it seems so clear. It is the one that the King James Bible, the most widely used English translation of the Bible, translates as, “Thou shall not kill.”

Yet, the truth is the quite the opposite. This is probably the least well understood of the Ten Commandments. The reason is that the Hebrew original does not say, “Do not kill.” It says, “Do not murder.” Both Hebrew and English have two words for taking a life — one is “kill” (harag, in Hebrew) and the other is “murder” (ratzach in Hebrew).

The difference between the two is enormous. Kill means:

  1. Taking any life — whether of a human being or an animal.
  2. Taking a human life deliberately or by accident.
  3. Taking a human life legally or illegally, morally or immorally.

On the other hand, murder can only mean one thing: The illegal or immoral taking of a human life. That’s why we say, “I killed a mosquito,” not, “I murdered a mosquito.” And that’s why we would say that “the worker was accidentally killed,” not that “the worker was accidentally murdered.”

So why did the King James translation of the Bible use the word “kill” rather than “murder”? Because 400 years ago, when the translation was made, “kill” was synonymous with “murder.” As a result, some people don’t realize that English has changed since 1610 and therefore think that the Ten Commandments prohibits all killing.

But, of course, it doesn’t. If the Ten Commandments forbade killing, we would all have to be vegetarians, as killing animals would be prohibited. And we would all have to be pacifists — since we could not kill even in self-defense.

However, you don’t have to know how the English language has evolved to understand that the Ten Commandments could not have prohibited all killing.

A correct understanding of the commandment against murder is crucial because, while virtually every modern translation correctly translates the commandment as “Do not murder,” many people cite the King James translation to justify two positions that have no biblical basis: opposition to capital punishment and pacifism.The very same part of the Bible that contains the Ten Commandments — the Five Books of Moses, the Torah as it is known by Jews — commands the death penalty for murder, allows killing in war, prescribes animal sacrifice and allows eating meat.

Regarding capital punishment and the Bible, as I note in my Prager University course on capital punishment, the only law that appears in each one of the Five Books of Moses is that murderers be put to death. Opponents of the death penalty are free to hold the view that all murderers should be allowed to live. But they are not free to cite the Bible to support their view.

Yet, many do. And they always cite the Commandment, “Do not kill.” But that, as should now be abundantly clear, is not what the commandment says, and it is therefore an invalid argument.

Read the rest (it’s the same as the video).

This is related to his new video series for Prager University on the Ten Commandments. You can watch them all here. There’s one for each commandment, and an introduction. Prager University always does a nice job on these videos, and they are a nice, quick way to find out exactly what traditionally-minded people really believe, and why. Most kids in college will never even hear the other side to what their liberal professors say.

7 thoughts on “Dennis Prager: does the Bible say do not kill or do not murder?”

  1. I like this a lot. Could anybody help me out with some more resources for biblical acceptance of self-defense that you agree with or maybe some that make the case against it you feel are valid? I’d appreciate that. Some Christians thoroughly feel that “turn the other cheek” and “do not resist evil” are sound theological foundations for pacifism.

    Like

    1. Morgan stay tuned – I will blog on Wayne Grudem and self-defense tomorrow at 6 PM, and Wayne Grudem and capital punishment Friday at 6 PM. Audio, summary and PDF.

      Like

  2. Such a well written article (says a lot with a little) by Prager.

    Recently, the rightness / wrongness of the death penalty has been a big discussion in the news here in Taiwan because of certain situation in which a young man visited a school, cut the left-hand wrist and the left side of the neck of a poor young elementary school student, watched her choke to death on her own blood, and then called the cops to turn himself in when he knew she was beyond rescue. In turning himself in, he thought he would not be given the death penalty merely life in prison and could, therefore, live out the rest of his life there without having to work. (That was what he himself said.)

    When I stated my opinion that the man should be given the death penalty, a non-Christian started citing the KJV as saying “Thou shalt not kill” as his rebuttal. I hadn’t read the article at the time, but I knew the commandment said “murder”, not “kill”. The opposition refused to accept that, claiming that I was twisting words to fit my agenda, etc. He couldn’t see how a Christian could support the death penalty, which he called “state-sponsored killing”. When I asked him if he supported abortion, the topic was taken off the table, my question left unanswered. I told him I’m pro-life and pro-capital punishment because there is a distinct difference between “guilty” and “innocent”.

    A fine blog here! Thanks…

    Like

    1. And yet I hear so often how important the “contradiction” between being pro-life and pro-death-penalty is. You’ve nailed it, though. In one case the victim is innocent, and in the other case the victim is guilty.

      Like

  3. Very timely post, WK. Especially in light of the growing threats against Christians around the world and here.

    Have been studying this issue for some time–with two of the bigger influences on my thinking being the life (and death) of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, and Nigel Biggar’s “In Defence of War”.

    Like

  4. Thanks for posting this, I’d not been able to watch the “class” yet.

    FWIW, my husband and I can never watch SERGEANT YORK without his going “arrrrrrrgh!” over the incorrect translation of the Sixth Commandment! (Truly, though—think of the anguish its being correctly translated could have saved and still save many decent, well-meaning people.)

    Like

    1. I know! I like Sergeant York, but I cringe when his his army commanders cannot explain the wrong translation in the KJV. I used to like that movie, especially the scene where he gets the enemy soldier to lift his head by doing the turkey whistle. LOL!

      I found it:

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment