Three data points. The first two from John Hawkins of Right Wing News.
Excerpt:
The first was an article talking up pedophilia in Gawker.
Van Gjiseghem says what he and his colleagues mean by sexual orientation is a person’s inborn and unalterable sexual preference, irrespective of whether that preference is harmful to others or not.
…Imagine a world in which admitting your attraction to busty women or tall men led to alienation, jail time, or your murder.
…The old adage is that the true mark of a society is how it treats the weakest in its ranks. Blacks, women, Latinos, gays and lesbians, and others are still in no way on wholly equal footing in America. But they’re also not nearly as lowly and cursed as men attracted to children. One imagines that if Jesus ever came to Earth, he’d embrace the poor, the blind, the lepers, and, yes, the pedophile.
Then, there are these comments in favor of incest from the director of The Notebook.
“I have no experience with incest…You know what? This whole movie is about judgment, and lack of it, and doing what you want,” he said.
“Who gives a sh-t if people judge you? I’m not saying this is an absolute but in a way, if you’re not having kids – who gives a damn? Love who you want. Isn’t that what we say? Gay marriage – love who you want? If it’s your brother or sister it’s super-weird, but if you look at it, you’re not hurting anybody except every single person who freaks out because you’re in love with one another.”
And the third from Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse at the Public Discourse.
Excerpt:
Can a child have three parents? If California State Senator Mark Leno has his way, children in California will be able to have three legal parents. Before we dismiss SB 1476 as another example of California Weird, we had best look into it more closely. After all, the bill has passed both houses of the California Assembly and is awaiting Governor Brown’s signature or veto.
I believe this development was inevitable, more inevitable in fact than the much-vaunted inevitability of gay marriage. Once we started trying to normalize parenting by same-sex couples and redefine marriage to remove the dual-gender requirement, we had to end up with triple-parenting.
[…]It all sounds very nice and agreeable to allow people to make any parenting agreements they want on the front end of their relationships. But when a relationship breaks down, the long arm of the law will end up involved in the life of the family, on the back end, to resolve disputes. We are replacing the natural pre-political concept of biological parenthood with an artificial, government-created concept of parenthood that is entirely socially constructed. Instead of the government simply recognizing and recording the pre-political reality of biological parenthood, we are giving agents of the state the authority to construct parenthood, all in the best interests of the child, of course.
Gay marriage advocates can’t object to any of these practices. Their view is that people should be able to “marry” whoever they “love”. And that means pedophilia, incest and polygamy. It’s not broadening the definition of marriage – it’s destroying marriage. Marriage used to be the union of a man and a woman in order to have a stable environment to contain sexual attraction and to raise children to whom both parents are biologically related. Marriage put moral boundaries on the sexual act for the benefit of children, and consequently, for the benefit of society.
Related posts
- Law professor uses same-sex marriage law to argue for legalizing polygamy
- Queen’s University feminist says that polygamy should be permitted
- British Columbia Supreme Court considers striking down ban on polygamy
- Will Canada add polgygamy and polyamory on top of same-sex marriage?
- Taxpayer-funded polygamy in the UK, France and Canada
- Mark Regnerus’s research vindicated by University of Texas at Austin
- Growing up with two lesbian mothers: a child’s perspective
- Mark Regnerus and the progressive war against science
- More social scientists stepping forward to defend Regnerus study
- Do children of gay parents perform as well as those of heterosexual parents?
- Are gay relationships typically stable and monogamous?
- The American Psychological Association (APA) on lesbian and gay parenting
- Do children raised by gays and lesbians do as well as those of married parents?
- New study finds that children do best in traditional mother-father families
- Obama openly supports gay marriage: 48 hours after top gay donors cut off funding
- Democrat introduces bill to defund adoption agencies that favor married couples
- A secular case against same-sex marriage
The “talking up pedophilia in Gawker” link is broken. It should be: http://dustinstockton.com/2012/09/gawker-know-who-else-is-born-this-way-pedophiles
LikeLike
Fixed! Thank you.
LikeLike
In a way, I feel like this is the only way that your garden-variety same-sex marriage proponent will think through the logical consequences of their premises. It’s going to be interesting to see the arguments used against the polygamists by the people with “Support Marriage Equality” bumper stickers on their cars.
LikeLike
Figures. How long will it be before the rest who champion sexual freedom are called “hypocritical bigots” for taking a stand against pedophilia?
LikeLike