How to respond to an atheist who complains about slavery in the Bible

Lets take a closer look at a puzzle
Lets take a closer look at a puzzle

I often hear atheists going on and on about how the Bible has this evil and that evil. Their favorite one seems to be slavery. Here are three things I say to atheists when they push this objection.

The Bible and slavery

First, you should explain to them what the Bible actually says about slavery. And then tell them about the person responsible for stopping slavery in the UK: a devout evangelical named William Wilberforce.

Here’s an article that works.

Excerpt:

We should compare Hebrew debt-servanthood (many translations render this “slavery”) more fairly to apprentice-like positions to pay off debts — much like the indentured servitude during America’s founding when people worked for approximately 7 years to pay off the debt for their passage to the New World. Then they became free.

In most cases, servanthood was more like a live-inemployee, temporarily embedded within the employer’s household. Even today, teams trade sports players to another team that has an owner, and these players belong to a franchise. This language hardly suggests slavery, but rather a formal contractual agreement to be fulfilled — like in the Old Testament.3

Second, inform them that moral values are not rationally grounded on atheism. In an accidental universe, there is no way we ought to be. There is no design for humans that we have to comply with. There are no objective human rights, like the right to liberty (that would block slavery) or the right to life (that would block  abortion). Although you may find that most atheists act nicely, the ones who really understand what atheism means and live it out consistently are not so nice.

Atheism and moral judgments

Second, inform them that moral values are not rationally grounded on atheism. In an accidental universe, there is no way we ought to be. There is no design for humans that we have to comply with. There are no objective human rights, like the right to liberty (that would block slavery) or the right to life (that would block  abortion). Although you may find that most atheists act nicely, the ones who really understand what atheism means and live it out consistently are not so nice.

Dawkins has previously written this:

The total amount of suffering per year in the natural world is beyond all decent contemplation. During the minute that it takes me to compose this sentence, thousands of animals are being eaten alive, many others are running for their lives, whimpering with fear, others are slowly being devoured from within by rasping parasites, thousands of all kinds are dying of starvation, thirst, and disease. It must be so. If there ever is a time of plenty, this very fact will automatically lead to an increase in the population until the natural state of starvation and misery is restored. In a universe of electrons and selfish genes, blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt, other people are going to get lucky, and you won’t find any rhyme or reason in it, nor any justice. The universe that we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pitiless indifference.

(“God’s Utility Function,” Scientific American, November, 1995, p. 85)

When people like Dawkins talk about morality, you have to understand that they are pretending. To them, morality is just about personal preferences and cultural conventions. They just think that questions of right and wrong are arbitrary. Things that are wrong in one time and place are right in another. Every view is as right as any other, depending on the time and place. That’s atheist morality.

What’s worse than slavery? Abortion!

Third, you should ask the atheist what he has done to oppose abortion. Abortion is worse than slavery, so if they are sincere in thinking that slavery is wrong, then they ought to think that abortion is wrong even more. So ask them what they’ve done to oppose the practice of abortion. That will tell you how sincere they are about slavery.

Here’s Richard Dawkins explaining what he’s done to stop abortion:

That’s right. The head atheist supports killing born children.

7 thoughts on “How to respond to an atheist who complains about slavery in the Bible”

  1. “Although you may find that most atheists act nicely, the ones who really understand what atheism means and live it out consistently are not so nice.”

    One need look no further than the USSR and PRC to see atheists who indeed understand it and live it out.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Exactly. Even here a little scratching and you’ll find that American atheists just cash out prescriptive morality as doing what makes me happy and what makes other people like me.

      Like

  2. Atheists are always claiming that no one has ever killed in the name of atheism, like they have in the name of religion.

    True, but what they fail/refuse to see is that, given atheism, there is nothing to STOP someone from killing another.

    Evidence? Over 100 million people murdered by atheistic Communist regimes in the 20th century alone.

    More evidence? The Founder of Christianity (unlike the founder of Islam) NEVER told His followers to kill in His name.

    Like

    1. You can also consider how many serial killers that were committed to life is meaningless and pointless. Killing is like a chemical reaction only wrong from a societal point of view.

      If an atheist rejects societal rules there is no way to make them commit to a value in life

      And atheism is responsible for devaluing humans and making animal and nature life more valuable than the life of a human.

      An atheist that does not accept humanism is impossible to change by human standards

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Of course if one accepts all of the ramifications of a materialist/Darwinian worldview, then killing simply is. It’s not good or bad, just evolutionary beneficial to the fittest. You should look at the evolutionary justifications for rape as well. According to some, it’s an evolutionary necessity.

        Like

  3. I’m curious how you would respond to a christian who advanced the same sorts of arguments regarding slavery? I regularly interact with several and it’s challenging.

    Like

Leave a comment